Re: [Discuss] Sandstorm Etherpad is a memory hog

2016-01-27 Thread Bryan Richter
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:53:49PM -0800, Bryan Richter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:45:20PM -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote: > > On 01/27/2016 02:29 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > > Each Etherpad pad uses 60-100MB of memory when someone has it > > > open. Right now there are four open pads, using a t

Re: [Discuss] Sandstorm Etherpad is a memory hog

2016-01-27 Thread Bryan Richter
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:45:20PM -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 01/27/2016 02:29 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > > Each Etherpad pad uses 60-100MB of memory when someone has it > > open. Right now there are four open pads, using a total of 27% of > > the system's memory. > > > > I don't know if we can

Re: [Discuss] Sandstorm Etherpad is a memory hog

2016-01-27 Thread Aaron Wolf
On 01/27/2016 02:29 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > Each Etherpad pad uses 60-100MB of memory when someone has it open. > Right now there are four open pads, using a total of 27% of the > system's memory. > > I don't know if we can stand for that. Options? Thoughts? > Naive non-tech-thought: That's k

[Discuss] Sandstorm Etherpad is a memory hog

2016-01-27 Thread Bryan Richter
Each Etherpad pad uses 60-100MB of memory when someone has it open. Right now there are four open pads, using a total of 27% of the system's memory. I don't know if we can stand for that. Options? Thoughts? signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___