http://trace.wisc.edu/docs/fcc98-146/
The most important issues today:
1. Alternate (non-hearing based) signalling of incoming Skype/Asterisk
calls.
2. Upstream bandwidth, quality and delay limits of video transmission
via the Internet.
--- Omer
--
My Comm
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Omer Zak wrote:
http://trace.wisc.edu/docs/fcc98-146/
The most important issues today:
1. Alternate (non-hearing based) signalling of incoming Skype/Asterisk
calls.
Huh? Skype has a visual notice of incoming calls. Furthermore, why would a
hard-of-hearing person use Skype
Hello Alon,
Thanks for your questions. They are important for a future FAQ
document.
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 10:13 +0200, Alon Altman wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Omer Zak wrote:
>
> > http://trace.wisc.edu/docs/fcc98-146/
> > The most important issues today:
> > 1. Alternate (non-hearing based) s
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005, Omer Zak wrote about "Re: Broadband (fast) Internet
related accessibility issues":
> Alternate is not only visual signaller but also vibrator. If VoiP
> software does not already export an interface usable for activating a
> vibrator or a lamp (via parallel port, serial port
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 11:22 +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2005, Omer Zak wrote about "Re: Broadband (fast) Internet
> related accessibility issues":
> > Alternate is not only visual signaller but also vibrator. If VoiP
> > software does not already export an interface usable for ac
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005, Omer Zak wrote about "Re: Broadband (fast) Internet
related accessibility issues":
> > If you're interested, I can show you a tiny piece of code I wrote that
> > captures these beeps, and does something else (in my case, I wanted to
> > flash the screen, and play a fancy beep
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Omer Zak wrote:
Why not use
text-based communication that is accessible to both the deaf and the blind?
Accessibility technology must be tailored to the needs of the person/s
using it. Some people cannot use text based communication (due to
illiteracy and/or dyslexia) so t
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Alon Altman wrote:
> If I understand correctly, the video accessibility problem may be
> relevant to deaf (or hard of hearing) people who are also
> illterate or dyslexic, but sill have access to modern computing
> equipment and a high-speed connection.
Or people who are mo
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 12:24 +0200, Alon Altman wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Omer Zak wrote:
> >> Why not use
> >> text-based communication that is accessible to both the deaf and the blind?
> >
> > Accessibility technology must be tailored to the needs of the person/s
> > using it. Some people ca
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 08:43, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> Tal Kaplan wrote:
> > שלום לכולם,
> >
> >
> >
> > בהתאם להוראות התקנון והחוק ובהמשך לפנייתה של אורנה,
> >
> >
> >
> > אני סבור כי במועד האסיפה הכללית הקרובה צריכה העמותה לקיים הצבעה ולבחור
> > חבר ועד *_אחד_* שיחליף את אורנה, וזאת עד לק
On Sunday 04 December 2005 17:24, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On 4 Dec, 2005, at 12:06, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 December 2005 01:31, Nir Soffer wrote:
> >> On 4 Dec, 2005, at 0:10, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> >>> I think we should stick we http://www.linux.org.il/ clean design...
> >>> http://welcome.
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:22:25 +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
>
> In my opinion, not every application should deal on its own with "alerting"
> the user, because a standard solution already exists: The X Windows beep.
> Not only does it not require modifying every little application, and it is
> completel
12 matches
Mail list logo
