[Discuss] Handling Forgotten *.html Commits

2015-03-18 Thread Gabriel A. Devenyi
Quick question, we've merged a number of commits to the shell-novice lesson and I've realized that they didn't update the html files. How should we handle those changes safely? Is a special commit good enough? -- Gabriel A. Devenyi B.Eng. Ph.D. Research Computing Associate Computational Brain

Re: [Discuss] Handling Forgotten *.html Commits

2015-03-18 Thread Greg Wilson
Hi, We've asked people to submit only the source Markdown for review; topic maintainers should update and merge HTML when it's ready to bake. Thanks, Greg On 2015-03-18 7:46 AM, Gabriel A. Devenyi wrote: Quick question, we've merged a number of commits to the shell-novice lesson and I've

Re: [Discuss] Handling Forgotten *.html Commits

2015-03-18 Thread John Blischak
Hi Gabriel, On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Greg Wilson gvwil...@software-carpentry.org wrote: We've asked people to submit only the source Markdown for review; topic maintainers should update and merge HTML when it's ready to bake. On 2015-03-18 7:46 AM, Gabriel A. Devenyi wrote: Quick

Re: [Discuss] Handling Forgotten *.html Commits

2015-03-18 Thread Gabriel A. Devenyi
Excellent, I see my co-maintainer spearheaded this and even updated the repo contributing.md I'm talking about, serves me right for having 300 unread SWC emails... -- Gabriel A. Devenyi B.Eng. Ph.D. Research Computing Associate Computational Brain Anatomy Laboratory Cerebral Imaging Center

Re: [Discuss] Handling Forgotten *.html Commits

2015-03-18 Thread Karen Cranston
I vote to put the instructions in the README for the default branch (gh-pages). Note that the current README already has a link to the contribution guidelines, which contains the instructions about only committing the Markdown. Let's make the instructions as obvious as possible for new

Re: [Discuss] Handling Forgotten *.html Commits

2015-03-18 Thread W. Trevor King
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:44:59AM -0500, John Blischak wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Karen Cranston wrote: I vote to put the instructions in the README for the default branch (gh-pages). Note that the current README already has a link to the contribution guidelines, which