During the last meeting we discussed details about how the limit works.
I just want to voice my opinion on how the limit should work:
I strongly believe we should make the limit sacrosanct and not touch it
*never ever*. A decision by the user to set a monthly limit trumps
"hidden costs" always, no
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:05 PM, mray wrote:
During the last meeting we discussed details about how the limit
works.
I just want to voice my opinion on how the limit should work:
I strongly believe we should make the limit sacrosanct and not touch
it
*never ever*. A decision by the user to se
On 08/02/2016 05:05 PM, mray wrote:
> During the last meeting we discussed details about how the limit works.
> I just want to voice my opinion on how the limit should work:
>
> I strongly believe we should make the limit sacrosanct and not touch it
> *never ever*. A decision by the user to set a
When are transaction fees charged? When you add money or when it is
assigned to a project?
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 08/02/2016 05:05 PM, mray wrote:
>> During the last meeting we discussed details about how the limit works.
>> I just want to voice my opinion on how
On 08/02/2016 05:58 PM, James Sheldon wrote:
> When are transaction fees charged? When you add money or when it is
> assigned to a project?
>
This is assuming a charge-in-arrears approach where we avoid holding
money which has all sorts of legal challenges once we go beyond our one
project. So,
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
On 08/02/2016 05:58 PM, James Sheldon wrote:
When are transaction fees charged? When you add money or when it is
assigned to a project?
This is assuming a charge-in-arrears approach where we avoid holding
money which has all sorts of legal
I could go either way on that, then, as long as we disclose it. I
mean, if I set a $20 maximum it could mean before fees or after fees,
but we just need to let users know which one we choose.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Aaron Wolf wrot
I have thoughts now!
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
On 08/02/2016 05:05 PM, mray wrote:
During the last meeting we discussed details about how the limit
works.
I just want to voice my opinion on how the limit should work:
I strongly believe we should make the limit sac
On 08/02/2016 06:48 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
> I think the cleanest initial way to go is "No more than $limit will be
> added to your outstanding balance each month." That is, carried over
> matches should *not* be counted towards your monthly limit, but fees
> should, in their entirety.
>
Well
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Aaron Wolf
wrote:
On 08/02/2016 06:48 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
I think the cleanest initial way to go is "No more than $limit will
be
added to your outstanding balance each month." That is, carried over
matches should *not* be counted towards your monthly
On 08/02/2016 07:13 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> On 08/02/2016 06:48 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
>>
>>> I think the cleanest initial way to go is "No more than $limit will be
>>> added to your outstanding balance each month." That is, carried o
11 matches
Mail list logo
