Re: unittest.TestCase vs. django.test.TestCase in overview example

2013-03-30 Thread Brian Schott
There is really a bigger question in my mind about the appropriateness of using django.utils.unittest in the testing overview section. It is an optimization that the warning admits is fairly limited for real testing and is premature for the first example. It would be better to break out the

Re: Kickstarter for Django Admin?

2013-03-30 Thread Amirouche Boubekki
> > [1] http://amirouche.github.com/blog/django-admin-next-a-new-api.html > this doesn't work anymore I moved @ http://blog-amirouche.dotcloud.com/notes/2013/admin-next-a-new-api.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To

Re: Kickstarter for Django Admin?

2013-03-30 Thread Amirouche Boubekki
2013/3/30 Victor Hooi > heya, > > Aha, yes - we need a roadmap, and somebody from the team to execute it > *grins*. > > For the former - I believe there was already discussions on that sort of > thing on this board? > > There's a wiki page with some notes as well: > >

Re: Kickstarter for Django Admin?

2013-03-30 Thread Victor Hooi
heya, Aha, yes - we need a roadmap, and somebody from the team to execute it *grins*. For the former - I believe there was already discussions on that sort of thing on this board? There's a wiki page with some notes as well: https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/AdminNext I also had a look at

Re: Testing project code that resides outside of installed apps

2013-03-30 Thread Carl Meyer
Hi, On 03/30/2013 10:32 AM, Yo-Yo Ma wrote: > A common pattern for larger applications is to maintain bits of reusable > code outside of applications, but still inside of a project (e.g., > myproject/lib), due to synchronous development and modification of > application and library code. They're

Re: Is there a buildbot? Is there a waterfall? Do the tests pass against all backends?

2013-03-30 Thread Shai Berger
On Tuesday 19 March 2013, Florian Apolloner wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:21:05 AM UTC+1, Shai Berger wrote: > > Is there any interest in fixing this, specifically? > > Sure, I just don't have to knowledge to debug cx_Oracle, so if you are up > to please. Although I think the

Re: unittest.TestCase vs. django.test.TestCase in overview example

2013-03-30 Thread Lorin Hochstein
Will dropping support for Python 2.6 have any effect here? I assumed the example would just switch to using unittest.TestCase instead of django.utils.unittest.TestCase, and the usability issue would remain. I think having the warning above the example would help, but I'd still prefer having

Testing project code that resides outside of installed apps

2013-03-30 Thread Yo-Yo Ma
A common pattern for larger applications is to maintain bits of reusable code outside of applications, but still inside of a project (e.g., myproject/lib), due to synchronous development and modification of application and library code. They're parts that aren't really large enough to warrant

Re: javascript view for named urls

2013-03-30 Thread Bernhard Ja
Am Freitag, 29. März 2013 21:05:05 UTC+1 schrieb Andrew Ingram: > > I like the concept of this, because it's something I've often wanted > myself. But I want to bring up a couple of points: > > 1) Some websites rely on the obscurity of some of their URLs as an > additional security measure

loaddata --ignorenonexistent not working for XML based fixtures

2013-03-30 Thread Christoph Sieghart
Hey, three weeks ago I posted a patch and test. I just asked on IRC what to do to get things moving, and I was told to post to the mailing list about it. The issue is: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/19998 Patch and tests are included. best regards, Christoph -- You received this