Re: QuerySet.values() Shallow Copy

On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 17:59 -0700, Vitaly wrote: > I am using django version 1.0 and ran into shallow copy limitation of > QuerySet.values() where it returns ints for ForeignKey columns. Here > is my take on deep copy implementation. Instead of leaping right into a proposed solution, can you

Re: WTForm should be inbuilt to Django, and make admin & others use it.

I really hate to be a pessimist, but if the functionality already exists for that much generation, why bother integrating it with the main django package? On Mar 18, 8:06 pm, Jari Pennanen wrote: > WTForm is simple implementation built on top of existing (new)forms to >

WTForm should be inbuilt to Django, and make admin & others use it.

WTForm is simple implementation built on top of existing (new)forms to help create fieldsets, and by judging django snippets alone one can see it's a huge hole in Django. Everyone has wondered why the heck doing those fieldsets is such a pain when in admin it is super easy, and it turns out the

Re: Work on #9964

Hi list, Responding to Jacob's message of yesterday, I worked a little more on this issue, and brought my patch to a working state, tests included. This revealed some issues with my approach, which I've documented on the patch. I would like to see this resolved for 1.1, either way. On Monday

Collapsable Inline Objects

I've started working on this and I was wondering if this would be a feature that would be nice to add to django.admin. If not, say -1, if you like the idea please keep readin and comment. I've added a new option to the InlineAdmin class called 'collapse'. If this is set to 'True' for the stacked

Re: Proposal: enable CSRF middleware by default

On Wednesday 18 March 2009 15:59:10 Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Luke Plant wrote: > > I propose adding the two [CSRF] middleware (view and response) to > > the MIDDLEWARE settings [...] > > I'm a somewhat reluctant +0 on this -- the content

Re: Progress with firebird driver ?

On Mar 16, 4:34 pm, mariuz wrote: > any progress with firebird driver ? I see an old post from 2008 if i > search the archives for firebird+database > Maybe I should try to create the tutorial db and add the patches > > I want to show some demo to the python meetup in boston

Re: Proposal: enable CSRF middleware by default

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Luke Plant wrote: > I propose adding the two [CSRF] middleware (view and response) to the > MIDDLEWARE > settings [...] I'm a somewhat reluctant +0 on this -- the content re-writing that the CSRF middleware does has always rubbed me the

Proposal: enable CSRF middleware by default

I have not been able to implement all of the CSRF proposals we made a while back in time for the beta (in particular, replacing the current CsrfResponseMiddleware with a template tag). However, significant improvements have been made, and it is much more useful by default. I propose adding