Re: [GSoC 2013] Improving code quality

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > So - the secret to getting into the GSoC isn't the project title you pick - > it's the quality of your proposal. This. A thousand times this. I think there's a perception among people applying to GSOC that

Re: [GSoC 2013] Improving code quality

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Alex Ogier wrote: > I wouldn't claim to speak for Django GSoC mentors and what they will > accept, but I can say that the "Improve Django's code/error handling" > projects have been perennial on Django's Recommended Project list for a >

Re: list_filter_incremental for ModelAdmin (#19755)

On Thursday, April 18, 2013 8:46:02 PM UTC+2, Michael Manfre wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Przemysław Suliga > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, April 18, 2013 7:59:59 PM UTC+2, Michael Manfre wrote: >>> >>> - What should happen if not all of the filters

Re: [GSoC 2013] Improving code quality

I wouldn't claim to speak for Django GSoC mentors and what they will accept, but I can say that the "Improve Django's code/error handling" projects have been perennial on Django's Recommended Project list for a while now, I think without any successful proposals (though "Improve Django's security"

Re: list_filter_incremental for ModelAdmin (#19755)

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Przemysław Suliga wrote: > > > On Thursday, April 18, 2013 7:59:59 PM UTC+2, Michael Manfre wrote: >> >> - What should happen if not all of the filters on a ModelAdmin support >> being incremental? Exception, allow some filters to yield empty

Re: list_filter_incremental for ModelAdmin (#19755)

On Thursday, April 18, 2013 7:59:59 PM UTC+2, Michael Manfre wrote: > > A few questions and comments. > > - The potentially huge performance hit would need to be called out in the > documentation. Hit would be from more queries and less opportunities (more > complexity) to cache filter

Re: list_filter_incremental for ModelAdmin (#19755)

A few questions and comments. - The potentially huge performance hit would need to be called out in the documentation. Hit would be from more queries and less opportunities (more complexity) to cache filter options. - What should happen if not all of the filters on a ModelAdmin support being

list_filter_incremental for ModelAdmin (#19755)

Hi, This ticket is about making `FieldListFilter`s specified in `ModelAdmin.list_filter` alive in sense that they change according to what is currently displayed in changelist. https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/19755 So these new (incremental) filters will contain only choices which when

Re: [GSoC 2013] Improving code quality

And how would you rate the chances that these projects will be selected for GSoC? Or which of all proposed projects have the most priority to you? I'd be very happy to join Django community and have chance to improving code quality (not only adding new features) would also be great. On

Messages templates documentation

could be expand to provide more guidance on how to implement this. For example, should messages be dealt with at the site template level, or at the application template level? This is particularly relevant if

Re: Support for WSGI applications within Django (Ticket #12091)

Hello, Any update on this? Cheers. - Gustavo. On Friday, April 12, 2013 3:29:49 PM UTC+1, Gustavo Narea wrote: > > Hi Jacob, > > On Friday, April 12, 2013 3:09:40 PM UTC+1, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Gustavo Narea >> wrote: