Sounds good.
I'll try to clean up the patch as much as possible when I get some time too.
Right now it's a little rough around the edges.
//D
On 11/1/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 19:17 +0100, Dmitri Fedortchenko wrote:
> > I opened a ticket,
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 19:17 +0100, Dmitri Fedortchenko wrote:
> I opened a ticket, looking forward to your input and ideas.
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5849
Thanks. I'll get to it eventually, but it might take a week or so. I'm
pretty busy right at the moment and have a few other
I opened a ticket, looking forward to your input and ideas.
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5849
On 10/31/07, Dmitri Fedortchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now that I re-read your definition, there is one difference between your
> suggestion and my patch.
> My patch just uses the first
Now that I re-read your definition, there is one difference between your
suggestion and my patch.
My patch just uses the first line to define the amount of whitespace to
strip, while you suggest we use the shortest indentation in the whole block.
Which is better?
//D
On 10/29/07, Malcolm
Ok I got the patch.
Should I open a ticket?
I attached it, but not sure if it will get through to the mailing list.
I also attached a semi-comprehensive battery of tests, showing the outcome
of the stripping process.
Basically it strips indentation based on the indentation of the first line
of
On Oct 31, 3:56 am, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30-Oct-07, at 10:55 PM, webjunkie wrote:
>
> >> Err, what was the old version, and what's the new version?
>
> >> "Upgrade" is kind of vague. :-/
>
> > Upgraded from 3.2.10 to 3.3.1 ;)
>
> which is 8 months old ;-)
and still
I prefer to store the actual value in database in many cases instead of an
assigned numerical or other representation so I find myself doing this:
color_choices = [(c,c) for c in ["red", "blue", "green"]]
It's not a difficult work-around but I would love to see Django accept a 1
dimensional list
*My dear friends I am announcing you'll an easy way to earn money that is
by just clicking on ads. So go to this link and register yourself in
clixsense and start earning money. This is not a scam and this is not a
misleading mail. First of all try this out and join, then you'll find that
On Oct 30, 6:26 pm, "Jeremy Dunck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's always bugged me a little that choice lookups are based on the raw value.
Agreed, but bloating the API doesn't solve that.
Oh and a tip:
FOO_CHOICES = enumerate(("foo", "bar"))
Throw on a tuple() if you want to use the in
Hi Ed,
There are a few people looking at multi-db at the moment. I've had to put my
own contributions on hold because I've had rather a hectic personal life
lately, but hopefully I'll be able to crack on with it next week or so.
There has also been some discussion about rethinking some of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
