Carlos,
You might find something in this lesson useful
https://bic-berkeley.github.io/psych-214-fall-2016/arrays_and_images.html
There are also three exercises in the parent lesson,
https://bic-berkeley.github.io/psych-214-fall-2016/day_01.html
As others have said, possibly not
Tiffany,
You might experiment with some smallish databases. The order of
records may well change significantly from dump to dump, making the
apparent differences and the actual differences between any two dumps
appear much larger than they really are.
Good luck!
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:49
Where possible, we used to keep transaction logs in addition to
database dumps. Those can be replayed from the dumped database state
to replay the transactions up to any point by copying and editing the
transaction log(s).
My best recollection is that they are text and would be suitable for
Kevin,
Nice summary; thank you.
It is yet another thing to learn in a short time. I am not a notebook
fan, and I remember attending two workshops at a conference that were
notebook based -- those were my first real experience with notebooks
-- and I had more questions about the mechanics of
Carol,
I don't think anyone is saying, "Tell people not to use notebooks."
The questions are about whether they improve the learning experience
for beginners. There is also the question of whether use of the GUI
somehow defeats the purpose of the shell lesson by contradicting what
is often said
Lex,
It could be a noun. People refer to a sing-along as an event; I have been
invited to some other musical play-alongs aimed at beginning
instrumentalists. Probably worth defining once, then use it well. :-)
-- bennet
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 10:23 AM Lex Nederbragt
wrote:
> Thanks for
Agreed.
Slack is not a good place for persistent, open conversations that will
end up shaping how lessons, code, and policies are implemented. At my
day job, we have several years of lost conversations, policy
decisions, and links to useful things that disappeared into the
history that isn't
Please do post the content and let us know where to retrieve it. Sounds
quite interesting.
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 8:49 PM Dave Millman wrote:
> Unfortunately, not this iteration but we will post the content. If the
> workshop is successful, we hope to do more of them and can look into
>
It's very 'pre merge', but the old three-letter acronym 'SWC' was
fairly unique, fairly informative, and fairly short. Would it be out
of court to suggest resuscitating that for this purpose?
One other possibility would be to simply replace 'discuss' with 'carpentry'?
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at
