On 7/21/06, monkeynut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, patch mark 2 is up.. the only problem (and it might be a biggie) is that
> this effectively breaks things for people who're using the arguments in
> their intended way (eg. getting tomorrow and yesterday, etc.)?
>
> Pete.
I think the two poss
OK, patch mark 2 is up.. the only problem (and it might be a biggie) is that this effectively breaks things for people who're using the arguments in their intended way (eg. getting tomorrow and yesterday, etc.)?Pete.
On 7/21/06, Pete Crosier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tyson, Jacob - I've put up a p
Tyson, Jacob - I've put up a patch for this, let me know if it's what you were looking for, or just plain stoopid.Cheers, Pete.On 7/21/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 20, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Tyson Tate wrote:> On Jul 20, 2006, at 8:41 PM, James Bennett wrote: 10. Navigat
On Jul 20, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Tyson Tate wrote:
> On Jul 20, 2006, at 8:41 PM, James Bennett wrote:
>
>>> 10. Navigate to /blog/2006/jul/
>>> PROBLEM: Last month is listed as a previous month even though there
>>> are no objects created last month. Yes, this is documented behavior.
>>> But why? W
Thanks again to James for catching the problems in my test case - it
looks like I made a number of mistakes in the translation from my
real project to the minimal test case and didn't catch them. I really
appreciate the help.
On Jul 20, 2006, at 8:41 PM, James Bennett wrote:
>> 10. Navigat
On 7/20/06, Tyson Tate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 8. Navigate to the root page, the "archive view".
> PROBLEM: There are no years listed under the year list (i.e. no
> objects in "date_list"). The docs say that "date_list" contains "A
> list of datetime.date objects representing all years that h
Here's an excellent suggestion for the proposed code sprint to 0.95:
Fix date-based generic view bugs.
I've created a minimal test case for these problems, which can be had
here:
http://fallingbullets.com/test_proj.zip
Here's the instructions for exactly how I made it and what problems I
On 7/18/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't had a chance to look at this issue, but I'll point out thatthere's no way this is a "show-stopper" problem, given that, ifgeneric views don't suit you, you can just write five-or-so lines of
view code manually...AdrianBut surely bugs
On 7/18/06, Tyson Tate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way I can get a response on this? I really hate to be
> annoying and pedantic, but the following problems are literally show-
> stopper problems for my Django projects and they're holding up what
> is otherwise a working project. I w
Simon Willison wrote:
> Can you provide code (a model + your view configuration) to allow the
> bug to be easily reproduced?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Simon
Certainly-
Model: http://paste.e-scribe.com/774/
blog/urls.py: http://paste.e-scribe.com/773/
templatetags: http://paste.e-scribe.com/775/
entry_ar
On 18 Jul 2006, at 16:19, Tyson Tate wrote:
> Is there any way I can get a response on this? I really hate to be
> annoying and pedantic, but the following problems are literally show-
> stopper problems for my Django projects and they're holding up what
> is otherwise a working project. I would
Is there any way I can get a response on this? I really hate to be
annoying and pedantic, but the following problems are literally show-
stopper problems for my Django projects and they're holding up what
is otherwise a working project. I would really appreciate something -
anything!
Regar
Note: I originally posted part of the following to the users list,
but I realized today that it's probably better posted here because it
deals with a potential bug and developer rationale behind some
generic view behavior that I find very odd. Sorry for the cross-post!
---
Using the latest
13 matches
Mail list logo
