- Forwarded message from Bjørn Mork -
From: Bjørn Mork
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:55:27 +0100
To: na...@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Low end, cool CPE.
Organization: m
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
Leo Bicknell writes:
> - IPv6 support, native or tunnel to
- Forwarded message from Charles N Wyble -
From: Charles N Wyble
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:07:14 -0800
To: na...@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Low end, cool CPE.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101006 Thunderbird/3.1.5
On 11/12/2010 01:24 AM,
I have a customer who wants to be able to automate IP blackholing on their
PFSense firewall from their custom IDS. In essence, the application wants to
go something like
'I'm being abused by this IP 198.51.100.20'
'POST HTTPS://GATEWAY/pfapi.php?alias=blocklist&ip=198.51.100.20&comment='
'POST
On 11/12/2010 2:01 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
> I have a customer who wants to be able to automate IP blackholing on their
> PFSense firewall from their custom IDS. In essence, the application wants to
> go something like
>
> 'I'm being abused by this IP 198.51.100.20'
> 'POST HTTPS://GATEWAY
> I'm running the current stable pfSense (1.2.3 I think). Very happy with it.
> It's a
> fully featured distribution that is incredibly well put together.
But still - no IPv6 support (though a 3rd-party patch is now available to beat
it in, it's not up to par yet, and it's not in 'stable'). :(
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
wrote:
[snip]
> But still - no IPv6 support (though a 3rd-party patch is now available to
> beat it in, it's not up to par yet, and it's not in 'stable'). :(
The work Seth is doing will be in 2.1 sometime next year. He has made
a lot of progres
> The work Seth is doing will be in 2.1 sometime next year. He has made a lot
> of progress in a very short amount of time.
And please don't misunderstand - I am absolutely thrilled about it. But it
probably does not meet the OP's needs quite yet.
Nathan
-
