On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 15:42 -0700, SmileyChris wrote:
> I should really reply here rather than in the ticket:
>
> In that ticket I kinda agree with anonymous (who I'm guessing was
> jedie). That ticket has a patch two months old, and since it's not
> that critical it could sit there for much long
I should really reply here rather than in the ticket:
In that ticket I kinda agree with anonymous (who I'm guessing was
jedie). That ticket has a patch two months old, and since it's not
that critical it could sit there for much longer. Well maybe not in
this case, now it has got some attention.
I haven't been tracking the newforms-admin branch, so this may already
be done, but I think it'd be a good idea to allow querysets (or Q's)
to be used for list_filter.
For example, I'd like to make it easy for an admin to see just the
list of un-geocoded objects, which is where latitude == None (
In the docu there ware two syntax for a "per-view cache":
"""
def my_cool_view(request):
# cool processing
slashdot_this = cache_page(slashdot_this, 60 * 15)
"""
or
"""
@cache_page(60 * 15)
def my_cool_view(request):
# cool processing
"""
see: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/ca
By the way, the project is at
http://code.google.com/p/django-check-constraints
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googl
Hello Django Developers,
A week after changing my approach, I have been able to make some
progress. Also this week, I am posting screencasts to showcase my
work.
This week I tackled both Value based and Range Based constraints.
The things left to do are :
-> Implementing 'like' and 'between' che
2007/6/20, David Larlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2007/6/20, Gábor Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > David Larlet wrote:
> > > 2007/6/18, David Larlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I've just tried to use the permission_required decorator for my views
> > >> and I realise that there
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 16:54 +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
[...]
> Since this really isn't the problem I want to work on right now and
> since it is causing some destabilisation and changes block a bit based
> on somebody with commit access being ready to react, I'll back it out so
> that you c
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:16 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 04:54:27PM +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:29 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> > [...]
> > > While it's not performance related, one additional argument against
> > > iter_render via
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 04:54:27PM +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:29 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> [...]
> > While it's not performance related, one additional argument against
> > iter_render via James Bennett is that it makes third party code
> > supplying their
10 matches
Mail list logo
