How Microsoft's Enterprise Desktop Stifles Linux and How to Fix it
http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/47511/index.html
Every time I read an article suggesting that Linux cannot budge Microsoft off
the Enterprise Desktop, I have a private laugh. If you knew what I did, you
would laugh too. The
Alex Janssen wrote:
I know this isn't the users list, but, I tried setting up a new database
to use the T-bird addressbook on my WinXP system and it came up blank.
It did not ask me for the location of the abook.
I had moved the tbird files from the default location to
Maybe then, Jonathan, we should re-name it to a Desktop Publishing, suite,
instead of an Office Suite.
Office suit implies everything you would use commonly ever day in your
office.
An office suite typicaly includes e-mail, an address book, and schedule, as
well as a project management
Rigel wrote:
An office suite typicaly includes e-mail, an address book, and schedule, as
well as a project management application, which hasn't been mentioned.
The only one of those items that can not be done within OOo 1.0.3 is email.
Unfortuntly, the templates for project mangement and
On 7 Nov 2005 at 9:15, Jonathon Blake wrote:
Chad wrote:
Why? - WHY?
Because it makes *SENSE* to, that's why.
It makes absolutely no sense to include an email client in an office
suite.
The main point is that M$ office does include an email client (Outlook). People
using it are
Chad Smith wrote:
Why? - WHY?
Because it makes *SENSE* to, that's why.
I thought we voted you out of here. Ah well.
The problem with your argument is that it simply doens't hold water. You
say you want to email something. Fine. Open your email program. Too
complicated? Fine. Use MS
Chad Smith wrote:
On 11/6/05, Daniel Kasak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Yes, I also use Thunderbird. But I would like to use something that was
integrated into open office like Outlook is in Microsoft Office.
Why?
Why? - WHY?
Because it
Daniel Kasak wrote:
Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Yes, I also use Thunderbird. But I would like to use something that was
integrated into open office like Outlook is in Microsoft Office.
Why?
Very good question.
Also, last time I looked, Outlook was very much a separate piece of
Jonathon Blake wrote:
Chad wrote:
Why? - WHY?
Because it makes *SENSE* to, that's why.
It makes absolutely no sense to include an email client in an office suite.
Well, it does seem to make sence to some people.
So I think it's a good idea to have CD's with an installation, that
offers
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:48:14 -, Daniel Kasak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Yes, I also use Thunderbird. But I would like to use something that was
integrated into open office like Outlook is in Microsoft Office.
Why?
I assume that he want to make OOo
Robbie Darrell Graham said the following on 11/06/2005 06:59 PM:
Let me first said I love what is happen in Open office.org. It about
time some one took on Microsoft the right way. But there needs to be
some more work done. I think for some one who works in an office you
need complete office
ing Chad Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/6/05, Daniel Kasak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Yes, I also use Thunderbird. But I would like to use something that was
integrated into open office like Outlook is in Microsoft Office.
Why?
Why? - WHY?
Because it makes
Robbie Darrell Graham said the following on 11/06/2005 06:59 PM:
Let me first said I love what is happen in Open office.org. It about
time some one took on Microsoft the right way. But there needs to be
some more work done. I think for some one who works in an office you
need complete office
Quoting Claus Agerskov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Yes, I also use Thunderbird. But I would like to use something that was
integrated into open office like Outlook is in Microsoft Office.
In what way is Microsoft Outlook integrated in Microsoft Office
Lately I have change a bit my tune the approach to e-mail. My motto has been
about OpenOffice.org is a productivity suite. Productivity means that you
produce something. However, 'Base' is not really a productivity suite and that
was the point when it break the analogy.
OpenOffice.org needs a
Hi Alex,
Just a quick comment.
Take your request, Robbie, for integration ...
Maybe if ...
* OOo could link to T-bird's address book with the database
functionality
http://dba.openoffice.org/FAQ/FAQ.html#evolution
points out that OOo already has an address book integration
Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Daniel Kasak wrote:
Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Let me first said I love what is happen in Open office.org. It about
time some one took on Microsoft the right way. But there needs to be
some more work done. I think for some one who works in an office you
need
Alex Janssen wrote:
Maybe if ...
* OOo could link to T-bird's address book with the database
functionality
It can already.
* T-bird could use OOo's dictionary
It does already.
* OOo could produce the appropriate html or text output and put it
into a Tbird
Mathias Bauer said the following on 11/08/2005 05:46 PM:
Alex Janssen wrote:
Maybe if ...
* OOo could link to T-bird's address book with the database
functionality
It can already.
* T-bird could use OOo's dictionary
It does already.
* OOo could
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Yes, I also use Thunderbird. But I would like to use something that was
integrated into open office like Outlook is in Microsoft Office.
In what way is Microsoft Outlook integrated in Microsoft Office that you
also want Thunderbird or another
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 19:45 -0500, Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Daniel Kasak wrote:
Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Let me first said I love what is happen in Open office.org. It about
time some one took on Microsoft the right way. But there needs to be
some more work done. I think for
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 00:53 -0500, Chad Smith wrote:
I understand that OpenOffice.org is holy, and perfect, and is not to be
questioned. If something is missing, it *SHOULD* be missing. If something
hogs memory, it *SHOULD* hog memory.
Go away Chad, and come back when you get rid of the
Chad wrote:
Why? - WHY?
Because it makes *SENSE* to, that's why.
It makes absolutely no sense to include an email client in an office suite.
spell-checker should draw from the same list of words.
That is what elm is for.
It makes sense that since email is mostly words, and text documents
Let me first said I love what is happen in Open office.org. It about
time some one took on Microsoft the right way. But there needs to be
some more work done. I think for some one who works in an office you
need complete office suite with out have the following. Word Processing,
Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Let me first said I love what is happen in Open office.org. It about
time some one took on Microsoft the right way. But there needs to be
some more work done. I think for some one who works in an office you
need complete office suite with out have the following.
Daniel Kasak wrote:
Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Let me first said I love what is happen in Open office.org. It about
time some one took on Microsoft the right way. But there needs to be
some more work done. I think for some one who works in an office you
need complete office suite with
Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Yes, I also use Thunderbird. But I would like to use something that was
integrated into open office like Outlook is in Microsoft Office.
Why?
--
Daniel Kasak
IT Developer
NUS Consulting Group
Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway
North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060
T:
On 11/6/05, Daniel Kasak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robbie Darrell Graham wrote:
Yes, I also use Thunderbird. But I would like to use something that was
integrated into open office like Outlook is in Microsoft Office.
Why?
Why? - WHY?
Because it makes *SENSE* to, that's why.
I
28 matches
Mail list logo
