Re: CTRL-BREAK still make sense on Windows for `runserver`?

2021-06-21 Thread Carlton Gibson
I too realise I don't have a(n obvious) break key but have been happily hitting CTRL-C. On Monday, 21 June 2021 at 23:53:15 UTC+2 Adam Johnson wrote: > Would it be bad to have Django respond to both shortcuts? > I think as a matter of fact it does. At least using PowerShell/Win10/Etc —

Re: CTRL-BREAK still make sense on Windows for `runserver`?

2021-06-21 Thread 'Adam Johnson' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
Would it be bad to have Django respond to both shortcuts? On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 21:40, Matthew Pava wrote: > Ctrl + Break and Ctrl + C are treated slightly differently by Windows. > Ctrl + Break is always a signal, but an application can override the > functionality of Ctrl + C. > > > > Please

Re: `Model.validate_unique` excluding partial unique constraint

2021-06-21 Thread Gaga Ro
So am I right that the example model with deleted_at will not be validated by ModelForm as deleted_at will never be included in it? I tried implementing ExclusionConstraint.validate (https://github.com/Gagaro/django/commit/558f33f574838b21cc9bf58a825ef337e7b1d0b2) but I had to use RawSQL as I

RE: CTRL-BREAK still make sense on Windows for `runserver`?

2021-06-21 Thread Matthew Pava
Ctrl + Break and Ctrl + C are treated slightly differently by Windows. Ctrl + Break is always a signal, but an application can override the functionality of Ctrl + C. Please see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/console/ctrl-c-and-ctrl-break-signals I’ve dealt with this issue many

CTRL-BREAK still make sense on Windows for `runserver`?

2021-06-21 Thread wi...@wsvincent.com
Hi all, Is the Pause/Break key still a thing on Windows keyboards? My new Surface 4 doesn't even have such a key and I think this applies to many new Windows keyboards as well. I ask because the runserver.py command

Re: Fellow Reports - June 2021

2021-06-21 Thread Mariusz Felisiak
Week ending June 20, 2021 *Holidays ☀️* Best, Mariusz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: Fellow Reports - June 2021

2021-06-21 Thread Mariusz Felisiak
Week ending June 13, 2021 *Triaged: * https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32820 - Fields’ errors should be programmatically associated with fields. (accepted) https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32819 - Fields’ help text and errors should be associated with input. (accepted)

Re: `Model.validate_unique` excluding partial unique constraint

2021-06-21 Thread charettes
That's looking great :) 1. Yes and that's expected. If a form/serializer doesn't provide some fields included in the constraint the database client side of the validation can't do much about it. It might result in an integrity error but that's a misuse of the API. I guess a check/runtime

Re: `Model.validate_unique` excluding partial unique constraint

2021-06-21 Thread Gaga Ro
I tried my hand at implementing Q.check() (https://github.com/Gagaro/django/tree/ticket-30581). A few things: 1/ Is the exclude parameter there because of Model.validate_unique signature? Conditional UniqueConstraint might not work in those cases if a field use in a the condition is not in