Re: Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Tom X. Tobin wrote: > ... >> There are no formal plans (on experimental's side) to merge anything >> from experimental to trunk.  Anyone is welcome to package up

Re: Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kevin Howerton wrote: > From the github: > > "* Commits should be atomic: they should each encompass a single logical >change that works on its own. You can use "git rebase --interactive" to >collapse multiple commits into a

Re: Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

>From the github: "* Commits should be atomic: they should each encompass a single logical change that works on its own. You can use "git rebase --interactive" to collapse multiple commits into a single commit before pushing your code up for contribution." I think the idea is to

Re: Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Tom X. Tobin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Tom Evans wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Tom X. Tobin >> wrote: >>> That said, we don't want to degrade the

Re: Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Tom X. Tobin wrote: ... > There are no formal plans (on experimental's side) to merge anything > from experimental to trunk.  Anyone is welcome to package up code from > experimental and champion a change for inclusion in Django proper,

Re: Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Tom Evans wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Tom X. Tobin wrote: >> That said, we don't want to degrade the signal-to-noise ratio here, so >> we'll be working off of the mailing list Kevin mentioned. >> >

Re: Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Tom X. Tobin wrote: > That said, we don't want to degrade the signal-to-noise ratio here, so > we'll be working off of the mailing list Kevin mentioned. > Presumably, you will be discussing anything you plan to merge from

Re: Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Kevin Howerton wrote: > Thanks for the support Russ... > > I think Cujo (the name at least) has been abandoned and I have joined my > efforts with some other developers also interested in contributing to an > experimental branch. > >

Re: Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > Tom, it may be inconvenient at this point, but please consider forking > the github django repo so that upstream pulls can be handled more > easily. I've been running a private Git mirror of Django for a long time now,

Re: Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

Tom, it may be inconvenient at this point, but please consider forking the github django repo so that upstream pulls can be handled more easily. On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Kevin Howerton wrote: ... > I think Cujo (the name at least) has been abandoned and I have

Re: Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

Thanks for the support Russ... I think Cujo (the name at least) has been abandoned and I have joined my efforts with some other developers also interested in contributing to an experimental branch. http://github.com/tomxtobin/django-experimental

Re: Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Kevin Howerton wrote: > Cujo... for starters it's Amon Tobin's first moniker (he remixes jazz > into some delightful tunes, if you don't know of him I strongly > recommend you go to your local record store and pick up a copy of >

Cujo .... an experimental branch of django.

Cujo... for starters it's Amon Tobin's first moniker (he remixes jazz into some delightful tunes, if you don't know of him I strongly recommend you go to your local record store and pick up a copy of "Adventures in Foam"). Also, I felt it was somewhat apt due to the rabid nature of the