On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 07:15 +0200, Julian 'Julik' Tarkhanov wrote:
>
> On 17-aug-2006, at 1:08, Bill de hÓra wrote:
>
> > like wanting to serve utf8 rss feeds, but have latin1 come
> > in and out of mysql.
>
> Might seem very extreme, but I would love to chime in. Maybe it would
> be wise to
On 17-aug-2006, at 1:08, Bill de hÓra wrote:
> like wanting to serve utf8 rss feeds, but have latin1 come
> in and out of mysql.
Might seem very extreme, but I would love to chime in. Maybe it would
be wise to go even further, whereby:
1. Hardcode Django to output and input UTF-8 as the most
When I try to make some big changes on the wiki they get rejected -
Akismet rejects them as spam :/ I wanted to make a ticked about it -
rejected also.
Here: http://www.wklej.org/id/e7bb1758b9 is the edited main wiki page
(more links, better organization etc.)
--~--~-~--~~--
On 8/19/06, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm well aware that its no problem to use ajax right now by using any
> JS toolkit. My point was that it seems somewhat wasteful to have custom
> JS scripts for the admin generator, and then using a JS toolkit that
> does the same thing.
I submitt
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 07:57 +, simonbun wrote:
> > I'm not so sure its such a bad idea to bundle a JS toolkit with the
> > framework.
>
> It's only been a month since the last time we had this thread. Do we
> have to do this again? :-(
>
> Really, you bring up noth
On 8/19/06, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Ajax would be a possibility. I know many of you don't like ajax, but
> i believe that if its used with consideration and restraint (i.e. no
> color-changing div layers flying about), it can be a big plus. This
> does not mean that the admin gener
On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 07:57 +, simonbun wrote:
> I'm not so sure its such a bad idea to bundle a JS toolkit with the
> framework.
It's only been a month since the last time we had this thread. Do we
have to do this again? :-(
Really, you bring up nothing that hasn't been covered in the Lord
SmileyChris wrote:
> On a side note, most people just want access to media_url, so I
> actually would be happy with just
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2532. Every web site wanting to
> use static CSS will need to access this variable somehow, won't they?
No, I asked my two sites and they
I'm not so sure its such a bad idea to bundle a JS toolkit with the
framework.
Last time i checked, there's about 65Kb of custom JS in django already.
>From a first glance this is all functionality that can be found in most
JS toolkits. Right now, if i want to use a toolkit, i have to accept
its
