Re: FSFE and proof

2019-10-17 Thread Jean Louis
* wikile...@mailo.com [2019-10-17 03:06]: > > On 16/10/2019 17:25:40 Europe/Paris Jean Louis wrote: > > > File not found. Better link? > > oopsie, try again > > https://www5.zippyshare.com/v/7dKJ52VQ/file.html That is insightful. The corruption lies in "open source", it has corrupted true

Re: FSFE and proof

2019-10-17 Thread ahilter
Oct 17, 2019, 07:07 by bugs@gnu.support: * wikile...@mailo.com [2019-10-17 03:06]: On 16/10/2019 17:25:40 Europe/Paris Jean Louis wrote: > File not found. Better link? oopsie, try again https://www5.zippyshare.com/v/7dKJ52VQ/file.html That is insightful. I've exposed another liar, another

Who do we believe?

2019-10-17 Thread ahilter
I read the long mail from MBR and it's a good story. The problem is that everyone here has good stories. I'm not saying that MBR lies, but there are few things in its story that you couldn't invent. I believe him, but the situation is difficult. Daniel has a good story (especially

Re: FSFE and proof

2019-10-17 Thread ahilter
Oct 16, 2019, 20:59 by garfi...@tutanota.de: When cats grin like that, our owners think it is cute Don't tell anybody that is the smile after we kill something, ha ha Do you think it has something to do with the will and testament plan Daniel mentioned? Do you think they are murdering each

Re: FSFE and proof

2019-10-17 Thread ahilter
Oct 16, 2019, 21:35 by wikile...@mailo.com: On 16/10/2019 17:25:40 Europe/Paris Jean Louis wrote: File not found. Better link? You're dumber than a piece of shit if you can't even send a working link. What's wrong with your brain? Or don't you have one? No, then you would be dead. But maybe you

Re: on SJWs and feminists

2019-10-17 Thread RMS Support
18 Oct 2019, 00:01 by dan...@pocock.pro: > Bradley Kuhn and I both received part of our education in Jesuit > institutions. Social justice is an important part of the Jesuit tradition. I am disappointed that you put yourself on the same level as the traitor Bradley Kuhn. He stabbed RMS in the

Re: Some facts

2019-10-17 Thread discussion
Oct 17, 2019, 12:38 by anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de: Hello, who is interested will find some information about legal issues here: https://fsfe.org/about/legal/legal.html The 2019 minutes are not published yet. When they will be published, it is possible to check them at the registration

Re: Some facts

2019-10-17 Thread Dr. Michael Stehmann
Hello, it is so simple: When the minutes are published, everybody can - assess, whether the "draft" is a fake or not and - check the minutes at the registration court. Than everybody, who likes to, may blame the FSFE because of the decisions on that GA. Than (s)he is able to argue with facts,

Re: Some facts

2019-10-17 Thread ahilter
I'm sorry, I chose bad words. English is not my mother tongue and in my family we say "gas" when we fart in someone's face. Several people contacted me and told me that my words sounded like mass murder. I'm sorry about that.  I really just wanted to talk about farting and I was hoping that

Re: fuck FSF*

2019-10-17 Thread ahilter
The FSFE GA is over. It will never be forgotten by those of us who have fought and worked and lived anyway. It was the most difficult year yet for Free Software, one that subjected us to great moral and material tests. It gave us the task to keep what we had conquered in our glorious offensives

Re: Some facts

2019-10-17 Thread ahilter
Oct 17, 2019, 14:06 by anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de: Are you so impatient, that you can not wait? Why do you keep trying to slow down our war effort, you miserable rabble? When times were even better, people like you would have been gassed for attacking our leader! Daniel is untouchable and

Re: FSFE GA minutes, fake or proof? (was: Fwd: Joint statement on the GNU Project + gnu-system-discuss)

2019-10-17 Thread Jean Louis
* Lori Nagel [2019-10-17 18:30]: > I can see them extending the terms on president and vice president > especially if they are meeting up in person.  I mean, what a pain, > all get somewhere in Europe to meet. We need better free software > video conferencing solutions. > As far as cutting the

Re: fuck FSF*

2019-10-17 Thread Dr. Michael Stehmann
Am 17.10.19 um 14:57 schrieb wiki.le...@mailo.com: > Another broken link: > > https://fsfe.org/about/legal/constitution.en.html > Try this one: https://fsfe.org/about/legal/Constitution.en.pdf (It is a PDF.) Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: FSFE GA minutes, fake or proof? (was: Fwd: Joint statement on the GNU Project + gnu-system-discuss)

2019-10-17 Thread garfield
Oct 17, 2019, 10:08 by bugs@gnu.support: > * Daniel Pocock [2019-10-17 15:19]: > >> It seems incredible that a bunch of 11 people travel to Essen to >> have a meeting and pass motions like this. We just have to wait and >> see when FSFE makes an official publication on their web site, they

fuck FSF*

2019-10-17 Thread wiki . leaks
https://framadrop.org/r/O3SRHBIoMF#fBOkRgUPcg13YyQRNMQKLc0iTiDg0S6O+u82HR8OUpg= The plot thickens. Smoking gun. People resigning in disgust. Another broken link: https://fsfe.org/about/legal/constitution.en.html Coincidence? ___ Discussion

Some facts

2019-10-17 Thread Dr. Michael Stehmann
Hello, who is interested will find some information about legal issues here: https://fsfe.org/about/legal/legal.html The 2019 minutes are not published yet. When they will be published, it is possible to check them at the registration court in Hamburg, Germany (Amtsgericht Hamburg VR

Re: FSFE GA minutes, fake or proof? (was: Fwd: Joint statement on the GNU Project + gnu-system-discuss)

2019-10-17 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 17/10/2019 07:51, wikile...@mailo.com wrote: > > On 17/10/2019 00:39:54 Europe/Paris Jean Louis wrote: > >> RMS was smart > > rms was deleted > > now you have it > > ultimate humiliation > Thanks for sharing. If this is fake news it is very well made, somebody should get a prize for

Re: FSFE GA minutes, fake or proof? (was: Fwd: Joint statement on the GNU Project + gnu-system-discuss)

2019-10-17 Thread Jean Louis
* Daniel Pocock [2019-10-17 15:19]: > It has some mistakes in it though so maybe it is fake. It also strikes > me as odd that any organization could pass motions changing the quota > requirements so dramatically without any opposition from members. Process is similar to corporations, and it is

Re: FSFE GA minutes, fake or proof? (was: Fwd: Joint statement on the GNU Project + gnu-system-discuss)

2019-10-17 Thread garfield
Oct 17, 2019, 14:12 by bugs@gnu.support: > > Basically now they are afraid of Daniel Pocock as well, and wish to > sue him for reasons of informing public. > Matthias Kirschner and Florian Snow are dressing up in policeman uniforms again Oh no Firemen uniforms are better, they rescue cats

FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?

2019-10-17 Thread Daniel Pocock
Hi all, Two different documents appeared today claiming to be minutes of the FSFE e.V. annual meeting I haven't compared them line by line to see if they are the same. The second document also appears to contain two resignation emails. I've heard that there have actually been more

Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?

2019-10-17 Thread Henning Thielemann
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Roland Häder wrote: Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a specific sender? Starting to become anoying what this one (you know who) writes. To much BS for me. I guess the most simple way is to configure a filter rule in your e-mail

Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?

2019-10-17 Thread RMS Support
Oct 17, 2019, 20:04 by rol...@mxchange.org: > Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a > specific sender? Starting to become annoying what this one (you know who) > writes. To much BS for me. I cannot understand why people like you want to block valid opinions. I

Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?

2019-10-17 Thread RMS Support
17. Okt. 2019, 22:21 von dan...@pocock.pro: anonymous identities on this email list. We can all thank Cryptie for her leadership in the use of anonymity, she was first and I won't be the one to compromise her real name. He he, that is ironic as you told us the truth about her name already. I

Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?

2019-10-17 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 17/10/2019 21:26, Jean Louis wrote: > * Daniel Pocock [2019-10-18 01:28]: >> The second document also appears to contain two resignation emails. >> I've heard that there have actually been more resignations than >> that. > > So you also say that those could be real. > > I have published

Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?

2019-10-17 Thread Roland Häder
On 10/17/2019 10:15 PM, Henning Thielemann wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Roland Häder wrote: > >> Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a >> specific sender? Starting to become anoying what this one (you know who) >> writes. To much BS for me. > > I guess the

Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?

2019-10-17 Thread RMS Support
>>Can you ask them? I am asking them. > > Yes, put m...@fsfe.org on CC. He is the FSFE president. I say, let us not ask any more but just say the truth. Indeed this is far beyond FSFE. We have to question everything. Your revelations made clear that Debian is a assassination community lead by

RE: Some facts

2019-10-17 Thread RMS Support
> You don't even tell us how FSFE supported you. You praise them for helping > out that there is another organization for free software, but you don't even > tell us a name. I think they really destroyed Dusseldorf and you just want to > protect FSFE. But not as long Daniel and me still live!

Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?

2019-10-17 Thread RMS Support
Oct 17, 2019, 19:57 by dan...@pocock.pro: The second document also appears to contain two resignation emails. I've heard that there have actually been more resignations than that. That is a interesting thought and I think there will be minimum 10 more who will resign within the next weeks. I

Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?

2019-10-17 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 17/10/2019 21:04, Roland Häder wrote: > Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a > specific sender? Starting to become anoying what this one (you know who) > writes. To much BS for me. > Great question "you know who" is somewhat ambiguous, everybody has a

Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?

2019-10-17 Thread Jean Louis
* Daniel Pocock [2019-10-18 01:28]: > The second document also appears to contain two resignation emails. > I've heard that there have actually been more resignations than > that. So you also say that those could be real. I have published few pages:

Re: Can I block this sender? Was: Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?

2019-10-17 Thread Roland Häder
On 10/17/2019 10:23 PM, RMS Support wrote: > Oct 17, 2019, 20:04 by rol...@mxchange.org: >> Is there a way where I can setup a personal (non-global) block against a >> specific sender? Starting to become annoying what this one (you know who) >> writes. To much BS for me. > I cannot understand why

Re: FSFE minutes, or a vendetta?

2019-10-17 Thread Jean Louis
* Roland Häder [2019-10-18 02:21]: > I like your statements a lot as I tend to speak the truth over lies out > and I may include horse and rider, means responsible persons in it. > But one thing starts anoying here and that is this constant attacks on > FSF/E/A (and maybe not limited to them).

on SJWs and feminists

2019-10-17 Thread Daniel Pocock
Hi all, Bradley Kuhn and I both received part of our education in Jesuit institutions. Social justice is an important part of the Jesuit tradition. The label SJW is an insult to social justice and those who pursue it in a meaningful and credible way. The way the feminist label is used is an