Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign proposal

Thank you all for your suggestions and feedback. We'll have a week of campaigning and discussion once the candidates list is closed. I've added a section for this on the elections page[1] and created a page following last year template[2]. I'd ask candidates that once they are happy with their

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign proposal

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Jorge Sanz wrote: > > The other point of this email is to follow up with Gert-Jan > proposal[2] to put a week between the nominations period and the > actual voting to let candidates to express their intentions for their > term. > Strong +1

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign proposal

; Cc: OSGeo Discussions > Asunto: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign > proposal > > Jorge Sanz: > >>Dear OSGeo community and charter members >> >>This is a reminder that there's still some days for nominations to the >>Board of

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign proposal

oun...@lists.osgeo.org> en nombre de Nikos Alexandris <n...@nikosalexandris.net> Enviado: viernes, 16 de setiembre de 2016 3:39 Para: Jorge Sanz Cc: OSGeo Discussions Asunto: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign proposal Jorge Sanz: >Dear OSGeo community and

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign proposal

FWIW, as a "non-interested party" which is interested in the candidates visions, I would support the addition of a week of campaining before the votes. And I like Nikos' suggestion of starting it with every candidate answering the question "What should the community expect from my board

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign proposal

On 16 September 2016 at 12:43, Massimiliano Cannata wrote: > dear Jorge, > I remember this was done also for past elections. > It is not mandatory of course, but i agree it should be nice to have this > short paragraph that allows for a presentation and a vision ;-)

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign proposal

dear Jorge, I remember this was done also for past elections. It is not mandatory of course, but i agree it should be nice to have this short paragraph that allows for a presentation and a vision ;-) Maybe we could have a dedicated wiki page for that? maxi 2016-09-16 9:45 GMT+02:00 Jorge Sanz

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign proposal

On 16 September 2016 at 08:29, María Arias de Reyna wrote: > Hi, > > I think campaining a week is a good idea. But as an interested party, > maybe it is better to let others decide :) > On the contrary, as an interested party I was expecting candidates opinion :-) --

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign proposal

Jorge Sanz: Dear OSGeo community and charter members This is a reminder that there's still some days for nominations to the Board of Directors elections. We have already nine great candidates, including all the present Board members running for re-election. Take a look at [1] for an overview

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign proposal

Hi, I think campaining a week is a good idea. But as an interested party, maybe it is better to let others decide :) On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Jorge Sanz wrote: > Dear OSGeo community and charter members > > This is a reminder that there's still some days for nominations

[OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Nominations reminder and campaign proposal

Dear OSGeo community and charter members This is a reminder that there's still some days for nominations to the Board of Directors elections. We have already nine great candidates, including all the present Board members running for re-election. Take a look at [1] for an overview of the