Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-29 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:56:16PM -0300, Jeff McKenna wrote: > On 2017-03-21 12:19 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > > > > > >RE: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo > > Yes the FOSS4G-Boston site is in OSGeo Gogs (at >

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-27 Thread Jeff McKenna
On 2017-03-21 12:19 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote: I think foss4g website (or was it just video?) is also using Gogs. Jeff ? RE: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo Hi Sandro! Yes the FOSS4G-Boston site is in OSGeo Gogs (at

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-23 Thread Vicky Vergara
Added a line for pgRouting On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > +1 Greatly insightful slide deck from Maxi about Open principles in > general and OSGeo in particular. Thanks for sharing. > > Cameron > > On 22/3/17 4:02 am, Jody Garnett wrote: > >

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-21 Thread Cameron Shorter
+1 Greatly insightful slide deck from Maxi about Open principles in general and OSGeo in particular. Thanks for sharing. Cameron On 22/3/17 4:02 am, Jody Garnett wrote: That is a *great* talk, and shows a lot of areas where we can improve. There has been a consistent call for "incubation"

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-21 Thread Jody Garnett
That is a *great* talk, and shows a lot of areas where we can improve. There has been a consistent call for "incubation" to continue to hold projects accountable to OSGeo standards. I have resisted these calls as I view incubation as an outreach activity - part of our mission to promote

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-21 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:56:49PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > On 20 March 2017 at 21:02, Cameron Shorter wrote: > > I've added a line for OSGeo-Live > > FYI, I only walked through the ones in the "OSGeo Projects" frame at > osgeo.org. I think foss4g website (or

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-21 Thread Venkatesh Raghavan
Maxi also made an excelling presentation on related topic at FOSS4G-Asia 2017. The presentation is available at http://www.slideshare.net/cannata/massimiliano-cannata-keynote-foss4gasia-2017 Best Venka On 2017/03/20 22:08, Jeff McKenna wrote: Actually Maxi and I did a recent thorough research

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-20 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 20 March 2017 at 21:02, Cameron Shorter wrote: > I've added a line for OSGeo-Live FYI, I only walked through the ones in the "OSGeo Projects" frame at osgeo.org. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-20 Thread Cameron Shorter
I've added a line for OSGeo-Live Cameron On 20/3/17 11:15 am, Jody Garnett wrote: Thanks. Any idea how much strain the maven repo puts on OSGeo infrastructure? On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 4:57 PM Mateusz Loskot > wrote: On 20 March 2017 at

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-20 Thread Jeff McKenna
Actually Maxi and I did a recent thorough research into OSGeo project use of infrastructure, by each project, and it was published as a paper (or soon to be). In the short term I know Maxi has submitted it as a talk for FOSS4G-Europe. It's good to take a step back and review old processes.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-19 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks. Any idea how much strain the maven repo puts on OSGeo infrastructure? On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 4:57 PM Mateusz Loskot wrote: > On 20 March 2017 at 00:46, Jody Garnett wrote: > > Geotools SVN has been migrated. The repo is just for historical

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-19 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 20 March 2017 at 00:46, Jody Garnett wrote: > Geotools SVN has been migrated. The repo is just for historical record. Fixed. Thanks Jody. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ Discuss mailing list

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-19 Thread Jody Garnett
Geotools SVN has been migrated. The repo is just for historical record. The geotools downloads host a maven repository to which release are published. On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 4:39 PM Mateusz Loskot wrote: > On 20 March 2017 at 00:13, Tom Kralidis

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-19 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 20 March 2017 at 00:13, Tom Kralidis wrote: > > Thanks Mateusz: great idea and thanks for leading off. > > I've made slight updates for pycsw. Should we > have a column for use of servers like AdhocVM[1] ? Tom, good idea. I briefely contemplated CI column with list of

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Wiki: InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo - call for update

2017-03-19 Thread Tom Kralidis
Thanks Mateusz: great idea and thanks for leading off. I've made slight updates for pycsw. Should we have a column for use of servers like AdhocVM[1] ? ..Tom [1] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/AdhocVM On Sun, 19 Mar 2017, Mateusz Loskot wrote: Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 23:31:11 +0100 From: