Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:40:50AM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
>> Aargh -- you might have found the real culprit there.
>> Unfortunately, meanwhile I figured out that the error
>> message was due to a corrupt /etc/rc.upgrade (read error,
>> I presume the flash is fried). I've
Harald Jenny wrote:
> first I wanted to say thank you for this nice piece of software, I think it
> can keep up with most commercial appliances, the only thing that makes me a
> little bit sad is the IPSEC support. Not really being a great BSD-crack it
> seems to me that the FreeBSD port of isak
On 2/26/2010 10:26 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> There's no way to get snort to run on an ALIX, am I correct?
It should work but you must be _very_ frugal in choosing the (few) rule
sets you want to load. Also setting it to lowmem is a must.
Jim
---
On 3/8/2010 3:25 PM, Christoph Hanle wrote:
> On 07.03.2010 18:23 Eugen Leitl wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have the 1 GByte 1.2.3 image modified for WRAP
>> around? Thanks.
>>
> Hi Eugen,
> please be carefull with production usage of pfSense 1.2.3 on WRAP,
> I have more troubles with this combiniation
On 3/8/2010 5:51 PM, David Rees wrote:
> I've seen same or similar behavior on an ALIX box with a fairly large
> ruleset and decent number of VPNs.
>
> We could never get all the VPNs to come up properly and we eventually
> ended up with a corrupted configuration file while we were trying to
> dis
On 11/12/2010 2:01 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
> I have a customer who wants to be able to automate IP blackholing on their
> PFSense firewall from their custom IDS. In essence, the application wants to
> go something like
>
> 'I'm being abused by this IP 198.51.100.20'
> 'POST HTTPS://GATEWAY
On 1/2/2011 5:00 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> I'm screwed up after yesterday's update. The firewall
> stopped routing after yesterday's upgrade
> to 2.0-BETA5 built on Sat Jan 1 17:53:01 EST 2011
>
> The firewall seems to see everthing
> (with the exception of package updates:
> "Unable to communi
On 1/2/2011 10:09 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:06:54AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
>
>> Actually it looks like the packages aren't loading on pfSense.com, which
>> would cause that error. It probably isn't related to the snapshots
>> except
On 1/2/2011 10:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:36:42AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
>
>> If there is, it's probably related to the packages you had installed...
>
> I agree it's probably the packages. I've noticed it before, so
> usually
On 1/2/2011 12:35 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:44:07AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
>
>> The packages should be OK again now.
>
> See the packages, upgrade of the other systems (from a
> snapshot of 15 days ago) was uneventful (I purged whatever
> few
On 2/14/2011 4:35 PM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I've read that we cannot install packages on pfsense when using
> it on a compact flash (like for alix systems).
> Will it be still true for 2.0? For now, I've found a opened bug about it
> [1]...
> If it's impossible, may I have a
On 2/25/2011 2:37 PM, Tony Zakula wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am taking the plunge and switching to pfsense. First time loading
> it, so please bear with me.
>
> I have two external interfaces in different ip ranges and subnet
> masks. 3 Nics in the machine altogether. So I will be using 1:1 Nat
> for
On 6/5/2011 7:10 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> So here is my patch, which also contains a few changes required in squid-3.
There's your problem, squid 3 is largely untested and should not be
trusted. :-) If you want it to work, use the squid 2.x package.
Every so often someone else comes alon
On 6/6/2011 5:43 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 18:04, Jim Pingle http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,32923.msg191044.html
[snip]
> So in essence, we need:
>
> (12:25:03 <~>) 0 $ diff squid.inc squid.inc.local
> 527c527
> < }
> --
On 6/8/2011 1:50 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> I have decided that my pfSense PC will have two disks - ad4 and ad6 as
> they are now.
> I'd like to backup ad4 to ad6 every weekend - automated using dump.
>
> Is this the stupid way of doing it?
>
> I have a feeling that someone would tell me th
On 6/8/2011 2:04 PM, Bao Ha wrote:
> How is ataraid ("fake" raid) compared to gmirror?
>
> I think the main disadvantage of ataraid is that it is tied to a
> specific chipset. It is difficult to recover the disk if moved to a
> different systemboard. But, for redundant purposes of a firewall, you
On 6/8/2011 2:32 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> The main issue with using RAID instead of backups is that it doesn’t
> protect against corruption, software bugs, or human error. While there
> are some cases were restoring to last weekend’s known-good state isnt’
> adequate or appropriate, those are fe
17 matches
Mail list logo
