On 19 August 2016 at 15:32, wrote:
> From: Distutils-SIG [mailto:distutils-sig-bounces+tritium-
>> Alternatively, we could simply not worry about a user level flag, and
>> just have a project level flag that's set to "No legacy formats" by
>> default for new projects - new users won't have any in
> -Original Message-
> From: Distutils-SIG [mailto:distutils-sig-bounces+tritium-
> list=sdamon@python.org] On Behalf Of Nick Coghlan
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 9:40 PM
> To: Nathaniel Smith
> Cc: DistUtils mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Distutils] Deprecating little used file
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Daniel Holth wrote:
>
>> And a while back I argued against setuptools-lite, because I thought it
>> would not solve the poor extensibility problem that stems from its basic
>> distutils derived design... whic
Re: buildout and pip and wheel
"Add support for installing wheels"
https://github.com/buildout/buildout/issues/144
It's been awhile since I've worked with buildout (for Zope 2, Plone,
AppEngine zipimports).
This reads #egg= links from pip requirements files:
-
https://github.com/collective/coll
On 19 August 2016 at 08:12, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> * new project by existing maintainer: here, I'd be inclined to flag
>> maintainer accounts at the start of the deprecation period based on whether
>> or not they're currently using the le
On 19 August 2016 at 07:58, Donald Stufft wrote:
>> On Aug 18, 2016, at 5:53 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> I'm very sure I don't understand something, because I thought wheels were
>> just
>> fine for the import-from-sys.path use case. I mean, pip does this and in
>> Debian, we have a program (dir
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> * new project by existing maintainer: here, I'd be inclined to flag
> maintainer accounts at the start of the deprecation period based on whether
> or not they're currently using the legacy formats on any of their projects -
> that is, the mi
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 17 August 2016 at 01:15, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
> wrote:
>> PS: In the buildout community, we never really understood the impetus for
>> replacing egg as a format, which is really not all that complex and not all
>> the different from w
On Aug 17, 2016, at 03:21 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>This means that the situation we've managed to get to now is that we
>have wheels as a satisfactory replacement for the "binary
>distribution" use case, but we haven't even *tried* to replace eggs
>for the "standalone path entry" use case.
I'm ve
> On Aug 18, 2016, at 5:53 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 03:21 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> This means that the situation we've managed to get to now is that we
>> have wheels as a satisfactory replacement for the "binary
>> distribution" use case, but we haven't even *tried*
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Daniel Holth wrote:
> And a while back I argued against setuptools-lite, because I thought it
> would not solve the poor extensibility problem that stems from its basic
> distutils derived design... which includes all the classes and subclasses
> that have to work
11 matches
Mail list logo
