Re: GNUstep paste board (Was: really attracting developers)

2006-08-28 Thread Chris B. Vetter
On 8/28/06, Charles Philip Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] It works for basic text, but not for other data types. I can't speak for other platforms, but on an X based system I think this should happen: (1) If a bitmap graphics is cut or copied, it should make a png copy to the X clipboard.

Re: GNUstep paste board (Was: really attracting developers)

2006-08-28 Thread Charles Philip Chan
On 2006-08-28 03:38:43 -0400 Chris B. Vetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, you CAN copy images using the pasteboard. I frequently use that functionality. Don't know about fonts, but I'm pretty sure it would be possible. Only between GNUstep apps. I just try a couple of experiments: (1)

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Andreas Höschler
Hello all, We need a project that will pull together existing efforts, create an easy installation/update environment, and encourage effort towards helping out on existing apps. Because those existing apps really do a tremendous job of covering many desktop needs: GWorkspace + appwrappers

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-08-28 03:03:28 +0200 Rogelio M. Serrano Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A new window manager needs to be written but then again its just a very big job. Is it really? All a _window_ manager has to do is _manage_ windows. That is, (create and) open them, move them around and (some way

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Gerold Rupprecht
On 2006-08-28 09:59:39 + Andreas Höschler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TextEdit TextEdit is close to useless for us since it is not able to read and write RTF files that can be read or have been written on a Mac with Apples TextEdit.app. Obviously the GNustep TextEdit cannot read the mac

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Charles Philip Chan
On 2006-08-28 05:59:39 -0400 Andreas Höschler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is Terminal.app of real use for anyone? We got it built on our Solaris machine but at least our version is rather buggy and unusable. ls list the files but does not show the bash prompt again. Strange, it must be a

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Peter Cooper
Is Terminal.app of real use for anyone? We got it built on our Solaris machine but at least our version is rather buggy and unusable. ls list the files but does not show the bash prompt again. Strange, it must be a Solaris specific problem. Terminal.app have been rock solid for me with no

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-08-28 13:43:08 +0200 Peter Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I suspect, like many things, it's an All-The-World-Is-Linux problem. [...] It is. After I copied the related line(s) from my FreeBSD's /etc/termcap over to my Solaris box, it worked. -- Chris

These NeXTbuntu guys

2006-08-28 Thread Fred Smith
...these NeXTbuntu guys are actually a group of first rate programmers. Check out some of their work here http://rixstep.com/4/0/index.shtml Yes, these are unix products aimed at OS X. Read some of Rick's stuff http://rixstep.com/2/20060627,00.shtml For the past year or so Rick initiated a

Re: Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Pete French
Why not give Azalea a try ? because I'd never heard of it - am happy to guive it a shot. All I am looking foir is something which looks as close to OpenStep as possible and works under amd64 with my GnuStep apps. -bat. (off to guve it a try) ___

Re: Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Pete French
Why not give Azalea a try ? Umm, silly question - but where can I download this from ? There's no FreeBSD port for Azalea or Etoile that I can find (not a good start) nor is there an obvious link from the etoile pages to download Azalea that I can find. If it's the window manager used for

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Rogelio Serrano
On 8/28/06, Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if the system become doc centered then all we need is the filesystem browser and about 3 other tiles. I'm not sure what you mean by doc-centred to be honest - unless you mean reducing the application choice to a kind of 'open with' context

Re: Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-08-28 14:58:27 +0200 Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why not give Azalea a try ? Umm, silly question - but where can I download this from ? There's no FreeBSD port for Azalea or Etoile that I can find (not a good start) nor is there an obvious link from the etoile pages to

These NeXTbuntu guys

2006-08-28 Thread Joachim Schulz
(sorry for sending this twice, correcting a yahoo snafu) ...these NeXTbuntu guys are actually a group of first rate programmers. Check out some of their work here http://rixstep.com/4/0/index.shtml Yes, these are unix products aimed at OS X. Read some of Rick's stuff

Re: Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Pete French
The screenshots on Etoile's Wiki look suspiciously like Window Maker. Ah, right... But here's one of Azalea: http://www.roard.com/screenshots/etoile-shot1.png Hmmm... that's a long way from a normal OpenStep desktop (why are the menu's horizontal? where did the dock go?). Am still happy

Re-install issues

2006-08-28 Thread Birch Browning
Hi guys,I had a working system, but I lost my mind and did clean reinstall as root using the compile-all script, just as I did the first time. Now I cannot start apps or tools as a regular user. Here's the error report:2006-08-28 09:32:09.269 Ink[15236] Exception occured while loading model:

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Adrian Robert
On Aug 28, 2006, at 7:43 AM, Peter Cooper wrote: I've been running Terminal.app on NetBSD for ages, and apart from some cosmetic issues that I can't easily fix because of the at- times-incomprehensible-genius of the authori, it's a very pleasant terminal environment that I use every day

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Andreas Höschler
On Montag, August 28, 2006, at 02:08 Uhr, Andreas Höschler wrote: By the way, if I want to drag a string (path) from my app to Terminal.app what pastboard type do I need to use? Is Terminal.app able to work as a drag target? Yes, Terminal.app can be a drop target. I use it all the time

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Charles Philip Chan
On 2006-08-28 08:08:31 -0400 Andreas Höschler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, any idea how the pasteboard is to be set up? In my application (drag source) I am doing I compare your code to that of GWorkspace.app and I can't seem to find anything wrong- I am at a lost. Maybe someone with more

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Charles Philip Chan
On 2006-08-28 09:55:49 -0400 Andreas Höschler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could anyone who has Terminal.app running on Solaris send me his Terminal.app sources? The most recent version of the Terminal.app source can be downloaded by doing: cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/backbone

Re: Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Charles Philip Chan
On 2006-08-28 09:36:12 -0400 Chris Vetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you're looking to a more NeXT'ish manager, try Afterstep or Bowman (not sure if the latter is still available) OR look around for NeXT'ish themes. There might be one for OpenBox, on which Azalea is based. I haven't

Re: Discuss-gnustep Digest, Vol 45, Issue 21

2006-08-28 Thread Michael Thaler
Whats keeping other developers from gnustep? incomplete ide? incomplete nextstep based system? incomplete libraries? i don't buy the general applications unavailability argument. we are talking about people who want to create apps under gnustep. I started developing for KDE because I

Re: really attracting developers

2006-08-28 Thread Doc O'Leary
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rogelio Serrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whats keeping other developers from gnustep? Depends on who those other developers are. I can only speak as someone who 10 years ago used GNUstep (such as it was) on Linux, but was drawn by commercial interests to focus

plugins or do?

2006-08-28 Thread Rogelio Serrano
im working with an iff formated file. whats the best way to handle the different media inside? use DO or plugins? -- things i hate about my linux pc: 1. it takes more than a second to boot up 2. keeps asking about filenames and directories 3. does not remember what i was working on yesterday 4.

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Markus Hitter wrote: Am 27.08.2006 um 21:23 schrieb Gregory John Casamento: Up until now we've had 4 or 5 projects playing at being the official desktop in an effort to fill the void. Yepp. And looking at NeXTbuntu and MidnightBSD, even full

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Andrew Sveikauskas
On 2006-08-28 07:43:08 -0400 Peter Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been running Terminal.app on NetBSD for ages, and apart from some cosmetic issues that I can't easily fix because of the at-times-incomprehensible-genius of the authori, it's a very pleasant terminal environment that I

Re: really attracting developers

2006-08-28 Thread Nikolaus Waxweiler
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:16:30 +0200, MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You've answered your own question. The wiki is not good enough yet, underattended and stumpy. Erm, moving as much stuff as possible to the wiki was my answer to the underattended and stumpy issue. Etoile and other projects

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Peter Cooper
Just for the record, speaking of the all the world is Linux problem, Terminal.app runs fine on OpenBSD, but I have to compile it with -D__NetBSD__ :P But this is not the latest SVN so it might have improved since last I built it. I may have submitted the NetBSD changes, sorry!

Re: really attracting developers

2006-08-28 Thread Riccardo
Hey, On Friday, August 25, 2006, at 01:57 PM, Chris Vetter wrote: On 2006-08-25 12:05:48 +0200 Rogelio Serrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whats keeping other developers from gnustep? That's the crucial question, isn't it? I think we had this thread before.. . and even before before

Re: GNUstep release procedure

2006-08-28 Thread Adam Fedor
On 2006-08-27 04:44:50 -0600 Gerold Rupprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have just been going through the mediawiki.gnustep.org to look at the state of the documentation and I noticed that it speaks alot about cvs. (see http://mediawiki.gnustep.org/index.php/GNUstep_release_procedure )

Re: really attracting developers

2006-08-28 Thread Riccardo
hmmm.. On Friday, August 25, 2006, at 07:12 PM, Chris Vetter wrote: without more ado then: http://nextbuntu.wordpress.com/ Looks to me like this guy is divorced from reality. do you know who that guys? He needs medical support. -R ___

Re: [Fwd: Re: really attracting developers]

2006-08-28 Thread Helge Hess
On Aug 27, 2006, at 17:51, Doc O'Leary wrote: Summary: having Cocoa compatibility (which is getting harder every day as MacOS advances, just think ObjC 2.0) for Linux is _not_ a selling point. The majority of Cocoa developers simply don't want to deploy their desktop applications to Linux/BSD.

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-28 Thread Riccardo
Hey, On Monday, August 28, 2006, at 01:43 AM, Pete French wrote: could have an entirely GNUStep system - and as a bonus it would quit when GSWorkspace exitted just like nextStep used to. you can already do that, just configure your x session properly: first launch wmaker as if it weere

Re: GNUstep paste board (Was: really attracting developers)

2006-08-28 Thread Fred Kiefer
Charles Philip Chan schrieb: On 2006-08-27 15:41:37 -0400 Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you please detail the problem you found with GNUstep paste board? At least in a Unix/Linux environment I would expect GNUstep to play nicely with other apps that follow the basic rules. If

Re: These NeXTbuntu guys

2006-08-28 Thread Joachim Schulz
GJC, I'm all for cooperation. However, that doesn't mean beginning a dialogue with a gesture of submission. Our intent was not to ignore GNUstep. I agree, our first contact was more like a fender bender. But clearly, GNUstep is not ready for prime time, not after 10 years of hard work and having

Re: GNUstep paste board (Was: really attracting developers)

2006-08-28 Thread Matt Rice
--- Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DND will be another big step. Here a whole rewrite is needed. When we tried to integrate GNUstep DND with X we did get it completely wrong the first time. a while back i tried getting gnustep to work as a x 'dragging source' as we call it.. it still

Re: Re: GNUstep paste board (Was: really attracting developers)

2006-08-28 Thread Nicolas Roard
On 8/28/06, Charles Philip Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2006-08-27 15:41:37 -0400 Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, here there is still much to do. The strange thing is that up to now people only rarely asked for this. Strange indeed since DND is used widely in NeXTStep. :-)

Re: These NeXTbuntu guys

2006-08-28 Thread Helge Hess
On Aug 28, 2006, at 22:28, Joachim Schulz wrote: I'm all for cooperation. However, that doesn't mean beginning a dialogue with a gesture of submission. Our intent was not to ignore GNUstep. I agree, our first contact was more like a fender bender. But clearly, GNUstep is not ready for prime

Re: These NeXTbuntu guys

2006-08-28 Thread Gregory John Casamento
Joachim, I'm all for cooperation. However, that doesn't mean beginning a dialogue with a gesture of submission. No one said that you guys should show a gesture of submission... far from it, only that you should try to build on what we already have built and not start from scratch since we are

Re: Re-install issues

2006-08-28 Thread Adam Fedor
On 2006-08-28 07:46:11 -0600 Birch Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I had a working system, but I lost my mind and did clean reinstall as root using the compile-all script, just as I did the first time. Now I cannot start apps or tools as a regular user. Here's the error report: