Stefan Bidigaray stefanbidi at gmail.com writes:
OK, I guess it was all me! I found out I wasn't build with glitz before, that
is, specifing --disable-glitz. Either way I picked up the glitz-glx1-dev
package and built with glitz... got the following error when trying to open
anything (used
Stefan Bidigaray schrieb:
OK, I guess it was all me! I found out I wasn't build with glitz
before, that is, specifing --disable-glitz. Either way I picked up the
glitz-glx1-dev package and built with glitz... got the following error
when trying to open anything (used SystemPreferences for
That's awesome news, but...
В Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:22:04 +0100, Nicola Pero написа:
[...] (which includes Linux FHS) [...]
[...]
Eg, let's say that you're on linux and want to test Linux FHS.
FHS is a standard for Unix-like operating systems and Linux is just
the kernel of GNU/Linux, the most
[...] (which includes Linux FHS) [...]
[...]
Eg, let's say that you're on linux and want to test Linux FHS.
FHS is a standard for Unix-like operating systems and Linux is just
the kernel of GNU/Linux, the most popular variant of GNU. GNU/Hurd
and GNU/kFreeBSD (at least in Debian) both
On Feb 16, 2007, at 05:22, Nicola Pero wrote:
IMPORTANT: Remember to run 'ldconfig' after installing each library!
I wonder whether this should be done by make install?
BTW: in most modern Linuxes you would just drop a file in /etc/
ld.so.conf.d/ instead of editing ld.so.conf.
Greets,
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 15.02.2007 um 15:32 schrieb Jeff Teunissen:
Why, why WHY in the name of all that is good should anyone in a
Free Software
project act professional?
Because we want GNUstep to be successful? Because that means GNUstep
has to be used
On 2/16/07, Helge Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder whether this should be done by make install?
BTW: in most modern Linuxes you would just drop a file in /etc/
ld.so.conf.d/ instead of editing ld.so.conf.
But not all! Pretty much any distro based on Slackware will have a single
file
Hello all,
this is my first attempt to build GNUstep on a Linux system, debian in
this case. On Solaris the sources build fine. On Debian I get
debian:/usr/src/core/base/Tools# make
Making all for tool autogsdoc...
/opt/GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/which_lib:
Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] In my messages, no matter how pissed I am, [...]
Pissed? Remember: don't drink and email. ;-)
http://www.peevish.co.uk/slang/p.htm
--
MJR/slef, trying to lighten stuff up on a Friday afternoon.
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
On Feb 16, 2007, at 15:42, Stefan Bidigaray wrote:
BTW: in most modern Linuxes you would just drop a file in /etc/
ld.so.conf.d/ instead of editing ld.so.conf.
But not all! Pretty much any distro based on Slackware will have a
single file called ld.so.conf in /etc. Since parts of Slackware
Andreas Höschler wrote:
Hello all,
this is my first attempt to build GNUstep on a Linux system, debian in
this case. On Solaris the sources build fine. On Debian I get
(...)
./shared_obj/autogsdoc.o(.text+0xb0): In function `main':
/usr/src/core/base/Tools/autogsdoc.m:711: undefined
Which version are you using ? Can you provide your configure options
and the configure results ?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Höschler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, February 16, 2007 3:46 pm
To: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Subject: Building base on debian
Hello all,
this is my
Are you sure that you don't have multiple conflicting gnustep-make
installations ? ;-)
If not, are you sure that your gnustep-make is up-to-date with your
gnustep-base ?
In conclusion, I suggest starting from scratch (ie, rm -Rf /opt/GNUstep,
rm -Rf /usr/GNUstep, rm -Rf /etc/GNUstep), making
On 2/16/07, Helge Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, so what? Thats why I wrote most and Linux ;-)
I just want to make sure not to cause confusion and just assume that
/etc/ld.so.conf.d exists to all modern linuxes! Of sources Slackware is not
what one would call modern, but there a lot of
Hi, Nicola.
On 2/16/07, Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are things that could be improved, and will hopefully be improved
with everyone's
constructive suggestions and comments. :-)
Great improvement! Thanks!
I would like to suggest another layout let's call it OpenStep.
The
I would like to suggest another layout let's call it OpenStep.
The base differences between GNUstep and OpenStep layouts are:
- there's no System directory. All files placed under / (Applications,
Tools, Library etc.)
- the same is for user directory layout (no GNUstep directory).
If
On 16 Feb 2007, at 15:54, Sergii Stoian wrote:
Hi, Nicola.
On 2/16/07, Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are things that could be improved, and will hopefully be
improved
with everyone's
constructive suggestions and comments. :-)
Great improvement! Thanks!
I would like to
On 2/16/07, Graham J Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16 Feb 2007, at 15:54, Sergii Stoian wrote:
Hi, Nicola.
On 2/16/07, Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are things that could be improved, and will hopefully be
improved
with everyone's
constructive suggestions and comments.
On that OPENSTEP layout, wouldn't it be better to have the user Defaults
directory in $HOME/Library/Defaults? I know it's a small thing, but that's
also how the GNUstep Filesystem Layout is described...
Also, I've never gone in depth in a Mac, but isn't it's filesystem layout
very much like the
On 2/16/07, Stefan Bidigaray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On that OPENSTEP layout, wouldn't it be better to have the user Defaults
directory in $HOME/Library/Defaults? I know it's a small thing, but that's
also how the GNUstep Filesystem Layout is described...
On OPENSTEP (it's running on a
Hello Nicola,
Are you sure that you don't have multiple conflicting gnustep-make
installations ? ;-)
If not, are you sure that your gnustep-make is up-to-date with your
gnustep-base ?
There indeed was some GNUstep stuff installed by aptitude.
In conclusion, I suggest starting from scratch
On 2/16/07, Sergii Stoian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On OPENSTEP (it's running on a virtual machine right now) preferences
saved in ~/.OpenStep dir. We can have ~/.GNUstep as Defaults dir.
And we can move GNUstep.conf into ~/.GNUstep also. What do you think?
Sounds good to me!
On that note,
On 16 Feb 2007, at 17:29, Stefan Bidigaray wrote:
What I actually meant was, isn't the Mac layout exactly like the
OPENSTEP
layout?
Not at all. OPENSTEP on the left, Mac on the right:
/NextApps /Applications
/NextAdmin (/Applications/Utilities, /System/Library/CoreServices, /
On 2/16/07, Graham J Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16 Feb 2007, at 17:29, Stefan Bidigaray wrote:
What I actually meant was, isn't the Mac layout exactly like the
OPENSTEP
layout?
Not at all. OPENSTEP on the left, Mac on the right:
/NextApps /Applications
/NextAdmin
Hi all,
I finally managed to get GNUstep to build on Debian, also our code
depending on GNUstep. We have a loadable bundle that depends on
FBAccess (a framework) which again depends on FBCAccess (a library
supplied by FrontBase, Inc.). This library is installed in
/usr/lib/FrontBase/lib on
On 15 Feb 2007, at 20:21, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
In my messages, no matter how pissed I am, except in very extreme
circumstances, I try to be always measured in my response on the
public mailing list. I try to treat people with respect (even if
I am sometimes a bit sarcastic), and
26 matches
Mail list logo
