Re: first() and last(), earliest() and latest()

Significantly better. The latter method loads every single model in the queryset into Python, potentially the whole database! On May 15, 2013 9:24 PM, "Lee Trout" wrote: > Is qs[:1][0] better form than list(qs)[0]? > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Selwin Ong

Re: first() and last(), earliest() and latest()

Is qs[:1][0] better form than list(qs)[0]? On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Selwin Ong wrote: > I've updated the first() and last() to not accept any arguments. Please > review it and let me know if there's anything else I need to change. > Hopefully this can get merged

Re: Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

On May 15, 2013, at 9:01 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > Hi folks -- > > Does anyone have some clever thoughts on how to solve #16650? > > https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16550#comment:7 is a good > summary of the problem: if you're using extensions, you need a way to

Re: Perception of attitude in tickets

The fact that one of the core founders of Django has responded to say "Consider it done", is probably about as official as it can get. I have gone ahead and written up a section explaining how the 5-for-1 system works, any amendments or additions would be welcomed.

Anyone have ideas on #16550 - custom SQL before/after syncdb?

Hi folks -- Does anyone have some clever thoughts on how to solve #16650? https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16550#comment:7 is a good summary of the problem: if you're using extensions, you need a way to run some custom SQL in tests after the DB gets created by the test harness but before

Re: Perception of attitude in tickets

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] wrote: > * Make the 5-for-1 (or 10-for-1) system official, not many people seem to > realise this exists. This will give incentive to core devs to spend a bit > longer on a ticket, maybe even

Re: Perception of attitude in tickets

As suggested to me (privately) by Tom Evans, I've started trying to keep an eye on tickets that bounce back and forth between open and wontfix. If a ticket "bounces" a few times it's probably a sign that there's something going on, and we may want to proactively start a mailing list thread rather

Re: Reminder: pending Oracle fixes and issues

Hi, Resurrecting a 4-month-old thread: On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:05:16 Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > On 20 tammi, 02:52, Shai Berger wrote: > > Which still leaves two issues -- PR #393 (faster processign of numbers; I > > think I forgot to mention earlier -- it is just some

Re: Ticket 13978: Allow inline js/css in forms.Media

Re CSP It's more or less fine to start using it. It needs a clean API for configuring it still but it's pretty solid. However a newish feature that has been added is the ability to allow _some_ inline scripts but not all. This feature doesn't have widespread support yet sadly though. The

Re: Ticket 13978: Allow inline js/css in forms.Media

On 14 mai 2013, at 02:36, Derek Payton wrote: > I have a working patch with tests and docs for #13978, which would add the > ability to have inline JS and CSS in forms.Media. I feel that this ticket is > a much better solution than, e.g., scattering the required inline

Re: Remote participation in sprints

On 15 May 2013 20:29, Shai Berger wrote: > On Wednesday 15 May 2013, ptone wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:31:36 AM UTC-7, Daniele Procida wrote: > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013, Shai Berger > > > > > > > >Will there be an effective way to do this

Re: Perception of attitude in tickets

On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:20:41 AM UTC-7, Luke Plant wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > > On 14/05/13 00:55, Joe Tennies wrote: > > As a fellow lurker (sorry I've been using Flask more recently), I think > > this could simply be fixed via a form response. Here's a simple example: > > > > This bug is

Re: Remote participation in sprints

On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:31:36 AM UTC-7, Daniele Procida wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2013, Shai Berger > wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >This saturday and sunday there are supposed to be sprints in DjangoCon EU > in > >Warsaw. To my regret, I could not be present at

Re: Remote participation in sprints

On Wed, May 15, 2013, Shai Berger wrote: >Hi all, > >This saturday and sunday there are supposed to be sprints in DjangoCon EU in >Warsaw. To my regret, I could not be present at the conference. However, >I may >be able to set aside the two days and participate in the sprint

Remote participation in sprints

Hi all, This saturday and sunday there are supposed to be sprints in DjangoCon EU in Warsaw. To my regret, I could not be present at the conference. However, I may be able to set aside the two days and participate in the sprint remotely. Will there be an effective way to do this while

Re: Perception of attitude in tickets

On 15 mai 2013, at 12:20, Luke Plant wrote: > So I've gone ahead and created a wiki page, which can be longer and more > friendly, and require a shorter response on the actual ticket, something > like this: > > Closing as WONTFIX because ... > > If you want to

Re: first() and last(), earliest() and latest()

I've updated the first() and last() to not accept any arguments. Please review it and let me know if there's anything else I need to change. Hopefully this can get merged in during the sprints and make it into 1.6 :). The pull request is here: https://github.com/django/django/pull/1056 Best,

Re: Perception of attitude in tickets

On Wednesday 15 May 2013, Luke Plant wrote: > > So I've gone ahead and created a wiki page, which can be longer and more > friendly, and require a shorter response on the actual ticket, something > like this: > > Closing as WONTFIX because ... > > If you want to persuade us otherwise,

Re: Perception of attitude in tickets

Hi Joe, On 14/05/13 00:55, Joe Tennies wrote: > As a fellow lurker (sorry I've been using Flask more recently), I think > this could simply be fixed via a form response. Here's a simple example: > > This bug is being marked as "WONTFIX" because > > Please realize that every API/feature added