On Jun 23, 2008, at 19:45, AmanKow wrote:
> Actually, 'required' is an argument to the *Model* field constructor,
> and models are *not* always initialized from html forms. The field
> certainly doesn't have to be represented as a checkbox in a form,
> either.
> [...]
Yes, all of that is
hmmm... next time, coffee first, post second. Appologies...
On Jun 23, 1:55 pm, Collin Grady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AmanKow said the following:
>
> > Actually, 'required' is an argument to the *Model* field constructor,
> > and models are *not* always initialized from html forms. The
AmanKow said the following:
> Actually, 'required' is an argument to the *Model* field constructor,
> and models are *not* always initialized from html forms. The field
> certainly doesn't have to be represented as a checkbox in a form,
> either.
This is incorrect. Model fields have null and
Probably not the place for this discussion, but...
On Jun 22, 3:08 pm, Ludvig Ericson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ambiguous in this context. Two perceptions exist:
> - required=True means the field has to be set. Following HTML form
> logics, it always is.
> - required=True means the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 19, 2008, at 08:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'll go ahead and add http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5957 to the
> list of DDN tickets that could use a resolution pre-1.0, IMO this
> ticket should be pretty noncontroversial and i
Can I recommend http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4102 for the list? :)
--
Collin Grady
Bumper sticker:
All the parts falling off this car are of the very finest
British manufacture.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
I'll go ahead and add http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5957 to the
list of DDN tickets that could use a resolution pre-1.0, IMO this
ticket should be pretty noncontroversial and is a clear bug, but
evidently not everyone agrees, so a ruling from the gods on high
should hopefully sort it out
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Jeff Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4996 - I don't know if it would be a
> good idea to make 'runserver' run as a daemon. Maybe it would be ok of there
> was a warning before forking.
I think that if somebody want to
I had a few comments on some of these and was going to post them to
the tickets so they don't get lost, but my browsers acting up and
closing when I try to login, so I'm posting here.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Jeff Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> *
Hey Jeff --
Thanks for doing this! If you want to make it a regular thing, please feel free.
I've reviewed and marked the ones I feel qualified to call (#4996,
#6709, #6496, and #6932); I think Joseph should call #2259 and Russ
#6719.
Jacob
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
This is helpful, and it is the right way to go about it. The only way
to improve on this would be to include more than just your opinion,
and summarize any debate (if any) that has occurred on the ticket.
Sounds great!
I'll definitely include that in any future
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Jeff Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've picked a few tickets that have been marked as "Design Decision Needed".
> I am only interested in getting discussion going to help reduce the backlog
> of tickets that exist right now. I will voice my opinion on each
12 matches
Mail list logo
