On 12 Aug 2002, Marcus Gruendler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have uncommented the line in config.h and recompiled distcc but I still
cannot compile my project with ccache :-(. The error message is a bit
different now (second last line):
distcc[20282] (dcc_try_lock_host)
On 14 Aug 2002, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while ago, we've been talking about using distcc to speed up gcc
bootstraps. I've made some progress today towards this goal, but
there's still some way to go to get there.
Great!
- the bootstrap check fails, even though I have
On 22 Jul 2002, Stephen White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The attached patch (against version 0.6) seems to have fixed the
problem.
Thanks! It'll be in the next release.
Thanks for a great program!
+++ distcc-0.6/src/filename.c Mon Jul 22 15:05:19 2002
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
} else if
On 14 Aug 2002, Chris Halls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- in dcc_preproc_exten, the extension '.ii' is not recognised. Ccache
preprocesses source and passes input files to distcc with this
extension.
- in dcc_accept_job, the function dcc_preproc_exten can return NULL,
and this is
Pool)
* --help for distcc explains more about host specifications. (Martin
Pool)
BUG FIXES:
* Correctly handle compilation of C++ code under ccache, by properly
recognizing the .ii extension. (Stephen White, Chris Halls)
* Boolean environment variables (e.g
By the way, I'll be on vacation and not reading email for the next
week. Talk amongst yourselves.
--
Martin
___
distcc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
On 30 Aug 2002, Hien D. Ngo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running a continuous compile (with a distcc version with both
HAVE_SENDFILE and HAVE_SYS_SENDFILE_H commented out) and things seem
to be working.
If that doesn't fix it, the other thing that might help would be to
try commenting out
This has a lot of fairly small bug fixes to try to address the
problems reported last week.
--
Martin
___
distcc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
On 4 Sep 2002, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 3, 2002, Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has a lot of fairly small bug fixes to try to address the
problems reported last week.
I was sure I was going to find this patch in 0.9, but as far as I can
tell
On 4 Sep 2002, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 4, 2002, Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see how the gcc 3.1 manual does explain this behaviour (-S =
stop after compilation), but it's a bit subtle. Do you know if that
behaviour is the same in other compilers
On 4 Sep 2002, Hien D. Ngo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
I found the snippet of the distcc log for a FIN_WAIT1 connection. The child process
that is spawned exits so it tries to compile locally. Both the remote and local
compiles exit with the same
On 4 Sep 2002, Hien D. Ngo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
distcc continues to run on my RH 6 test boxes, but now leaves a ton of FIN_WAIT1
processes around (284 total at last count.) My RH 7.2/7.3 boxes don't exhibit this
problem and are still running
On 7 Sep 2002, Nick Moffitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[external parallelization]
(or, as my old professor called it, paralysation.)
It's a tough problem, and one that I'd like to see solved
portably. Some individual packages, for example, are not internally
parallelizable, and the
On 12 Sep 2002, Dimitri PAPADOPOULOS-ORFANOS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Trying to build on Solaris 8 with the Sun ONE Studio 7 compiler:
cc -O -I/usr/local/popt/include -c -o implicit.o implicit.c
distcc.h, line 63: syntax error before or at: pid_t
distcc.h, line 63: warning:
On 18 Sep 2002, Gerhard Kutzelnigg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One other thing I was thinking about was to do something with the
distribution mechanism in distcc.
I've updated the FAQ discussing a central controller:
http://distcc.samba.org/faq.html#central-controller
I realize it might
On 18 Sep 2002, Gerhard Kutzelnigg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Martin,
oops, one error was me. ;-) The W_EXITCODE is actually correctly handled. I
was using distcc-0.9 just two days ago and then fixed the bug in 0.10.1 as
well without testing if it was already fixed... ;-)
Sorry to
On 16 Sep 2002, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 16, 2002, Dimitri PAPADOPOULOS-ORFANOS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then there would still be the option of letting distcc run the
compiler the name of which is given by the symlink. This way
you don't have to modify Makefiles
The manual from Debian Sid's gcc-3.2 (3.2.1-0pre3) says
If `-MD' is used in conjunction with `-E', any `-o' switch is
understood to specify the dependency output file (but *note
-MF::), but if used without `-E', each `-o' is understood to
specify a target object file.
But
On 7 Oct 2002, Ernesto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I just installed distcc on a couple of PCs. One Pentium 3 600 and a dual Pentium III
866.
Now, I want the dual P3 to accept more jobs than the single P3. I've
read the docs and it says there's no way to do this yet and I was
On 10 Oct 2002, Kai Reichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !
distcc works for most packages.
Now I tried to compile glibc (under gentoo).
It stops after a while of compiling with following error message :
Any ideas what' wrong ?
It looks like you found a bug. Congratulations! :-)
On 12 Oct 2002, George D. Plymale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a mixed network environment. MacOS X, Linux, and Windows (with
cygwin). Seeing distcc really piqued my interest. Using gcc on all of my
environments, can I set up distcc to span across this variety of operating
systems?
On 15 Oct 2002, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 15, 2002, Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ for s in src; do cd $$s; $(MAKE) all || exit $$? ; done
It is far better to say
cd $$s $(MAKE) all
Even better to say:
do (cd $$s $(MAKE) all
This mailing list is now also available as an NNTP newsgroup, courtesy
of the people at GMANE.org.
news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.distcc
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.comp.compilers.distcc
There is a two-way link: (non-spam) posts to the newsgroup ought to
end up
if you do it as you go along.
If you leave it for three months, it looks very intimidating.
-- Martin Pool
___
distcc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
On 16 Oct 2002, Steve Litster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've built distcc using the mpicc/mpiCC compilers from mpich_1.2.4..8a
under RedHat Linux 7.3
How does mpicc work? Is it a whole new compiler, or a wrapper around
gcc? If it's a wrapper, what does it do?
When I use distcc in
On the face of it, it almost looks like a network problem, as the
client thinks it has sent all the data and the server has not received
it. Is there anything unusual about the network, e.g. a firewall
somewhere?
Can you provide the lines from the output of netstat relating to
port 4200 on both
On 22 Oct 2002, Brad Hards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmake -j4 CC=distcc tcc
Can you try -j8 as well? You basically have 4 CPUs, and the sweet spot is
claimed to be twice the CPUs available.
Yes, I think it would be good
On 25 Oct 2002, Corrado Giacomini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I arranged to figure out how big is the argument list I am passing
to the execvp system call and I have found that is 4834 bytes in
size.
Wow, that's a very low limit.
My question are:
How I can figure out which of the above
On 17 Oct 2002, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've made available a distcc-current as of nov-17 with my alternative
popt library, binaries say 0.13. What has been done is minor stuff
really:
* Edited out popt from Makefile.in and the configure script
* Added my very basic popt replacement;
- Forwarded message from Stephen P. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Stephen P. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problems with distcc cross-compilation: Sharp Zaurus - Linux...
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 18:12:57 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stephen Wilson [EMAIL
On 6 Nov 2002, Michael Santy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to compile on solaris 8 and 9, but is having trouble on IRIX. The
linker is complaining about the absence of wait4 (which is used in
exec.c). I have been grepping around in /usr/include and /usr/lib32 and
it does not appear that
On 7 Nov 2002, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not quite, i investigated this issue further, and while this fixes the
path names to the original input file, it doesn't fix up relative
includes like #include ../gdk/gdk.h.
I thought that might be the case.
interestingly, these are not
On 8 Nov 2002, Shane McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the following crontab entry on a machine
0 * * * * /home/shanem/bin/distccd
basically if the machine is ever rebooted or the process dies for some
reason I'd like it to come up automatically, and since distccd checks for
a
On 11 Nov 2002, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the only real solution i can come up with at this point, is
to ensure that all pathnames which end up in the object file
are absolute. this gets us around `basename $inputfile` relative
file names, and around gcc-cwd relative file
--no-detach option to cause the server not to detach from its
parent. It still forks normally when a connection is accepted. This
may be useful with daemontools or other frameworks that prefer the
daemon not to detach. (Martin Pool)
* Log messages on the server of severity
On 12 Nov 2002, Shane McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The crontab is under my regular userid, and --daemon does not help
There are no /var/adm/messages entries generated when the distccd process
starts up from cron.
However the log contains entries when it fails on a distributed job.
On 12 Nov 2002, Frerich Raabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moin moin,
is it me or does the distcc-0.13.tar.gz tarball lack most of the HTML
documentation files it used to ship in previous versions? AFAICS there's
only the index page 'distcc.html', but 'distcc-1.html' co. are missing
here.
On 12 Nov 2002, Dimitri Papadopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Building distcc-0.13 on Red Hat Linux 7.3 I get the following
warnings:
src/exec.c: In function `dcc_inside_child':
src/exec.c:193: warning: unused parameter `what'
src/serve.c:149: warning: `dcc_kill_compiler' defined
On 13 Nov 2002, Oscar Esteban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TESTING:
* Add test for handling of a compiler missing from the server. (Martin Pool)
This does not work as is, because perror@glibc can be localized.
So, I get the message 'distccd[4900] (dcc_execvp) ERROR: failed
On 13 Nov 2002, Bob Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.93 on a linux box.
Doing a make -j1 (which sets CC=distcc) everything works fine.
Doing a make -j2 the compile bombs out.
If I set CC=gcc, -j2 (I have a dual processor box) the compile completes.
I don't
On 14 Nov 2002, Bob Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 11:45 pm, you wrote:
export DISTCC_VERBOSE=1 DISTCC_LOG=/tmp/distcc.log
Run the compile up until it fails, and post the (relevant sections of)
the log. Also, please explain in more detail what you mean by
On 14 Nov 2002, Ajay Agrawalla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also discovered the 4 host scenerio yesterday and had sent an email to
this list. I checked out the latest code and looks like Martin has
updated the code to get around this problem.
Get the latest code and it should
On 14 Nov 2002, Brad Hards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob: What version of distcc are you running? Does the problem still occur with
0.1.3?
By the way, this is zero point thirteen, not zero point one point
three. The de facto standard these days is to interpret version
numbers as a
On 15 Nov 2002, Ben Elliston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott == Scott Lystig Fritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scott % setenv DISTCC_HOSTS proxy proxy proxy proxy proxy proxy proxy proxy
proxy proxy proxy proxy proxy proxy proxy proxy proxy
Scott % make -j17 blahblah
Hmm -- I
On 15 Nov 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 15.11.02 16:48:12:
Hi,
gcc -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt
-I./src -c -o src/clinet.o src/clinet.c
In file included from src/clinet.c:43:
/usr/include/sys/socket.h:484:
On 15 Nov 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
From: ext Martin Pool [mailto:mbp;samba.org]
Sent: Dienstag, 12. November 2002 08:54
distcc-0.13 Armistice 2002-11-11
the compilation fails on HP-UX 11.11, which hasn't surprised
me since we often have problems compiling open source
jobs.
(Martin Pool)
* Fix Makefile bug that caused HTML documentation to be missing from the
distribution tarball. (Frerich Raabe, Martin Pool)
* Make PreprocessPlainText_Case run in appropriate subdirectory. (Martin
Pool)
PORTABILITY:
* Test for wait4 and wait3
On 17 Nov 2002, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I normally compile on the workstation but sometimes when I'm in a hurry
and need a big tree rebuilt I want to tap the power of the multi processor
box using distcc.
What I tried:
just specify DISTCC_HOSTS=mpbox CC=distcc gcc make -j8
On 18 Nov 2002, Michael Santy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also a problem with make install on solaris 8 and 9 (It
builds like a champ). Solaris (at least the machines that I'm working
on) are missing a BSD style install executable. It appears that you
are delivering install-sh,
On 18 Nov 2002, Michael Santy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correctly compiles and installs (using install-sh) under solaris 9.
However, it dies on installing documentation due to the absence of
linuxdoc on solaris. I guess you need to check for this in configure
as well.
For now, please just
On 18 Nov 2002, Michael Santy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like some good work has been put into this. However, I'm still
having a problem compiling on irix. The change to compile is below.
Line 281 of exec.c should be changed from:
return waitpid(pid, status);
to:
return
On 19 Nov 2002, Jonas Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch is a solution to send more than one job at each
CPU. But the solution should go beyond that. I think that the
dispatch should be completely dynamic. I see our dev environment
being composed of dev machines for developpers
On 19 Nov 2002, Dimitri Papadopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please find attached a patch against configure.ac from distcc-0.14.
It follows the header dependencies documented here:
http://www.sas.com/service/library/onlinedoc/sasc/doc700/html/lr2/zr2bsdhf.htm
as well as the autoconf.info
On 19 Nov 2002, Jean-Eric Cuendet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
A while ago, there was a discussion (
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/distcc/2002q4/000386.html
) to support -MD on gcc.
-MD works with some versions of gcc. The fix to make it work with
versions of gcc with variant behaviour
Onlooker 20 Nov 2002, Dwayne Rightler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a small patch I wrote so you can start distccd with
user/group.
Thankyou for the patch.
I think as written this is not secure, because on some platforms it
will leave the process with some root privileges. I might be
On 20 Nov 2002, Dwayne Rightler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a small patch I wrote so you can start distccd with
user/group.
Also: why add that code to distcc when there seem to be perfectly good
external methods such as su to change uid before running it?
--
Martin
IANA have assigned an official TCP port for distcc, 3632. (Yay
distcc! :-)
A future release of distcc will switch to 3632 as the default port for
client and server. This means that if you use an old client and new
server or vice versa, they will not be able to find each other. Since
distcc is
On 3 Dec 2002, Heiko Elger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
with the current release 0.14 and cygwin 1.3.17-1 I get the follwing error:
My OS is Windows XP Pro SP1.
$ make CC=distcc gcc -j5
distcc gcc -g -O0 -c -o modul1.o modul1.c
distcc[324] (dcc_lock_host) ERROR: lock
On 9 Dec 2002, Dimitri Papadopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to insist on the subject, I know it has been widely discussed:
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/distcc/2002q3/000213.html
However this looks like a good (new) reason to enable implicit compiler
names in distcc, at least
Everybody,
If you have a few minutes, please look through the distcc manual with
an eye on readability for a new user. I've recently edited to try to
make some parts clearer but I'm sure there is room for improvement.
Please send your constructive criticisms to me or to the list.
On 12 Dec 2002, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 12, 2002, Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Add $(TARGET_ROOT) variable for make install, for use in building
binary packages. (Martin Pool, Nick Moffitt)
FWIW, this variable has been conventionally named
On 12 Dec 2002, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 12, 2002, Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've since been informed that it's better to use a different name for
gcc, because -V doesn't work completely reliably. I'm not sure of the
exact reason.
The reason
On 12 Dec 2002, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe so. GCC 3.3 is going to install itself as
target-gcc-version, in addition to target-gcc and, if it's
native, gcc-version and gcc.
OK, I'll update the manual to reflect that.
--
Martin
On 13 Dec 2002, Scott Lystig Fritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ended up writing a smarter proxy, mostly because I wanted the proxy
to be able to choose the fastest backend machine that is currently
idle. I did it on company time, and I did it in Erlang, but if those
things don't dissuade
On 12 Dec 2002, Cristian Tibirna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I was thinking of some sort of round-robin on a port-forwarding firewall
rule, but:
1) I'm not sure this is possible with the iptables of today :-)
2) More than just round-robin is needed.
Keep it simple:
First, just forward
On 13 Dec 2002, Stephen White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My company does a fair amount of work in C++, preprocessed C++ source
files can be quite large and bits of our internal network are not
terribly fast .. so I thought I'd look at implementing the LZO
compression @todo in the source code.
On 18 Dec 2002, Chris Halls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 10:14:57AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
The problem then is that you may have files or processes hanging
around with no name for their uid, which is confusing.
It is probably brief-lived enough not to worry too much
I already replied:
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/distcc/2002q4/000530.html
--
Martin
___
distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/
To unsubscribe or change options:
http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
Alan Cox,
distcc 1.0 has just been released. I think the project is now at a
level of stability to deserve the 1.x tag.
The changes to the program itself from 0.15 are intentionally quite
small, so as to increase the chance of a stable 1.0 release. The only
bug fix is for a problem with sendfile on BSD
On 18 Jan 2003, Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have compiled the 1.0 release of distcc on my slack box and got an
error about the multiline printf in dopt.c (line 113-114) (using gcc 3.2.)
gcc -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -I./src -c
I would guess that perhaps you have another program called 'cc' on
your path, or that there is some kind of conflict between the versions
of gcc installed on this machine. Investigating 'gcc -v' might find
out what's wrong.
On 18 Jan 2003, Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the
On 18 Jan 2003, Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As unlikely as it sounds, it is what it is. I quoted the last messages
because they were the ones for the file before the scheduler. grepping
the output of the file showed nothing for sched.
If I can figure out what's wrong, I'll see if
On 21 Jan 2003, Kevin N. Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just started using Distcc in my Gentoo Cluster. Wonderful tool - it has
reduced my compile times in half.
Great. Thanks for writing.
I am getting a complaint titled dcc_pump_sendfile refering my use of
tmpfs. Did a quick scan
On 25 Jan 2003, Brad Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunetly, few emerges run to completion before they die. This
occurs when I change my /etc/make.conf to use MAKEOPTS=-j10 CC=distcc,
or play games like putting a wrapper script in /bin called gcc... (which
I believe would be a
(The release name, incidentally, is not rude. It refers to the metal
balls on the governor of a steam engine moving out under centrifugal
force at high speed. :-)
http://www.cs.hmc.edu/claremont/keller/152-slides/495.html
distcc-1.1 balls to the wall 2003-01-28
BUGS:
* Flag
On 27 Jan 2003, Bob Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you point me to where I can read more about the benchmark capabilities in
distcc?
The 1.1 release talks about it, but I can't seem to find any more info on it.
It's not really documented yet, aside from the source.
Basically:
cd
Because of the enormous amount of traffic being generated by Windows
viruses[0] I have turned on Mailman attachment filtering on the
high-traffic samba.org lists.
Lists will now pass only text/plain MIME parts through to the list.
multipart/alternative messages with both text and html forms will
On 5 Feb 2003, Brad Hards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on an ethereal dissector for distcc, and it is starting to come
together.
Why? Just for completeness in ethereal, or something else? Not that
I mind.
However I have some queries. I might have some of it wrong too. Any
On 6 Feb 2003, Giles, Lezz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I normally compile a file it stores the pathname given to the compiler
and the current working directory - then if I'm debugging using gdb in
another directory, gdb is clever enough to combine these two to find the
source file. The
On 7 Feb 2003, Pupeno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
How well does distcc manage computers turning on and off ?
May it loose data if a computer IN the farm shuts down ?
No, it should not. If you abruptly shut down, then that compiler
command will fail, which may cause your
On 5 Feb 2003, Paul Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've solved this and uploaded. Packaged 1.1, too for immenent uploading
after some testing.
Thanks!
-pkgdoc_DOCS = AUTHORS COPYING COPYING.FDL NEWS OLDNEWS README \
+pkgdoc_DOCS = AUTHORS NEWS OLDNEWS README \
DEPENDENCIES
- Forwarded message from Peter Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Hawkins)
Subject: Bug#181152: distcc host selection algorithm is too naive
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:09:17 +1100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9
On 17 Feb 2003, Martin Pool mbp wrote:
The algorithm distcc uses to perform selection of which host a job
should be built on is too naive.
OK. It seems to work for me (spreading load reasonably), but I have
only personally tested up to three machines.
The relevant code in src/where.c tends
On 17 Feb 2003, Peter Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, as you correctly observed, the locking isn't done correctly -
because the lock name does not include the port number. Hence all of the
hosts in the list compete for the same set of locks (and the first
machine wins in almost
On 17 Feb 2003, Stuart D. Gathman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked and looked, but couldn't find the public key to verify the
signature of the distcc download. The Samba.org public key doesn't
match. I also looked on sourcefrog.net to no avail. Where do I get the
public key?
It should
On 20 Feb 2003, Laurence Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I was installing LFS a few weeks ago, I thought I'd use distcc to speed
things up a bit, by using some other computers too. However they are running
windows, so I created a bootdisk that loads a root image of distcc off the
On 20 Feb 2003, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.gtk.org/~timj/patches/distcc-line3.diff
Thanks Tim,
I did want to ask why you didn't just use stdio rather than apparently
recreating the buffering functions.
--
Martin
__
distcc mailing list
On 21 Feb 2003, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mostly because the skeleton for the parsing got copied over
from another project (so i didn't have to write it from scratch),
and that wouldn't use stdio because of some of stdios limitations
OK, sounds reasonable to me. I thought that was
On 25 Feb 2003, Julien Letessier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So should the manual say that CPPFLAGS should always have
-no-cpp-precomp on Darwin?
Definitely. If you don't your make will stop immediately with:
gcc -I./lib -I./popt -I./src -g -O2 -W -Wall -W -Wimplicit -Wshadow
On 25 Feb 2003, Bret Mogilefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They've open-sourced a zeroconf mDNS implementation under the APSL (which
I believe is now compatible with the GPL).
According to the most recent FSF statement I can find, it is not
compatible. You therefore cannot distribute a work
Hi, Sorry for not replying before.
On 18 Feb 2003, Stuart D. Gathman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I am new to distcc. I have been using my own version of distributed
gcc for 15 years. It works by replacing cc1 and cc1plus with a stub that
runs those programs on a remote system. The
On 18 Feb 2003, Stuart D. Gathman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My old cc1.c code support the -pipe option to gcc. This results in ccp
feeding directly to cc1 over the network (without a temporary file) and the
output of cc1 feeding directly to 'as'.
OK, the big difference is that you intercept
On 25 Feb 2003, Bret Mogilefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You caught me out, it's a hypothetical one. =) Here's my motivation: I
manage PlayStation2 developer support.
T-shirts from happy users are always welcome, you know. ;-)
The compiler for the PS2 is gcc, and various game developers
On 25 Feb 2003, Bret Mogilefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I audited this license while Apple was working on the draft. It's a good
license. The only way in which it is GPL-incompatible is that it requires
that you disclose some source code when the GPL would not. GPL only
requires source code
On 25 Feb 2003, Stuart D. Gathman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc emits whatever asm syntax is in the MD file. For AIX, the MD file
has IBM syntax. There are other platforms with entrenched native
assembler/object formats where gcc also defaults to the native
assembler.
OK, thanks for
On 26 Feb 2003, Tom Matelich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas?
http://distcc.samba.org/manual/html/distcc-1.html#ss1.5
--
Martin
__
distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/
To unsubscribe or change options:
http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
On 26 Feb 2003, Tom Matelich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#elif defined(__hpux)
static ssize_t sys_sendfile(int ofd, int ifd, off_t *offset, size_t size)
{
return sendfile(ofd, ifd, *offset, size, NULL, 0);
}
Thanks for that.
I have two boxes on my farm. The remote box is listed as the
2003/01/27 11:33:51 mbp Exp $
*
* Copyright (C) 2002, 2003 by Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
@@ -108,6 +107,24 @@ static ssize_t sys_sendfile(int ofd, int
{
return sendfile(ofd, ifd, offset, size);
}
+#elif defined(__hpux) || defined(__hpux__)
+/* HP cc in ANSI mode defines __hpux
On 26 Feb 2003, Tom Matelich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I'm new to distcc. What is the masquerade patch?
It allows distcc to intercept all calls to 'cc' or 'c++'. Have a look
in the mail archives for more info.
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/distcc/
--
Martin
__
distcc mailing
ccache 2.2 and distcc 1.2.2 seem to fix the problem of false misses
when these programs are used together. When I build samba's 3_0
branch with CC='ccache distcc gcc-3.2' then almost every file gets a
cache hit.
--
Martin
__
distcc mailing listhttp://distcc.samba.org/
To
1 - 100 of 708 matches
Mail list logo
