Re: Template Caching - Ticket #6262

K, I just uploaded another patch to ticket #6262. Comments inline. On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Mike Malone wrote: >> Sup, >> >> I've been working on template caching (ticket #6262)

Re: Template Caching - Ticket #6262

Am 16.11.2009 um 15:31 schrieb Russell Keith-Magee: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Alex Gaynor > wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Russell Keith-Magee >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Mike Malone

Re: Template Caching - Ticket #6262

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Mike Malone wrote: >>> Sup, >>> >>> I've been working on template caching

Re: Template Caching - Ticket #6262

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Mike Malone wrote: >> Sup, >> >> I've been working on template caching (ticket #6262) with a mister >> Alex Gaynor. The patch is getting pretty stable and I

Re: Template Caching - Ticket #6262

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Mike Malone wrote: > Sup, > > I've been working on template caching (ticket #6262) with a mister > Alex Gaynor. The patch is getting pretty stable and I think it's close > to merge-able, so if anyone wants to take a look at what we've got and >

Re: Template Caching - Ticket #6262

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Mike Malone wrote: > Sup, > > I've been working on template caching (ticket #6262) with a mister > Alex Gaynor. The patch is getting pretty stable and I think it's close > to merge-able, so if anyone wants to take a look at what we've got and >

Re: Template Caching - Ticket #6262

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Mike Malone wrote: > Sup, > > I've been working on template caching (ticket #6262) with a mister > Alex Gaynor. The patch is getting pretty stable and I think it's close > to merge-able, so if anyone wants to take a look at what we've got and >

Re: Template Caching

> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Russell > Keith-Magee wrote: >> As is noted in the ticket, one of the reasons that this wasn't done >> originally was that the performance boost wasn't seen as being that >> considerable. > > I suspect there'll be a goodly speedup even for

Re: Template Caching

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > > Hi Mike -- > > Ah, it looks like my strategy of "wait for someone else to reply and > hope that he sums up my feelings so that I don't have to bother" has > worked perfectly. Thanks, Russ! > > [IOW: I agree

Re: Template Caching

I won't speak to most of this, since Russ and Jacob have said it all, but I do want to respond to one point. On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: >> By simply checking that the template has a ``render`` method in >> ``get_template``, we get the added

Re: Template Caching

Hi Mike -- Ah, it looks like my strategy of "wait for someone else to reply and hope that he sums up my feelings so that I don't have to bother" has worked perfectly. Thanks, Russ! [IOW: I agree completely with Russ.] I'll be digging into this patch in some detail, but based on what I've seen

Re: Template Caching

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Mike Malone wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I've been working on a patch for Django that would allow you to optionally > cache templates after they've been lexed and parsed (compiled) by the > template engine. I've got things far enough along that I