Small typo in my previous post. Clearly I meant I'll open the PR next
year...
Better late than never, here is the PR with changes from my previous draft
based on everyone's input:
https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com/pull/1406
Thanks again for all the feedback.
On Friday, November
I like that idea, Tim. A few things came up, so I'll open this PR next week.
Thanks,
Andrew
On Friday, November 11, 2022 at 12:21:43 PM UTC-5 schill...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Andrew (Mshar) how do you feel about reworking:
>
> > If you know someone who you think should be considered
Hi folks!
Andrew (Mshar) how do you feel about reworking:
> If you know someone who you think should be considered for Individual
Membership or would like to nominate yourself, please fill out this form
Just want to pop in and say these are great ideas - feel free to copy me in
on any PR if you want extra opinions!
On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 8:26:28 AM UTC-7 Carlton Gibson wrote:
> Great, Thanks Andrew. No urgency
>
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 16:16, Andrew Mshar wrote:
>
>> Will do,
Great, Thanks Andrew. No urgency
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 16:16, Andrew Mshar wrote:
> Will do, Carlton.
>
> Tim and Cory, thanks for the suggestions. I'll incorporate those in the PR
> and post here when it's ready. Probably not today, but I should be able to
> open it before the end of the
Will do, Carlton.
Tim and Cory, thanks for the suggestions. I'll incorporate those in the PR
and post here when it's ready. Probably not today, but I should be able to
open it before the end of the week.
Thanks,
Andrew
On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 10:10:51 AM UTC-5 carlton...@gmail.com
Hey Andrew.
I had thought this was a Flatpage (stored in the database) but it's not.
The source is here:
https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com/blob/main/djangoproject/templates/members/individualmember_list.html
If you wanted to open a PR suggesting your changes, that would be amazing 朗
Hey Tim!
> I'm of the opinion that if you care enough about Django to investigate
becoming a member of the DSF, that's enough of a qualification...
OK, so this is the point about whether or not we need another membership
level... — DSF membership has been "The DSF appoints individual Members in
I'm of the opinion that if you care enough about Django to investigate
becoming a member of the DSF, that's enough of a qualification - it is just
challenging to formalize that into proper text for the website. Maybe two
changes to encourage people to join:
- We could tweak *"Running
Hey Andrew,
Thanks for drafting this language and I think it looks great. As someone
who only recently applied after hearing it discussed on an episode of
Django Chat[1], I'm all for the goals of making it more encouraging and
accessible and think this is a great step in that direction.
Here are
Suggested new language:
The following are Individual Members of the Django Software Foundation.
Individual Members are appointed by the DSF in recognition of their service
to the Django community.
Service to the Django community takes many forms. Here are some examples
(non-exhaustive) of
That would be awesome, yes. Fresh eyes likely see more clearly :)
And equally. :)
Thanks.
C.
On Thursday, 27 October 2022 at 15:28:09 UTC+2 acm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Regarding Carlton's points, that does clarify, and I agree about the open
> ended qualifiers. I also agree with Tim's
Regarding Carlton's points, that does clarify, and I agree about the open
ended qualifiers. I also agree with Tim's points. I'm not sure we need
another membership level (I'm not opposed, though). Rather, I think making
the current page more transparent will help more folks feel welcome and
Hi Carlton,
I think I might have been one of those people mentioning the lack of
definition around the membership requirements. It has held me back from
applying (finally sent one in yesterday). Given the process's obscurity
(see below), it's daunting to hit submit.
- The number of potential
Hi Andrew.
Yes. Good question. I'm not immediately sure if there is a better
description of DSF membership around. 樂
It's meant to be a recognition of contribution to the community, be that to
the code in django/django, maintaining a third-party package,
organising a DjangoCon or community
Along the lines of discussions about redefining requirements for board
seats (e.g. https://groups.google.com/g/django-developers/c/FbNaAq3rz6c), I
think it would be helpful to clarify what we want from individual members
of the DSF here:
16 matches
Mail list logo
