Hey guys! Any updates?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Aymeric Augustin <
aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> Several release blockers were discovered over the last two weeks.
>
> Most were fixed, two are still open:
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21197
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21164
>
Several release blockers were discovered over the last two weeks.
Most were fixed, two are still open:
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21197
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21164
At this point the ETA for 1.6 RC1 is really "once these tickets are fixed".
Thanks for your
2013/9/26 seocam
How are we going with the release process? Do we have a new date for the RC?
>
Well -- security issues got in the way :( and I'm still pondering over a
release
blocker: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21134
Hopefully I'll deal with it during the
Hi,
How are we going with the release process? Do we have a new date for the RC?
Cheers,
--
Sergio Oliveira
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 3:42:33 PM UTC-3, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>
> 2013/9/11
>
>> Do you have an update on the schedule for the the Final? I guess it
2013/9/11
> Do you have an update on the schedule for the the Final? I guess it would
> be any week now, but I have some internal factors that require me to ask
> for your updated forecast.
>
Hi Tony,
Since we released 1.6 beta 3 yesterday, the next step is to release 1.6 RC
Tim,
Do you have an update on the schedule for the the Final? I guess it would
be any week now, but I have some internal factors that require me to ask
for your updated forecast.
Thanks,
Tony
On Friday, August 16, 2013 7:14:48 AM UTC-7, Tim Graham wrote:
>
> Obviously, we've missed our
Obviously, we've missed our target for the release candidate. We're
currently targeting the week of August 26 for that, pending no new release
blockers.
You can help us make our goal by triaging unreviewed
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> Shouldn't we push the alpha to May 23rd, all the more since we plan to fork
> the stable/1.6.x branch at the beta?
That sounds reasonable; give us a chance to get any work done at
DjangoCon Europe into
2013/5/2 Andrew Godwin
> get something together for DjangoCon EU
That's a good point. DjangoCon EU sprints are on May 18-19th.
Shouldn't we push the alpha to May 23rd, all the more since we plan to fork
the stable/1.6.x branch at the beta?
--
Aymeric.
--
You received
PM, Carl Meyer <c...@oddbird.net> wrote:
> Hi Shai,
>
> On 04/30/2013 04:38 PM, Shai Berger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 April 2013, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> >> Hi folks -
> >>
> >> Unless there are strong objections, here's what I'm thinking for the
&
On 1 May 2013, at 00:35, Carl Meyer wrote:
> On 04/30/2013 05:27 PM, Andrew Ingram wrote:
>> Absolutely, there's no requirement to migrate, but it does have the
>> feel of an weird kind of deprecation. Obviously there are
>> workarounds, like you said, I can upgrade to 1.5
Hi Shai,
On 04/30/2013 04:38 PM, Shai Berger wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 April 2013, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>> Hi folks -
>>
>> Unless there are strong objections, here's what I'm thinking for the
>> Django 1.6 release timeline:
>>
>> Alpha: May 16
>>
On 04/30/2013 05:27 PM, Andrew Ingram wrote:
> Absolutely, there's no requirement to migrate, but it does have the
> feel of an weird kind of deprecation. Obviously there are
> workarounds, like you said, I can upgrade to 1.5 without changing
> user models (though that does involve incurring a bit
On 1 May 2013, at 00:13, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 2013, at 7:10 PM, Andrew Ingram wrote:
>
>> On 30 Apr 2013, at 23:38, Shai Berger wrote:
>>> I see one issue with this: According to current procedures, if this
>>>
On Apr 30, 2013, at 7:10 PM, Andrew Ingram wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2013, at 23:38, Shai Berger wrote:
>> I see one issue with this: According to current procedures, if this timeline
>> is followed, support for 1.4 will be dropped less than 6 months after
On 30 Apr 2013, at 23:38, Shai Berger wrote:
> I see one issue with this: According to current procedures, if this timeline
> is followed, support for 1.4 will be dropped less than 6 months after the
> release of 1.5. At least for some of us (which, as I mentioned earlier on
On Tuesday 30 April 2013, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> Unless there are strong objections, here's what I'm thinking for the
> Django 1.6 release timeline:
>
> Alpha: May 16
> Beta: June 20
> RC: Aug 1
> Final: as early as Aug 8, or later if more RCs are
On Apr 30, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <ja...@jacobian.org> wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> Unless there are strong objections, here's what I'm thinking for the
> Django 1.6 release timeline:
>
> Alpha: May 16
> Beta: June 20
> RC: Aug 1
> Final: as ear
Hi folks -
Unless there are strong objections, here's what I'm thinking for the
Django 1.6 release timeline:
Alpha: May 16
Beta: June 20
RC: Aug 1
Final: as early as Aug 8, or later if more RCs are needed.
Remember that Alpha is the deadline for "big" features, so if you've
got
20 matches
Mail list logo