I finally submitted my proposal to the google melange homepage. The core of
the proposal is very much unchanged to the first draft, however I've included
passages that indicate that the syntax might change in further discussions
about this topic and that the concept of a chrome will be propably
Sorry for the quite late response, everything is getting pretty close to the
deadline. I'm not happy with it but I need to tackle some personal issues at
once.
2011/4/5 Russell Keith-Magee :
>
> ...
>
> In particular, I have two objections:
> * it feels like it's trying
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Gregor Müllegger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/4/2 Russell Keith-Magee :
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Gregor Müllegger
>> wrote:
>> Firstly, while it looks fine for a small example, I can see
2011/4/4 Daniel Greenfeld :
> Anyway, as the current lead on Django Uni-Form I think its great that Gregor
> is picking up the torch for refactoring form rendering in Django 1.40. He's
> obviously done his homework and put a lot of thought into this critical part
> of Django.
>
First off, for some arcane reason Google is forcing formatting on me.
Hopefully that doesn't make this email that ugly.
Anyway, as the current lead on Django Uni-Form I think its great that Gregor
is picking up the torch for refactoring form rendering in Django 1.40. He's
obviously done his
Haven't got time for a full review of this proposal right now, but I've done
a lot of thinking about this area already and am more than happy for anyone
to steal my ideas and compare thoughts.
Shoot me an email off-list or catch me on #django (as SmileyChris) if you
want to discuss more
Hi,
2011/4/2 Russell Keith-Magee :
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Gregor Müllegger
> wrote:
>> I suggest reading this proposal online: https://gist.github.com/898375
>> It's exactly the same as below but formated nicely.
>>
>>
>> GSoC 2011
Hi Yuri,
thanks for your toughts.
2011/4/2 burc...@gmail.com :
> Gregor,
>
> Regarding proposal itself,
>
> the idea to make django form rendering based on templates is good, but
> I think it should be simple, modular and not much verbose.
> I'd like more to see more modular,
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Secondly, it may be possible to play a trick on the template compiler.
> Jonas Obrist suggested this trick to me at Djangocon (US) last year;
> however, I haven't had a chance to dig into it any more.
>
> The
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Gregor Müllegger wrote:
> I suggest reading this proposal online: https://gist.github.com/898375
> It's exactly the same as below but formated nicely.
>
>
> GSoC 2011 Proposal - Revised form rendering
>
Hi, thanks for your fast feedback. I was really looking forward to your input,
I haven't reached you in IRC before.
2011/4/1 Carl Meyer :
> Hi Gregor,
>
> As you've probably seen in past threads, this is an area where I'm quite
> motivated to see some improvement. I think you've
Hi Gregor,
As you've probably seen in past threads, this is an area where I'm quite
motivated to see some improvement. I think you've got quite a strong
proposal here in general, and you've clearly done your homework, so my
comments below dive directly into the details:
On 04/01/2011 11:57 AM,
12 matches
Mail list logo