Re: I want a pony: Django Cheeseshop

2008-09-14 Thread Martin Diers
On Sep 13, 2008, at 7:23 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Martin Diers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The answer is community packaging guidelines. Somebody needs to write >> or adapt an existing doc on how to package django

Re: I want a pony: Django Cheeseshop

2008-09-13 Thread Martin Diers
On Sep 10, 2008, at 9:31 AM, mrts wrote: > > This is for Django 2.0. > > Rationale: > > a) useful (and less-useful) Django apps are proliferating on Google > Code, djangoplugables.com and Django resources wiki page, > b) apps need refactoring (#3591, >

Re: ANNOUNCE: Django 1.0 released

2008-09-03 Thread Martin Diers
On Sep 3, 2008, at 7:07 PM, James Bennett wrote: > > The Django team is pleased to announce the release of Django 1.0 > this evening: > > Download: http://www.djangoproject.com/download/ > Release notes: http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.0/ > > Have fun with it, and we'll see you

Re: Admin area and user permissions bug?

2008-09-03 Thread Martin Diers
This is not a bug. It is how the permissions system works. So far as the Admin goes, it is model granular, not row granular or field granular, meaning that if you grant a user full access to the User object, as you did, they can do anything to that table, including change permission

Ticket: 6396 - Move HTML tags into change_list_results.html

2008-07-19 Thread Martin Diers
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6396 I just updated this ticket with a patch which moves the generation of html out of admin.templatetags.admin_list.items_for_result and into change_list_results.html. I needed this functionality in order to change the Name column to include

Re: Models created from querysets aren't constructed with constructor

2008-04-28 Thread Martin Diers
I could be wrong, but I believe that this is because a Model is not derived from the default __metaclass__, but is generated by a separate class factory which overrides the default behavior. On Apr 28, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Ivan Sagalaev wrote: > > Hello everyone (and especially Malcolm :-) ) >

Re: API question for model saving

2008-04-28 Thread Martin Diers
timately lead to a dead function. The cases where this is needed are rare enough that it makes no sense to change the semantics of the model, or risk breaking backward compatibility, particularly when a simple parameter can solve the problem. -- Martin Diers --~--~-~--~~

Re: BigIntegerField support: Ticket #399

2008-04-26 Thread Martin Diers
bclassed from such a type in a backend-neutral manner, i.e., no db_type() overrides. The ISBN example in the above presentation is a perfect example. I'm fairly new to Django, so I don't know if this fits with the philosophy. Just my thoughts. -- Martin Diers --~--~-~--~~--

BigIntegerField support: Ticket #399

2008-04-25 Thread Martin Diers
the unit tests that had been submitted with a previous patch. I submitted an updated patch, including the unit tests. I believe that Chris promoted the patch to Ready for Checkin. I generated the patch against trunk, but am using it on the newforms- admin branch. Thanks you, Martin Diers