Hello devs,
As you know, the view django.views.defaults.server_error() uses Context
instead of RequestContext.
There are 2 tickets about it:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5617
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6377 (duplicated)
ubernostrum explaied why it works that way:
"The default serv
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Simon Willison wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 12:25 am, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> > My question would be how is using a DSN and letting those be passed
> directly
> > to using() any advantage over letting someone pass a dict of those
> options
> > to using(), or a connection ob
On Apr 30, 12:25 am, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> My question would be how is using a DSN and letting those be passed directly
> to using() any advantage over letting someone pass a dict of those options
> to using(), or a connection object itself.
No advantage at all - I'm interested in being able to h
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Joey Wilhelm wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 16:03, Simon Willison wrote:
>
>> 3. (really nutty one this) - a very high scale situation where an
>> application is partitioned across hundreds of databases, which each
>> one having the same set of tables. This is h
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 16:03, Simon Willison wrote:
> 3. (really nutty one this) - a very high scale situation where an
> application is partitioned across hundreds of databases, which each
> one having the same set of tables. This is how WordPress-MU works (as
> used by wordpress.com), with ever
On Apr 25, 7:11 am, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Simon uses a new DSN based syntax for specifying DBs, however I find this
> pretty akward in the presence of our existing way for defining DB settings.
I had a few reasons for suggesting DSNs:
* We already use DSN-style syntax for cache backends - it's w
Thanks, and sorry for posting to the wrong list!
2009/4/29 Alex Gaynor
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Andrew Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Sorry, this is probably a silly question but I'm fairly new to
>>> python/django.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Andrew Smith wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> Sorry, this is probably a silly question but I'm fairly new to
>> python/django. Is it possible to have django 1.0.x and the svn version
>> installed side by side and if
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Andrew Smith wrote:
> Hello
>
> Sorry, this is probably a silly question but I'm fairly new to
> python/django. Is it possible to have django 1.0.x and the svn version
> installed side by side and if so, how do I achieve this?
>
> The reason I ask is that I'm devel
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Andrew Smith wrote:
> Sorry, this is probably a silly question but I'm fairly new to
> python/django. Is it possible to have django 1.0.x and the svn version
> installed side by side and if so, how do I achieve this?
PYTHONPATH is what you want to learn about her
Hello
Sorry, this is probably a silly question but I'm fairly new to
python/django. Is it possible to have django 1.0.x and the svn version
installed side by side and if so, how do I achieve this?
The reason I ask is that I'm developing production code against 1.0.x. I've
found a bug in that vers
This is a question that should be directed to django-users.
Django-developers is a list dedicated to discussing of developing django
itself.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:53 PM, megaman821 wrote:
>
> I see fckeditor has python functions for its quick upload and image
> browsing. Is anyone using this
I see fckeditor has python functions for its quick upload and image
browsing. Is anyone using this? If so, how do you set up Apache to
serve the fckeditor pages?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Djang
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:33 AM, ken keller wrote:
>
> form.as_table is appealing but seems limited:
Ken, the consensus seems to be that the form.as_* methods are for
quick prototyping and not really meant for fine grained control. If
you want more control over the output of the form, build it
form.as_table is appealing but seems limited:
* Many forms need field groups to be highlighted.
* Sometimes multiple fields need to be in the same row (e.g., first &
last name).
* The use of for errorlist can cause layout problems.
Sometimes I need to add non-bound fields to a bound form such as
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, wrote:
> Thanks for the update. Here is what I have found. I ran the tests on python
> 2.4 and python 2.5. The error only seems to occur in python 2.6. Here is
> what I found regarding this error
>
> http://bugs.python.org/issue3210
>
>
>
I don't that that Python
I've created new templates for the applications and projects which has
major features as:
* settings has been splitted into a directory for better manage
* all settings related to media, admin and debug are set automatically
(included its urls)
* creates a full directory structure (following reco
17 matches
Mail list logo
