On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:02 AM, KentH wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My ticket was closed by Pandres with the comment:
>
> Your path seems to add another way to do something that is already
> easy to do (and it's done all around in the code). It goes against the
> principle of "there should
Hi,
My ticket was closed by Pandres with the comment:
Your path seems to add another way to do something that is already
easy to do (and it's done all around in the code). It goes against the
principle of "there should be one obvious way to do it"
Great reason -- but the other path is not