On 9/2/07, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any objections to requiring the second form?
I don't have any huge objections, and it makes sense that we'd require
this, given that each command knows what its valid options are.
Adrian
--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | djangoproject.com
-
On 9/2/07, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How would people feel about going to an svn style for help? My specific
> proposal is that 'help' would be added as a possible command.
>
> $ django-admin.py help
>
> would list all possible commands.
>
> $ django-admin.py help command_name
>
>
Isn't having choices (with a value and display text) already combining
presentation with the model? I don't see why having the model ignore
the groupings would be any worse than having the model ignore the
display text for each choice.
I'd really like to see nested choices / optgroups allowed in
On 9/3/07, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How would people feel about going to an svn style for help? My specific
> proposal is that 'help' would be added as a possible command.
+1. When there were only a few commands, a single help page made
sense, but now that there are dozens of c
Guido strongly recommends you try to rely on the 2to3 conversion tool
to generate the Python 3000 version for a while to come, or suffer
having to maintain two code bases. So "porting" should ideally be
fixing the 2to3 tool, or tweaking the Python 2.x version of Django so
that the tool can do its
Hi Julian,
Julian schrieb:
>> Ahem ... where's the patch in the ticket? Perhaps I'm being dumb, but I
>> honestly don't see one.
>>
>
> Okay, sorry, it should have been this link:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/285
>
> but maybe i am totally wrong and better stop writing.
Well, to a
Currently,
$ django-admin.py --help
returns a usage guide for every command available. It's long and lists
all command options at the bottom, even though some are only appropriate
for some commands. Because of this, each command has to list which
options it allows separately and these appear in
Currently, both of the following work:
$ django-admin.py --opt value command_name [1]
$ django-admin.py command_name --opt value [2]
because django-admin.py is the actual command and the command_name is
just an arg.
If we create a parser that only admits options that are valid for the
given co
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 10:55 -0500, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 8/28/07, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's a suggestion to pull the options out of
> > django.core.management.ManagementUtility: What if we just read the
> > command after manage.py/django-admin.py and then passed the
>
> Ahem ... where's the patch in the ticket? Perhaps I'm being dumb, but I
> honestly don't see one.
>
Okay, sorry, it should have been this link:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/285
but maybe i am totally wrong and better stop writing.
julian
> Michael
--~--~-~--~~---
On 8/31/07, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > If there are bits of Django that need to be fixed for Jython support,
> > please file tickets with "jython" in the keywords field; I'll keep an
> > eye on that tag and try to f
Julian schrieb:
> Sorry, i did not want to offend someone, but it was just a lttle bit
> frustrating.
>
> there is a patch wich was postet here:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1516
>
> but it has not been applied to the yet, maybe i will do it manually
> with my own local django-ins
Sorry, i did not want to offend someone, but it was just a lttle bit
frustrating.
there is a patch wich was postet here:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1516
but it has not been applied to the yet, maybe i will do it manually
with my own local django-installation.
kind regards
julian
On
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:04:35AM -0500, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> > but have any of the developers tried running django on Python 3?
>
> Python 3.0a1 (py3k, Aug 31 2007, 13:09:02)
> [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367)] on darwin
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for mo
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Yeah, it's gonna be a long road...
Guido's tool "2to3"[1] should make those boring syntax conversions
automatically and leave only juicy parts to human brains.
[1]: http://svn.python.org/view/sandbox/trunk/2to3/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Y
On 9/1/07, jorjun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I disagree with __slots__ being justified purely for optimization
> purposes.
Disagree all you want, but this is what Guido Van Rossum, creator of
Python and BDFL, had to say about it:
"__slots__ is a terrible hack with nasty, hard-to-fathom sid
On 9/1/07, Griffin Caprio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know it's obscenely early,
Yeah, it really is. Django's going to be Python 2-based for quite some time yet.
> but have any of the developers tried
> running django on Python?
Python 3.0a1 (py3k, Aug 31 2007, 13:09:02)
[GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Co
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 10:42 +, SmileyChris wrote:
> I wrote a patch [1] to fix counting distinct ValueQuerySets. My test
> checks that it works
>
> >>> len(Article.objects.values('pub_date').distinct())
> 5
> >>> Article.objects.values('pub_date').distinct().count()
> 5
>
> The problem is, t
I wrote a patch [1] to fix counting distinct ValueQuerySets. My test
checks that it works
>>> len(Article.objects.values('pub_date').distinct())
5
>>> Article.objects.values('pub_date').distinct().count()
5
The problem is, this unearthed a new bug: PostgreSQL chokes on the
control test ("for SEL
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 02:49 -0700, Julian wrote:
> hi there,
>
> until now i am very happy with django, but something made me spent
> some hours of time with it, i've figured this out:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5320
>
> wich has an underlying issue:
>
> http://code.djangoproject
hi there,
until now i am very happy with django, but something made me spent
some hours of time with it, i've figured this out:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5320
wich has an underlying issue:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1516
wich is obviously not solved yet. it occurrs in a t
21 matches
Mail list logo
