Hello everyone,
My name is Maxim Veytsman and I am a third year computer science
student at the University of Toronto.
There was a project idea in the wiki called "Improve Query Expressions
(F() syntax."
I have a list of syntactical improvements to handling of F expressions
especially with
Malcom,
I took a look at django-restapi and it seems like a great start.
Having been the mentor for the first run at it, what features would
you like to see added? If you have a minute, I think that would
definitely serve as a great guide.
Thanks,
Bill Konrad
On Mar 31, 9:15 pm, Malcolm
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> I like the sentiment and the goal - my only concern is the extent to
> which this is in scope for a Django GSoC project. If making this
> integration requires changes on the Django side, you're fine - but if
>
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Kevin Kubasik wrote:
Hi Kevin!
> The Problem
> ***
>
> Django has a fantastic set of regression tests which cover much of the
> codebase, but the famous Admin interface isn't covered by any sort of
> automated tests.
Not
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 17:31 -0700, Bill Konrad wrote:
> First off, thanks for taking the time to read through it and give so
> much feedback.
>
> Please let me clarify one thing. If you read the above as a proposal
> than it wouldn't have seemed much like a proposal. I was only
> outlining
For the record, here is a list of somewhat related projects:
http://opensource.washingtontimes.com/projects/django-apibuilder/
http://github.com/ingenieroariel/dapi/
http://code.google.com/p/django-restapi/
http://github.com/fiam/wapi/
First off, thanks for taking the time to read through it and give so
much feedback.
Please let me clarify one thing. If you read the above as a proposal
than it wouldn't have seemed much like a proposal. I was only
outlining what a REST API module (I know you don't like that naming)
would need
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 15:36 -0700, Bill Konrad wrote:
> Ivan,
>
> Thanks for the quick feedback. What I meant by predictable (and maybe
> it's the wrong word in this case) is that when assigning a URI to a
> resource, a convention is followed, not that the user can "predict"
> the URI itself.
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 14:35 -0700, bkonrad wrote:
> I was fortunate enough today to have a quick chat with Jacob Kaplan-
> Moss about the concept of a generic REST API module for Django. We
> spoke about how this has been attempted before and some of the
> remaining issues that still require
Hi Luke --
I'm sorry it took me so long to review this patch, but I wanted to
make sure I knew what I was talking about first.
What you've done here is admirable, and I agree that the goal of
out-of-the-box CSRF protection is important, but ultimately I can't
get behind committing this.
It's
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 14:48 -0500, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> Malcolm, Jacob pointed me at you, since the code in question was a
> commit around QSRF-time.
>
> I'm aware of ticket #7539, but would prefer to keep the scope narrower
> and ask the hopefully-useful question-- is #9308 a bug? If so, I'd
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Bill Konrad wrote:
>
> Kaylan,
>
> Good point. That would have to be a part of the specification 100%.
> Any foreign key table entries that are "folded in" would have to check
> out with the permissions component.
>
> On Mar 31, 6:24 pm,
Kaylan,
Good point. That would have to be a part of the specification 100%.
Any foreign key table entries that are "folded in" would have to check
out with the permissions component.
On Mar 31, 6:24 pm, Kalyan Lanka wrote:
> I am not a Django developer but have
Ivan,
Thanks for the quick feedback. What I meant by predictable (and maybe
it's the wrong word in this case) is that when assigning a URI to a
resource, a convention is followed, not that the user can "predict"
the URI itself.
On Mar 31, 6:18 pm, Ivan Sagalaev
I am not a Django developer but have been closely following this group as I
have been in love with Django framework since I started using it. You guys
have done a great job.
>
>
> 6. Proper Links / Foreign Key Resources
>
>
If the request for primary key starts our sending out "foldable"
bkonrad wrote:
> 1.Predictable URI Naming
Apart from my serious doubt that this can be done at all I'd like to
point out that the very notion of *predicting* URLs is not RESTful. URLs
are generated by server (by whatever logic it chooses) and client treats
them as opaque identifiers. The
I was fortunate enough today to have a quick chat with Jacob Kaplan-
Moss about the concept of a generic REST API module for Django. We
spoke about how this has been attempted before and some of the
remaining issues that still require attention. After our chat, I
compiled a problem statement
So I'm here at PyCon and we keep getting more and more cool testing
ideas, I want them in Django, so I have teh following proposal, lemme
know what you think. I would love feedback of all flavors, both on the
application itself and what its proposing.
It's below in restructuredText:
Upgrade the
On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
>
> Malcolm, Jacob pointed me at you, since the code in question was a
> commit around QSRF-time.
>
> I'm aware of ticket #7539, but would prefer to keep the scope narrower
> and ask the hopefully-useful question-- is #9308 a bug? If so, I'd
>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Travis Parker wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> 2. settings (views -> apps, dj middleware -> wsgi middleware)
> i don't have nearly as nice a proposal for dealing with this. there
> are a lot of django views and middleware out there that would be nice
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Vinicius Mendes | meiocodigo.com <
vbmen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 3:35 pm, Joseph Kocherhans wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Vinicius Mendes >wrote:
> >
> > > What do you think about reopening
Malcolm, Jacob pointed me at you, since the code in question was a
commit around QSRF-time.
I'm aware of ticket #7539, but would prefer to keep the scope narrower
and ask the hopefully-useful question-- is #9308 a bug? If so, I'd
like to close it for 1.1.
In summary, #9308 describes a
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Travis Parker wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 12:04 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Travis Parker >wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > hello django devs,
> >
> > > It was
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Vinicius Mendes | meiocodigo.com <
vbmen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Joseph,
>
> I think the problem is still the same of the reported in the ticket,
> since the reporter talks about inlineformset_factory, so he is using
> InlineFormsets.
>
> Did you see the patch I
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Travis Parker wrote:
>
> hello django devs,
>
> It was nice to meet a few of you at pycon. I talked briefly with jacob
> about a plan to improve django's ability to play nice with the wsgi
> community with 2-way conversions between django
Joseph,
I think the problem is still the same of the reported in the ticket,
since the reporter talks about inlineformset_factory, so he is using
InlineFormsets.
Did you see the patch I put in dpaste? http://dpaste.com/21753/ It's
basically the same idea used in the changeset.
On Mar 31, 3:35
hello django devs,
It was nice to meet a few of you at pycon. I talked briefly with jacob
about a plan to improve django's ability to play nice with the wsgi
community with 2-way conversions between django views and wsgi apps,
and between django middleware and wsgi middleware.
I have started
Here is the problem demonstration:
http://dpaste.com/21801/
On Mar 31, 3:06 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Vinicius Mendes | meiocodigo.com <
>
>
>
> vbmen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Look at this link:
>
>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Vinicius Mendes wrote:
> In the ticket description, the user says that he is using
> inlineformset_factory, so do I. The changeset only fixes the FormSet.
> ModelFormSet and InlineFormSet are still bugged. In the methods
> save_new_objects and
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Vinicius Mendes | meiocodigo.com <
vbmen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Look at this link:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/trunk/django/forms/formsets.py
>
> I think your revision isn't the HEAD of trunk. The comment you said is
> in lines 227-229. But
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Vinicius Mendes | meiocodigo.com <
vbmen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I didn't understand. Line 216 is the docstring:
>
> """
> Returns True if form.errors is empty for every form in self.forms.
> """
>
> I don't want to create the cleaned data. I just adopted the
I didn't understand. Line 216 is the docstring:
"""
Returns True if form.errors is empty for every form in self.forms.
"""
I don't want to create the cleaned data. I just adopted the same logic
used in the patch to solve the problem. If the form doesn't have a
cleaned_data attr, so I get it
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> I'm in full agreement that "Improving the admin UI" is certainly a
> good pre-proposal, and I'm sure there's plenty of tickets that could
> fill a SoC. My concern is that "move to using jQuery" isn't a good
>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:44 PM, mrts wrote:
>
> Sorry if I sounded intrusive, what I meant was that prototyping with
> jQuery (or whatever other JS framework) may at the very least provide
> a quick way prove that a particular idea works (instead of a time-
> consuming
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> It would be _exceedingly_ unwise to advise any student to base a GSoC
>> proposal on the use of JQuery (or any other
Sorry if I sounded intrusive, what I meant was that prototyping with
jQuery (or whatever other JS framework) may at the very least provide
a quick way prove that a particular idea works (instead of a time-
consuming plain-JS implementation). But it is of course for the BDFLs
to decide if that is
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> It would be _exceedingly_ unwise to advise any student to base a GSoC
> proposal on the use of JQuery (or any other framework, for that
> matter).
D'oh.
The reason that Zain is including use of jQuery in this
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:02 PM, mrts wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2:41 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Correct. Django has very deliberately made a decision to avoid
>> blessing any single Javascript toolkit. It is unlikely that this will
>> change simply
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Russ Amos wrote:
> I appreciate you taking the time to identify my now-glaring misconceptions,
> Russ (... I have to laugh. I've never met another Russ).
Soon we will take over the world. :-)
> Would writing an appropriate template, while
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Julien Phalip wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 6:53 pm, zain wrote:
>> I'm applying for the GSoC with some thoughts to generally improve the
>> admin interface. So far, I have the following ideas:
>>
>> 1) An autocomplete widget
>> 2)
I think inplace edit functionality could be very useful. You can take a look
to this Django application:
https://tracpub.yaco.es/djangoapps/browser/inplaceeditform/trunk/inplaceeditform
For any model like that:
class Book(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=200)
body =
- Photo Management - crop, rotate (with ability to add more filters)
- Make it easier for people to create custom themes and styles for the
admin and change between them
- Allow models to be added twice with two modeladmins serving a different
process
---
Dougal Matthews - @d0ugal
Add and remove instances to/from formsets with a button click is much
needed instead of the current delete checkbox and `extra` handling
(both for formsets in general and for admin formsets in particular).
There is a snippet (that I've not tried) at
http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/1389/
.
- Dynamic Managers
- Select which field you want to filter by and boom. No hard code
- Finer Permissions (not exactly an interface suggestion)
- Limit the ability of a user right down to the created object
- You have many accounts and you can assign an agent permissions to
I'm applying for the GSoC with some thoughts to generally improve the
admin interface. So far, I have the following ideas:
1) An autocomplete widget
2) Drag & Drop support for ordered relations
3) Foreign Key traversal to see and modify models referenced to by
ForeignKeys inline
4) Refactor the
45 matches
Mail list logo