Michael Amster wrote:
Well, yes - I need an oscilloscope and do not own one. I am sure that
my 3 PSUs are working as designed (+5V digital, +5analog and +-15v
analog).
+5 analog? What's that for? As far as I could see, the DI/O requires +5V
for the digital board and +/- 15V for the analogue
Hi,
I am pleased to announce v0.1.4 of my flac2mp3.pl script.
Download it here: http://robinbowes.com/filemgmt/visit.php?lid=4
Changelog:
# v0.1.4
# - Fix for files with multiple periods in filename, e.g. 01 - Back In
#The U.S.S.R..flac would be converted as Back In The U.mp3
# - Fix for
Larry Truesdale wrote:
Your math is too simplistic.
Deliberately so.
Typically, most 802.11b environments can
sustain no more than 2-3 Mb/s.
The peak bandwidth under ideal (and
unusual) circumstances is 4-5 Mbps.
I know this. That's why I have my wireless Squeezebox on a dedicated
access
Christian Pernegger wrote:
Quotes from:
http://www.digido.com/portal/pmodule_id=11/pmdmode=fullscreen/pageadder_page_id=28/
First paragraph on that page:
October 2002
I hesitate to remove this older article from our website, as it is still
informative, but I highly recommend that those
Christian Pernegger wrote:
[healthy skepticism snipped]
Either the bit stream is tranmitted intact or it is not. There is no
in-between. Sure, the waveform is distorted but there would have to be
in insane lot of this line induced jitter to actually flip bits.
You're missing the point
T wrote:
No, the vertical settings appear to be the same - this suggests that
signal levels are different, i.e. the output from their gadget is higher.
Probably, but it no longer a fair test to show rise time and jitter if
the amplitude/time ratio is not constant. It is irrelevant if it is due
Christian Pernegger wrote:
You're missing the point completely. It's not as simple as the
bitstream is transmitted intect or it is not. At the implementation
level, this bitstream is actually a sequence of precisely-timed
voltage transitions. This stream is decoded by the DAC to produce the
Christian Pernegger wrote:
Check again. You may have been *thinking* reclocking, but you didn't
mention it.
[...]
That relates to buffering, which is *not* what we're talking about; at
least, it's not what *I'm*
talking about.
Once you use a buffer / FIFO you'll want to read what was written to
Julian Alden-Salter wrote:
Robin,
What difference do you hear?
Without launching off into audiophile rambling about 'inner detail' and
'timbre'. The dpa just sounded more realistic, detail was easier to hear and
transients (i.e. drum strikes) had more impact whilst the squeezebox sounded
muffled
Danny Rego wrote:
Does the pitch control only work with the analog outs? or should it
work with digital outs as well?
I have an idea for a plugin for guitar players/musicians that would tune
the music to your instrument to help you practise, but I can't seem to
get the pitch control to work.
Jack Coates wrote:
dean blackketter wrote:
On Mar 2, 2005, at 8:23 AM, Dan Goodinson wrote:
I want a pony.
Please file a feature request on http://bugs.slimdevices.com
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918
Just voted for this.
:)
R.
--
http://robinbowes.com
Phil Karn wrote:
The big flaw with this particular measurement (other than the
horizontal sweep has been blown up to greatly exaggerate the problem)
What makes you think that?
Because I can read a scope legend. The scope has been blown up in the
horizontal direction to exaggerate the jitter
Phil Karn wrote:
If you have a typical small home router box with DHCP support (e.g.,
Linksys, Netgear, D-Link, SMC), it will generally let you specify the
range of addresses that it will allocate dynamically. Allocate a
reasonable number of addresses in your subnet to the dynamic pool for
Phil Karn wrote:
Robin Bowes wrote:
What information on that image tells you that? It seems to me you're
not understanding what you're seeing.
The legend says the time trace is 5 ns/div. A pair of measuring lines
implies that the jitter on the uncorrected is somewhat less than that,
about 3 ns
Mike Hartley wrote:
Now that the native 802.11G SB2 is out, I am going to purchase a
wireless DSL router to accomodate it. The router has to have PPPOE;
firewall, DMZ, and port-forwarding capability; and at least one
ethernet wired connection for my main PC. I am considering a Netgear
WGR614NA,
Dave wrote:
Hi All,
Ive just setup my new slimserver box running Mandrake 10.1 with the
new Seagate 400Gb Barracuda HDD.
Im about to re-archive my CD collection and now that Ive got space
to burn Im considering using a lossless format of some description
so as to repoducce the sweetest possible
Craig wrote:
I'm writing a program to back up a music library and have been asked
about making a duplicate library but in mp3 for use with a portable player.
Can I use mov123.exe to convert between aac and mp3? and if so where can
I find the commands?
I wrote this [1] script to convert between
Sean Adams wrote:
Yes, Squeezebox2 has 6 volt peak-to-peak line out levels, which is the
standard for high-end equipment. Squeezebox1 is 3Vpp.
Sean,
How is this output level determined? Is there anyway to tweak a SB1 to
increase the output levels (other than adding a x2 voltage gain stage!)?
Hi,
I managed to be rather too rough with the antenna on my wireless SB1 and
broke it by screwing it in too hard.
I presume (hope?) it's a fairly generic part and that I can pick up
another one fairly easily.
Can someone provide me with the spec. for the connector or, beter still,
point me at
Robin Bowes wrote:
Hi,
I managed to be rather too rough with the antenna on my wireless SB1 and
broke it by screwing it in too hard.
I presume (hope?) it's a fairly generic part and that I can pick up
another one fairly easily.
Can someone provide me with the spec. for the connector or, beter
Jason wrote:
Volume has always been controlled server side, which would mean digitally.
I'm sure someone more qualified will confirm this, but this is just
plain wrong.
The volume is controlled internally within the main chip in the SB.
R.
--
http://robinbowes.com
Chris Glushko wrote:
But, what if you have a very large music collection
and use an iPod where you interchange tracks often?
This would mean that for every new track you want on
your ipod, you'll have to go to your flac library,
decompress the file, import it into iTunes, tag it in
iTunes,
Mike Hartley wrote:
If that is the case, the sound should be identical since FLAC
is lossless.
Not so. There is a possibility that the timing (i.e. clock rate) is
different between flac and PCM. That's pure speculation, but I'm just
pointing out that just getting the bits the same doesn't mean
Jason wrote:
but it's almost impossible to believe that with an external
DAC that he could hear much if any difference to begin with.
Hey, are you Phil's twin? :)
R.
--
http://robinbowes.com
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
Phil Karn wrote:
It just occurred to me that I could try forcing the Ethernet down to 10
megabits/sec and see if the problem still occurs. If it's indeed due to
DAC starvation from lack of proper CPU real-time management, this might
work around the problem by limiting the peak speed of the
Michael Herger wrote:
Do you have a firewall installed and activated (XP comes with an
integrated firewall!). Be sure to check the FAQ about that:
http://www.slimdevices.com/su_faq.html#networking-firewall
Hmmm. That's confusing. It says:
You will then need to add three exceptions for these
Simon @ Home wrote:
Hello.
Hi Simon, how's it going?
Can anyone suggest a (not expensive) solution? Does it exist? I am getting
quite fed up of not being able to listen to my lossless files on my hifi.
How about this:
http://variant.ch/phpwiki/WikiBlog/2005-02-27
R.
--
http://robinbowes.com
Mark Teigen wrote:
My collection is in Flac. I need MP3 for a portable.
Whats the best program for windows to convert Flac to MP3?
Mark,
I don't know about best but I use the following script:
http://robinbowes.com/filemgmt/viewcat.php?cid=4
As of writing, v0.2.1 is the latest.
I've not got round
Patrick Dixon wrote:
The idea came to mind when I heard about how an IT manager had
explained to his boss that two disks in their RAID 5 array had died at
the same time (causing the loss of a month's data), because they had
been bought at the same time ;-)
A more likely cause would be IT Manager
Jack Coates wrote:
cpriest wrote:
Hi all, I'm considering purchasing this slimbox2 and I was wondering if
I am able to re-route the sound coming from my windows box to the slim
box? Right now I'm quite attached to using Yahoo Launchcast.
Is there any way that I can play music 'to' the slimbox2?
Sean Adams wrote:
[flame suit on] Personally I find it unfortunate that S/PDIF was ever
specified to run over coax copper in the first place. There are some
who claim it's better than fiber for various reasons, but all empirical
data says that optical S/PDIF is FAR more reliable, works
Craig, James (IT) wrote:
BTW everyone there is a SlimScrobbler group on AudioScrobbler - only 30
members at present although almost 70 - no, 80 now - are using the
Scrobbler plugin!
Up to 33 now.
R.
PS. kdf, you listen to way too much U2! :)
--
http://robinbowes.com
ultra238a wrote:
How would you guys like the sound of a box with Gigabit Ethernet, much
faster CPU, runs Slimserver out of the box and.. you can run your
own software on it? Oh and a projected retail price of £199.99 with a
120Gb (maybe a 160Gb) price point ($320 for our American friends)!
NHGuy wrote:
I would agree if that independant review was not so prominently
displayed on their website as a reason to buy their product.
The link you gave was www.slimdevices.com/marketing/resellers-guide.pdf
This is buried in the Resellers page - hardly what I would call
prominently
NHGuy wrote:
Jacob,
Go up a few messages and read the marketing blurb from their maketing
manager talking about how great the realslim plugin works in
Squeezebox.
Post a link.
I'm not a lawyer, nor do I expect to have to parse the the
reviews posted on a website to ensure the 100% accuracy
NHGuy wrote:
The review from Maximum PC is the one that's prominently displayed.
So why did you post a link to the resellers' guide when asked to show
where this claim is prominently displayed?
Since when does a product upgrade mean that functionality is taken
away?
So, you've *assumed*
NHGuy wrote:
# What was aggravating to me was the response from the CEO stating, and I
paraphrase, that they were working on more interesting things( this is
way up at the beginning of this thread).
Sean Adams said:
This isn't really our position or our goal (see roadmap: http://
JimC wrote:
As you may have seen from my earlier post, we're going to be migrating
from kwiki to mediawiki. I'm currently going through some housekeeping
in preparation for the Great Re-editing that will start later this week
and I wanted to float a question to the community:
Should we
One (important) point that no-one has yet pointed out is that I don't
believe that Mandriva is an officially supported platform. Although, on
looking this up in the FAQ, it only says:
Squeezebox, Transporter and SlimServer are officially supported under:
* Windows NT/2000/XP,
* Linux
badbob wrote:
How come a 64 bit version wasen't been released?
Because you don't need a 64-bit version. It would just be bigger.
R.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
Khuli wrote:
MuckleEck;286440 Wrote:
I see no point in syncing the bedroom SB
Depends what sort of parties you have ;)
Nah, you'd want different music in the bedroom - Barry White, for example ;)
Personally, I've found that Bill Wither's Greatest Hits never fails :)
R.
jaffacake wrote:
The review is fairly flawed in several areas, but not entirely
surprising given the limited research the author often does for his
articles.
snip
Ahem, unlike your totally fair and thoroughly researched cnet reviews,
eh Ben?
More FUD from the Sonos fanboy.
R.
jaffacake wrote:
Robin Bowes;287134 Wrote:
Ahem, unlike your totally fair and thoroughly researched cnet reviews,
eh Ben?
More FUD from the Sonos fanboy.
R.
Very much unlike. At least everything in my review was accurate and
factual.
Did you write that review [1] based on having
jaffacake wrote:
I have absolutely no desire to waste my time defending myself against
false accusation and speculation.
Robin Bowes, and others, are attacking me with untruths and guesswork.
This is damaging to my reputation yet you choose to allow it to remain
within your forums. I can
mflint wrote:
(For some reason, Net-UDAP couldn't discover the SBR unless it was
hard-wired to my router)
I wrote the tool specifically to configure a factory-supplied (i.e. no
config) SBR from a PC without requiring a SBC. Until the SBR is
configured, it cannot connect to any wireless
jaffacake wrote:
Thanks to all for the responses.
A few more ideas...
One way to do this would be to run multiple instances of SC. If you want
to run these on the same box, you would need to use different IPs for
each instance. You'd probably also want to use a system-installed
MySQL
Peter wrote:
Robin Bowes wrote:
Even when configured, the UDAP protocol is UDP-based so the UDAP source
(PC) and UDAP destination (SBR) have to be on the same network segment.
There's no causality in that. UDP works fine over the Internet. You
probably mean it's broadcast based which
rbz5416 wrote:
Brown nosers need not post telling me it works for them - I'm not
interested. I AM interested in why this bug report appears to be being
completely ignored.
Displaying attitude like that will not help your cause.
Bugs are prioritised and dealt with accordingly. I do not work
is therefore likely a low priority to SD and,
because it's not getting the attention *you* feel it should have you
extrapolate from that that Logitech aren't committed to the product
line? Ha ha haha .
rbz5416 wrote:
Robin Bowes Wrote:
Displaying attitude like that will not help your cause
It's
rbz5416 wrote:
Zzz
Unsubscribes.
By!
R.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
bad.wolf wrote:
Anyone else had similar experiences?
Yeah, some guy posted in the audiophile forum with exactly the same
issues. :|
R.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
NathanielK wrote:
in the shell window, I can execute the help and list commands, but when
I try discover I get a huge amount of text. I copied it to notepad and
it seems to be this, repeated over and over:
Use of uninitialized value $rawstr in length at
C:/UDAP_Thing/scripts/../src/Net
NathanielK wrote:
Low and behold, when I ran the shell, if worked exactly like the
short instructions in the post by jrfuda; even discovering and
configuring over my wireless network.
Glad it's working.
It sounds like this was a network issue, and the scripts are not
entirely bulletproof,
NathanielK wrote:
I find it very hard to believe that all of these different sources
would mention the bridging feature yet not a single one acknowledges
the fact that it is unsupported in the interface or documentation for
the product.
Nathaniel,
From what I can gather, bridging is
tonythetiger wrote:
Thanks all for the replies.
I have changed to FLAC but not sure if it's helped.
The TX rate has dropped to 2Mb some times, and has been 0 before too.
I wasn't sure if that was SqueezeCenter not pumping out the tracks or
if that was just bad network.
Anyways, it seems
ianstuart wrote:
I have been having connection problems with my two Duets for the last
several months. Support now blames the Netgear Range Extender that I
bought to permit the receivers to work more than 15 feet from the
router. Odd that my old SB3 works perfectly with the Range Extender and
MrSinatra wrote:
i am suggesting that developing SC as the only pgm possible to power
the hardware isn't the best soluton, given its serious limitations,
which are legion.
Mr. Sinatra, you're talking bollocks again.
SC has its flaws, yes, but from the way you talk anyone would think it's
MrSinatra wrote:
yeah, how DARE i have an opinion that doesn't require pom poms. what
was i thinking?
Straight in with the fan boy line of defence, I see. *yawn*.
i stand by what i said, and if u don't like it or disagree, fine, but i
find NOTHING exaggerated with what i said.
You
MrSinatra wrote:
don't ignore the context of what i said...
Ok, here's what you said, in its entirety:
again, i respect SC and i'm not saying it should be thrown
overboard, but why force it to be the only solution?
You then follow that up with:
i was talking about what slim does, and they
Neil Davidson wrote:
Just noticed that Scan.co.uk has both wired and wireless in black and silver
on their Today Only page for the weekend.
Only a few £ less than their normal price, but I had no idea they even
stocked it :)
(http://www.scan.co.uk/todayonly/ for those that are interested)
I
Simon @ Home wrote:
Only a few £ less than their normal price, but I had no
idea they even stocked it :)
(http://www.scan.co.uk/todayonly/ for those that are interested)
I hate you. You've made me spend money!!!
You too huh?
:-)
Yeah, I've been making excuses for too long now. This
Paul Webster wrote:
I did the same ... 2nd one ... wife on holiday ;)
I think I saw that we get a free LAN card as well - not that it will
help me much ... maybe I can find a PC with 10Mb card and replace it.
Free LAN card? Where did you see that?
R.
Fifer wrote:
Top of the /todayonly page. Free gift with any order over £149 (ex VAT
Delivery) - Dlink DFE-530TX+ 10/100 PCI NIC. I'm seriously tempted (I
don't need a NIC but I want an SB2). Which colour though?
Ah, got it. I dare say I'll be able to use that somewhere.
I had the same
weedie wrote:
Has anyone hooked up their squeezebox to play the streams from
http://www.naxosradio.com ? If so, how?
Hmmm, from their website:
- 64Kbps Broadband [Near CD quality]
They're kidding, right?
R.
___
Discuss mailing list
ModelCitizen wrote:
I have a problem with my brand new Squeezebox 2. The text on the display
is tiny and spreads over four lines (vertically), the top two being
duplicated on the two below. The text is just about too small to be
intelligable.
I received my new SB2 and just replaced the SB1 with
DrNic wrote:
max.spicer Wrote:
If the platinum doesn't grow on you, you could always send it back and
get a full refund or probably an exchange from SlimDevices. That's
what the 30 day returns policy is there for after all. I'd be
interested to see how this works in the UK, though.
Max
max.spicer wrote:
I'm in the UK. Thanks for the link - I'd definitely not come across
that before.
Interesting that Dean regards the association between SlimDevices and
cannabis as fortuitous. :-) :-)
Why do you think it takes so long to get releases out? ;)
They're in California. What do
dean blackketter wrote:
Whoa! Dude! You are killing my buzz!
On Jul 22, 2005, at 1:41 AM, Robin Bowes wrote:
max.spicer wrote:
I'm in the UK. Thanks for the link - I'd definitely not come across
that before.
Interesting that Dean regards the association between SlimDevices and
cannabis
Mark Hughes wrote:
On 7/22/05, waldy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Want to keep track of the Ashes test match score on your squeezebox?
Updated Cricket (TMS) plugin available from
http://www.wizfamily.co.uk/slim/tms.html
Nothing to do with the plugin but has anyone noticed anything familiar
dean blackketter wrote:
No, but it does require some support in the player firmware to do
fine-grained volume control on a per track basis after decoding.
Dean,
There is a reason why the flac flag to turn on replaygain is:
--apply-replaygain-which-is-not-lossless
See this thread:
Michael Herger wrote:
I recently built myself a ITX based slimserver appliance for my own
use. Not cheap, not ready for that huge FLAC collection (due to 2.5HD),
In my experience, it's the storage that causes the bulk of the problems.
For example, I have a large flac collection and am
Stuart Cooper wrote:
You can also now run SlimServer on The Nexon NAS 1000 device:
http://www.multitask-computing.co.uk/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=37
0
Ooops! Word-wrap broke your link!
It's a 1Tb box which has won the PC Plus UK Performance Award in a
stand-alone review featured
Michael Herger wrote:
IMHO, the best solution is to locate the computer running
slimserver well away from your listening environment so noise is not
an issue, and size is less of a problem. It's cheaper too as you
don't have to have the server on display so looks are not an issue
and you
Yannzola wrote:
dean Wrote:
Yannzola asked if it would be down sampled which is probably a misuse
of terminology. (Downsampling, means to change the sample rate
of a signal.)
Yup, it =was= misuse of the word on my part... but Robin caught the
right drift. What I meant to ask was if the
Robin Bowes wrote:
Yannzola wrote:
dean Wrote:
Yannzola asked if it would be down sampled which is probably a misuse
of terminology. (Downsampling, means to change the sample rate of a
signal.)
Yup, it =was= misuse of the word on my part... but Robin caught the
right drift. What I
Simon @ Home wrote:
I've just ordered a 3.2mghz PC and am hoping this sorts out my problems and
that Slimserver, for the first time since I have been running it, works as I
expect it to.
It probably will if you install Linux on it :)
R.
Simon Turner
Barcombe UK
radish wrote:
It probably will if you install Linux on it :)
Amusing, but hardly accurate. I, and many others, run SS on windows
with no problems.
Sorry. Private joke. I used to live near Simon and we met up a couple of
times to get all geeky about music, hifi, and our Squeezeboxes. He'd
Hi,
I'm running slimserver on Fedora Core 4.
I left a track paused overnight, then stopped it this morning (turned
the player off). Sometime later, slimserver died.
This is the log:
2005-07-31 08:59:04.759859500 2005-07-31 08:59:04.7349
00:04:20:05:b6:5b: Switch
ing to mode stop from
kdf wrote:
Quoting Robin Bowes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2005-07-31 09:21:38.601774500 EOF instead of response status line at
/usr/local/
slim-svn-6/server/CPAN/Net/HTTP/Methods.pm line 300.
2005-07-31 09:21:38.601782500 ...propagated at
/usr/local/slim-svn-6/server/CP
AN/Net/HTTP/NB.pm line 32
CardinalFang wrote:
Wow - fast reply - thanks!
I'll see if I can source longer lengths, otherwise I'll have to think
of something else. I suppose I could extend the other side of the
motherboard and have screened cable to case mounted RCA plugs etc if
all else fails.
Paul,
Is this any good:
MrC wrote:
I agree. It is more difficult to test new or changed portions of the
code otherwise.
I would love to see an accumulative change list included with each
build.
If you use svn to get the latest code, instead of downloading betas or
nightlies, you can use the svn log command to see
dean blackketter wrote:
On Aug 16, 2005, at 9:35 AM, MrC wrote:
Hmmm. Clicking through dozens of links is not my, nor probably
Yannzola's, idea of release notes.
It may be possible for the build script to create a raw changelog from
the checkin comments. It would certainly be better
kdf wrote:
Quoting MrC [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hmmm. Clicking through dozens of links is not my, nor probably
Yannzola's, idea of release notes.
ok, your choice.
I would agree. A load of links does *not* constitute release notes.
I think svn log could be the answer. It would be nice if it
kdf wrote:
Quoting Robin Bowes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
kdf wrote:
Quoting MrC [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hmmm. Clicking through dozens of links is not my, nor probably
Yannzola's, idea of release notes.
ok, your choice.
I would agree. A load of links does *not* constitute release notes.
yes
radish said the following on 23/08/2005 23:51:
BBobley Wrote:
I use this very nice piece of Windows software called Second Copy.
http://www.secondcopy.com/ Basically, you give it a source folder and
a destination folder. The destination can be on another hard disk or
even another computer
Gregory Forrest said the following on 26/08/2005 14:26:
I just rescanned and yet another copy of the songs were created...this
explains it as I created most playlists via a text editor.
I received no other replies so I figured I missed this in the bug search..I
am going to search by a few other
Aslak said the following on 29/08/2005 23:40:
Looking at AlienBBC I remember now what the problem was. I run
SlimServer on my fileserver box (Fedora), and it dosn't have X, which
is a requirement for mplayer. So I'm kind of screwed because I really
don't want to clog up the machine with an X
Dr Lovegrove wrote:
Ordered my 3rd squeezebox over the weekend, and to celebrate I thought
I'd share the little pc application I've been working on for the past
few months.
It's called Moose and it's a fast non-web-based front-end for
searching and selecting music.
I've thrown some very rough
Dr Lovegrove wrote:
Indeed, the server needs to be windows.. You can copy the moo
file from the server to a remote machine (or share it over a network)
though.
True - but I run Linux!
What would be *really* cool would be if you could use the existing
slimserver DB through the CLI.
giulianoz wrote:
Another way this could be done:
add a filed in the songs table wich contains the numeric representation
of the title/artist/song/whatever and do the seaqrch query on this
field.
i.e.:
db field : metallica - 638255421
user input etall - 38255
query: select fields from table
Dan Goodinson wrote:
Slim Devices could distribute a complete, ready-configured OS on a CD
for each major release. Then any technophobes would simply have to
turn the PC on (and boot from CD) to have SS up and running within a
couple of minutes. For those users that found it easy to use, they
Richard Scales said the following on 30/08/2005 19:52:
Just checked your web site and clicked on the link for a larger version of
the Squeezebox - what do you see?
Ooops!
On a related note, I thought I'd check out Radio Paradise after hearing
it recommended on these forums.
I went to the
seanadams wrote:
A fine idea - please file a request at bugs.slimdevices.com. It's
something we'd need to do in firmware, right at the end of our audio
process.
Actually, you could do this on the server by piping the audio stream
through the appropriate processing program.
What kind of
Robin Bowes wrote:
seanadams wrote:
A fine idea - please file a request at bugs.slimdevices.com. It's
something we'd need to do in firmware, right at the end of our audio
process.
Actually, you could do this on the server by piping the audio stream
through the appropriate processing
Alex Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes wrote:
if what you are referring to is the cross-feeding stuff to make headphones
sound nicer, then HeadRoom has some docs here:
http://www.headphone.com/products/faqs/about-headroom-crossfeed/ but it
doesn't actually tell you exactly how to do it (obviously).
chris wrote:
Yeah, I'm also a little confused as to how could you do that unless the
SB2 itself supported ssh tunneling?
Perhaps you open the SSH tunnel on a local PC, and then point the SB at
that machine as the server? (he says, guessing)
Yes, that's exactly how you would do it.
Set up ssh
Roy Owen wrote:
For all of you that use Windows for workstations etc.
http://www.bitvise.com has a very good (free) ssh client that is simple
to setup for this (or any other) purpose. I use this solution at work
with an SBG and it works great.
PuTTY is the defacto standard ssh client for
Hi,
I'm a doing a little market research and would appreciate your opinions
by way of answers to the questions below.
1. Are you holding off buying a Squeezebox because you are not sure
about setting up a computer to run slimserver?
2. Would you be interested in buying a server
Jack Coates said the following on 05/09/2005 23:22:
robinbowes wrote:
This is of no help at all to the OP, but this thread has given me the
impetus to get slimserver working with djb's daemontools
(http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html).
... only thing I use out of daemontools is setuidgid
Jack Coates said the following on 06/09/2005 00:16:
Robin Bowes wrote:
Why's that? supervise, svc, multilog, all really useful tools.
They've alway struck me as an attempt to reimplement SysV init scripts
for distros that don't do SysV. I haven't missed their functionality.
No, they do
1 - 100 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
