On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Kaustav Dhar kaustav.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Sir,
I want to get some smple source code so that I can start my own web GIS
application developement.
the osgeo.org portal has links to hosted projects. From there you have
access to source code.
--
Paulo Marcondes
Hello,
I am interested is there any reliable open source, LGPL licensed GIS SDK
or library suited for building
commercial, platform independent GIS application on top of it.
I am also interested for commercial solutions but only as SDK or library.
I will appreciate any help.
Best regards.
On 5-May-09, at 6:07 AM, Nenad Milasinovic wrote:
I am interested is there any reliable open source, LGPL licensed
GIS SDK or library suited for building commercial, platform
independent GIS application on top of it.
I am also interested for commercial solutions but only as SDK or
library.
Nenad,
The OSGeo projects use a variety of licenses. You'll see LGPL, MPL, GPL,
MIT, and others. If you are developing commercial tools, you'll need to
avoid GPL (someone correct me if I'm wrong.)
Also take into consideration development platform/language.
My group (MapWindow project) has a
IANAL either, but I do read wikipedia. So by way of clarification...
Everything I've read makes a clear distinction between GPL and LGPL such
that GPL code can not be embedded in or linked to a closed source
application. Period. Whereas L-GPL licensed code can be linked to a closed
source
* Apologies for the cross-postings*
Hello All,
We had a server problem with registrations over the Bank Holiday
weekend, so could i request anyone who tried to register for OSGIS 2009
between 30 April - 5 May 2009 to register again at the conference
website http://www.opensourcegis.org.uk/
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:24:47AM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Daniel Ames amesd...@isu.edu wrote:
Nenad,
The OSGeo projects use a variety of licenses. You'll see LGPL, MPL, GPL,
MIT, and others. If you are developing commercial tools, you'll need to
avoid GPL
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:33:40AM -0600, Daniel Ames wrote:
IANAL either, but I do read wikipedia. So by way of clarification...
Everything I've read makes a clear distinction between GPL and LGPL such
that GPL code can not be embedded in or linked to a closed source
application. Period.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Daniel Ames amesd...@isu.edu wrote:
IANAL either, but I do read wikipedia. So by way of clarification...
Everything I've read makes a clear distinction between GPL and LGPL such
that GPL code can not be embedded in or linked to a closed source
application.
Hi,
Some more precision.
Let's say ShapeLib is published under GPL (I don't know
whether or not it is; this is only for illustration purpose).
Let's say, MapServer utilizes ShapeLib, but doesn't modify
ShapeLib, but uses ShapeLib as is. Let's say, MapServer's
creator decides to make
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:55:47AM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Daniel Ames amesd...@isu.edu wrote:
IANAL either, but I do read wikipedia. So by way of clarification...
Everything I've read makes a clear distinction between GPL and LGPL such
that GPL code can not
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Christopher Schmidt
crschm...@crschmidt.net wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:55:47AM -0500, P Kishor wrote:
..
Thanks Dan (and Christopher and others), I see the distinction now
between GPL and LGPL. However, I am reading the actual GPL text and
its extensive
Here is a concrete example:
I believe OpenJUMP plug-ins must be released under the GPL, because they
are dynamically loaded and share data structures with the core program.
This is a good discussion. Thanks. :]
On a side note: I believe that UDig is released under the LGPL and it is
But if he wants to keep his code under some closed-source license then he
can
not link to or embed any GPL licensed code or library.
Whence licence exceptions e.g. in ExtJS
(http://extjs.com/products/floss-exception.php) to allow using ExtJS
(GPL) with an application/library that is
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 01:47:32PM -0400, Yves Moisan wrote:
But if he wants to keep his code under some closed-source license then he
can
not link to or embed any GPL licensed code or library.
Whence licence exceptions e.g. in ExtJS
-Message d'origine-
De : discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-
boun...@lists.osgeo.org] De la part de Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo)
Envoyé : mardi 5 mai 2009 18:00
À : OSGeo Discussions
Objet : Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] GIS_Libraries
On 5-May-09, at 6:07 AM, Nenad Milasinovic wrote:
Thanks Tyler,
I am looking for Java GIS library, which is capable of working with various
geospatial data
formats: ESRI shapefiles, KML, GML, PostGis, GeoTiff etc.
I am looking for library that is quite stable and with remarkable rendering
capabilities, panning and zooming.
I want to define
I already look at Geotools library, and i am looking for something
similar but with better rendering performance.
I don't think such an open source project exists, at least not under the
LGPL. A couple of other projects you could check out are gvSIG and the
IGeoDesktop from the deegree Project.
I'm curious and I have seen the GNU libc license, and it's obviously GPL.
According to this thread, if I have well understood the GPL, all software
linked with glibc are licensed under GPL ?
I had seen
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#PortProgramToGL wich
suggest that a
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:09:50PM +0200, Cuinet Jérôme wrote:
I'm curious and I have seen the GNU libc license, and it's obviously GPL.
It's not GPL, it's LGPL.
Released under the GNU Lesser General Public License, glibc is free
software.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_C_Library
Yeah !
I found the flaw :
There is two files in glibc folder, COPYING and COPYING.LIB.
COPYING is the GPL text.
COPYING.LIB is the LGPL text.
Logic !
And the presence of the license text don't mean that the software is under
that license. The mention that means what license is to be applied
21 matches
Mail list logo
