Hi,
I have been having some trouble with one of my OOT custom blocks in GRC
(check this out:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2017-07/msg00225.html)
so I decided to try a bare bones version of the OOT module flow described
here:
On 07/16/2017 08:38 PM, Sean Horton wrote:
Hi Marcus,
I'm not getting overruns, and the signal source was the N210 (I was
doing a loopback test). I switched to a hardware radio to transmit
data, and the spikes went away. Is that what you'd expect? The spikes
were 2000-3000 samples apart. If
Hi Marcus,
Found the issue with command line you gave, namely
simple_ra is not the python file so I changed the line to
simple_ra_receiver and changed some of the command parameters as and got
it to run:
john@i7ubuntu:/usr/local/lib$ ls libgnuradio-osmosdr*.* -l -a
lrwxrwxrwx
Hi Marcus,
Thanks for your response. I'm trying to make a channel simulator where my
signal going into the USRP gets attenuated by free space path loss.
Typically, I know that this is done through the use of hardware, like fixed
attenuators, but I wanted to go into an all DSP approach with the
You can also check out the channel model block in GRC, there's also several
other useful blocks under the imparements category that may be useful for
modeling different kinds of environments like multipath or doppler.
On Jul 16, 2017 6:20 PM, "Jose Ruvalcaba" wrote:
> Hi
Hi Marcus,
I'm not getting overruns, and the signal source was the N210 (I was doing a
loopback test). I switched to a hardware radio to transmit data, and the
spikes went away. Is that what you'd expect? The spikes were 2000-3000
samples apart. If you don't think I should see those spikes even
Here is the system config:
vipin@pp001:~/a1/gr-howto/build$ uname -a
Linux pp001 4.8.0-58-generic #63~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 26 18:08:51 UTC
2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Vipin Sharma
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been having
On 17/07/17 03:08, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
On 07/16/2017 11:03 PM, John Shields wrote:
Hi Marcus,
An update - i reinstalled python-wxgtk2.8 and that
dependency was satisfied when I re-ran Marcus' build_gnuradio script.
When I run the same command as before, I
I can try re-building the OOT module.
I don't think I know how to 'with logging same-same as GR's'. I have
two questions:
1) How do I know how GR was built? With logging?
2) Assuming I know the answer to 1) above, where do I change things so that
OOT compiles with with same setting for
On 17/07/17 03:08, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
On 07/16/2017 11:03 PM, John Shields wrote:
Hi Marcus,
An update - i reinstalled python-wxgtk2.8 and that
dependency was satisfied when I re-ran Marcus' build_gnuradio script.
When I run the same command as before, I
On 07/17/2017 12:47 AM, John Shields wrote:
Even after I re-installed pyephem (for python 2) the
issue continues i.e. logger_tp undefined and malloc error. GRC is sane
in that I can instantiate a USRP source and display it's FFT.
Since the logger issue is a
I still continue to shoot in the dark to figure this SWIG issue. I decided
to run the 'make test' step as well (after 'sudo make install') step and as
expected it fails as well. Looking deeper a bit (using 'ctest -V' under
'build' directory), I see one of the symbols being undefined (see below for
Maybe you're hitting the logger_ptr bug? See <
https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/issues/1383[1] > for more info. It happens
when GR is built with logging enabled but not log4cpp, and then the OOT is
built either with logging enable and log4cpp or logging not enabled. The "free"
on gr::block
Hi Marcus,
An update - i reinstalled python-wxgtk2.8 and that
dependency was satisfied when I re-ran Marcus' build_gnuradio script.
When I run the same command as before, I now get:
john@i7ubuntu:~$ ./simp_10.sh
linux; GNU C++ version 5.4.0 20160609;
On 07/16/2017 11:03 PM, John Shields wrote:
Hi Marcus,
An update - i reinstalled python-wxgtk2.8 and that
dependency was satisfied when I re-ran Marcus' build_gnuradio script.
When I run the same command as before, I now get:
john@i7ubuntu:~$ ./simp_10.sh
Hi Jose,
yep, multiply const with a real value |·| < 1 would be **equivalent** to
an analog attenuator.
anyway, it's very uncommon to do such an operation in DSP, unless you
need a fair comparison between different signals or such.
Maybe you'd want to explain why you want to do that?
Best
Hi,
While I usually regret it, I decided to update my Ubuntu system from
14.04 LTS to 16.04 LTS and it seemed to go fine. I rebuilt GNURadio and
UHD and that seemed to go fine but when I run Simple_ra with:
simple_ra --aperture 2.4 --ant RX2 --srate 10.0e6 --dbw 8.0e6 --freq
1420.4057e6
Thanks Marcus,
I used the other Marcus' build_gnuradio script
and I believe that it rebuilt gr-osmosdr. How would I check?
I built 3.7.11.1 on July 7th on 14.04 LTS and
today, I rebuilt again on 16.04.
Kind
Hi John,
looks like the the problem /might/ (not sure) be that something tries to
access a different version of the python libraries than you use now –
so, seeing that simple_ra doesn't come with any code that needs to be
compiled itself, it does look like there might be a remnant of your
Hi John,
you could find the exact libosmosdr*.so that is used at runtime. Of
course, searching your filesystem for any libosmosdr* would be clever,
but it might be that you have multiple prefixes or so, so we might as
well make sure that at the time python actually starts loading
libraries,
20 matches
Mail list logo