discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses.
http://incubator.apache.org http://incubator.apache.org/
http://incubator.apache.org
@lists.osgeo.org discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses.
http://incubator.apache.org http://incubator.apache.org/
http
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses.
http
, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses
Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses.
http://incubator.apache.org http
__
From: Bart van den Eijnden [bart...@osgis.nl
mailto:bart...@osgis.nl]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses.
http
7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses
: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses.
http://incubator.apache.org
Best regards,
Bart
On 04 Mar 2015, at 23:25, Vaclav Petras
wenzesl...@gmail.commailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com
, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses.
http
?
Suchith
From: Bart van den Eijnden [bart...@osgis.nl]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses.
http://incubator.apache.org
Best regards,
Bart
On 04 Mar 2015, at 23:25, Vaclav
]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about
?
Suchith
From: Bart van den Eijnden [bart...@osgis.nl]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing
[jachym.cepi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:27 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: OSGeo Discussions; incuba...@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
Vašku,
just side note: yes, whith the new Labs initiative OSGeo-Labs have
to change their name
To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
(we are approaching 2 full years that this labs naming has been an
issue and discussed[1])
Today, knowing how ingrained the term 'lab' is in the GeoForAll
education network, maybe Jachym is correct that it is a good time
mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:26 PM
To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
(we are approaching 2 full years that this labs naming has been an
issue and discussed[1])
Today
[jachym.cepi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:27 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: OSGeo Discussions; incuba...@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
Vašku,
just side note: yes, whith the new Labs initiative OSGeo-Labs have to
change their name.
My idea
, March 03, 2015 7:27 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: OSGeo Discussions; incuba...@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
Vašku,
just side note: yes, whith the new Labs initiative OSGeo-Labs have to
change their name.
My idea would rather be to get rid of current OSGeo- labs
From: Jachym Cepicky jachym.cepi...@gmail.com
To: Vaclav Petras wenzesl...@gmail.com
Cc: OSGeo Discussions discuss@lists.osgeo.org,
incuba...@lists.osgeo.org incuba...@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
Vašku,
just side note: yes, whith the new Labs initiative
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On
Behalf Of Jachym Cepicky [jachym.cepi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:27 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: OSGeo Discussions; incuba...@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation
Vašku,
just side note: yes, whith the new Labs initiative OSGeo-Labs have to
change their name.
My idea would rather be to get rid of current OSGeo- labs and projects
and start with new OSGeo-projects and metioned star (or similar) rating
system.
Than for current OSGeo-Labs OSGeo-project level
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky jachym.cepi...@gmail.com
wrote:
former OSGeo Labs (now it has no name is slowly forgotten in past, but
you can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs)
Hi Jachym,
do you think that with the renewal you can replace the name OSGeo Labs
I think we could Vaclav. One of the more extreme ideas I have had is to
just call it incubation and only assign mentors when a project has
completed each of the five things we expect and wants a review /
recommendation. It would free us up to take on more projects (no longer
bottle necked on
Hi Jachym,
I think this is a good idea.
Also to include in this discussion is streamlining our existing
incubation docs. In particular, retire General Principles of
Incubation [1], update our Project Graduation Checklist [2], and
update our Incubator Application Questionnaire [3]. The links
On 2/16/2015 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
Hi,
I would like to dig a bit more into the topic more fine incubation
procedure and former OSGeo Labs (now it has no name is slowly
forgotten in past, but you can find more at
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs)
I would like to start talk about
26 matches
Mail list logo
