On 18 October 2010 01:49, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> However, you will note that the topic guide that Andrew prepared has a
> section heading specifically targeted at JSON responses. That section
> isn't written yet, but the idea is to put in a guide on how to handle
Thinking about it more, I think that the approach you took makes more
sense.
Regards,
Eduardo
On Oct 17, 7:49 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:00 AM, legutierr wrote:
>
> > On Oct 17, 11:58 am, Russell Keith-Magee
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:00 AM, legutierr wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 17, 11:58 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
>>
>> I should also be able to port the tutorial before I commit -- which,
>> barring
On Oct 17, 3:51 pm, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
>
> Currently, you can override only how successful responses are
> rendered. I'm going to try to work on this on my branch, but I have a
> small problem: In number of places, views raise Http404 which then get
> rendered by the
On 17 October 2010 23:29, George Sakkis wrote:
> On Oct 17, 5:58 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
>>
>>
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Justin
On 17 October 2010 20:00, legutierr wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 17, 11:58 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
>>
>> I should also be able to port the tutorial before I commit -- which,
>> barring
On Oct 17, 11:58 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
>
> I should also be able to port the tutorial before I commit -- which,
> barring objection, I will do tomorrow night my time (about 24 hours
> from now). Speak now,
I came across an issue when comparing a model proxy instance and a
model instance, that is:
obj1 = Entry.objects.get(id=1)
obj2 = EntryProxy.objects.get(id=1)
obj1 == obj2 # False
This I feel is a bug and the culprit is in ``Model.__eq__`` where it
tests to see if the object being
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Justin Lilly wrote:
>> Because you asked, I think this sounds like a great idea.
>>
>> When you have decided you like the API for create/update
>>