Re: [AFFUG Discuss] crossdomain.xml

2009-07-13 Thread eric decoff
Charlie - Can ping from 10.10.10.10 to 75.75.75.75 Can ping from 75.75.75.75 to 10.10.10.10 even tried this crossdomain.xml ?xml version=1.0? !DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy SYSTEM http://www.macromedia.com/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd; cross-domain-policy site-control

[AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps

2009-07-13 Thread robertlash
I am planning an application and was wondering how others that use mate handle large event maps. I there a best practice out there for this? One large map or multiple maps? Thanks RL - To unsubscribe from this list, simply

Re: [AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps

2009-07-13 Thread robertlash
Sorry typing too fast. Is there a standard for large event maps. RL - Original Message - From: robertl...@comcast.net To: a discussion@affug.com Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 2:29:15 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps I am planning an

Re: [AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps

2009-07-13 Thread James Schneider
I think the best use practice is to separate you event maps into logical maps by function. Have an event map for service calls, for example. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 13, 2009, at 2:29 PM, robertl...@comcast.net wrote: I am planning an application and was wondering how others that use

Re: [AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps

2009-07-13 Thread Robert Lash
Thanks for the info Sent from my iPhone On Jul 13, 2009, at 2:35 PM, James Schneider jed.schnei...@gmail.com wrote: I think the best use practice is to separate you event maps into logical maps by function. Have an event map for service calls, for example. Sent from my iPhone On Jul

Re: [AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps

2009-07-13 Thread John Mason
Agree, having just one map will drive you nuts at some point. John James Schneider wrote: I think the best use practice is to separate you event maps into logical maps by function. Have an event map for service calls, for example. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 13, 2009, at 2:29 PM,

Re: [AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps

2009-07-13 Thread Tom McNeer
I think you'll find logical points to create new maps as your original map(s) expand. I'm working on a project now where I have a single ServiceEventMap, as suggested in the Mate documentation and in the notes here. But I can tell that I need to break it down further, perhaps to the point of using

Re: [AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps

2009-07-13 Thread Cameron Childress
+1 On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Jed Schneiderjed.schnei...@gmail.com wrote: As an aside, how many folks on this list are using Mate? I am. -- Cameron Childress Sumo Consulting Inc http://www.sumoc.com --- cell: 678.637.5072 aim: cameroncf email: camer...@gmail.com

RE: [AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps

2009-07-13 Thread Holly Jones
Also using Mate! Holly Jones Director of Web Development Walls Media, Inc. ho...@wallsmedia.com mailto:hol...@wallsmedia.com _ From: ad...@affug.org [mailto:ad...@affug.org] On Behalf Of Jed Schneider Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 2:36 PM To: discussion@affug.com Subject:

Re: [AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps

2009-07-13 Thread John Mason
+1 There are probably several of us. Cairngorm will always be around, but for new projects I have always chosen Mate. John Holly Jones wrote: Also using Mate! Holly Jones Director of Web Development Walls Media, Inc. ho...@wallsmedia.com mailto:hol...@wallsmedia.com

Re: [AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps

2009-07-13 Thread robertlash
Wow Great responses :) RL - Original Message - From: John Mason ma...@fusionlink.com To: discussion@affug.com Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 3:53:00 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps +1 There are probably several of us. Cairngorm will

Re: [AFFUG Discuss] Mate event maps

2009-07-13 Thread Brandon Alexander
I've been looking for a reason to use/learn Mate and I finally got a new project to start on. Otherwise, I've used Cairngorm and things like Cairngorm in the past. Brandon On Jul 13, 2009, at 3:53 PM, John Mason wrote: +1 There are probably several of us. Cairngorm will always be around,