EyeRonik1;394730 Wrote:
Mark,
We live in a wonderful time - remember back to 2006, when all we had
was radio, iPods and home entertainment systems? Takes you back doesn't
it?
Ron
Owning a Squeezebox is like living in the future.
--
ajkidle
Hi,
I listen to LastFM a lot and to Pandora from time to time.
Stragely my opinion would be the opposite of yours. I find LastFM
repeats too much after a while. Also they really overweight period vs.
musical characteristics
I found Pandora more usefule to discover new stuff.
But then again I use
marklings;394526 Wrote:
Hi,
Could it be that when you use a radio service a lot in the end they all
show similar, understandably, limitations ?
Cheers, Mark.
Mark,
I'll bet you nailed it. I listen to Last.fm for a change of pace. I
don't listen often enough to notice its flaws. I
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 6:39 PM, EyeRonik1
eyeronik1.3nbewn1234140...@no-mx.forums.slimdevices.com wrote:
- A Jack Johnson seed creates a station filled with improvisational
jazz, even after killing every instance of it. When I want Chick Corea,
I'll create a station for him.
Interesting that
Hi gang,
I listen to all of these, and here are my comparisons:
Pandora - My favorite, but it has some quirks. It has a huge supply of
artists and generally creates a nice station from a suggestion. Here
are the quirks though:
- Limited supply of music per station. Once I get it tuned if I
I find myself using slacker a lot. The ads don't bother me. last.fm
always gave me mixes that were too oscure. Pandora works great if you
are trying to branch out for new music. I'm not always in the mood for
this.
Slacker does great through a large variety of genres. I use it for 80s
pop
