Guys, this is really degenerating into a bikeshed issue. Let it rest
for a while, OK? Endless "me too" comments don't add anything useful
to the discussion, and there are larger and more important things to
be working on right now.
And if anybody feels the need to post a snarky comment about
On Dec 21, 2007 4:42 AM, Robert Šmol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As my 0.02 cents of new comer I can confirm this was one of the things
> that slows adoption of Django. Proposed change to have ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX to
> be /admin_media/ (or either /media/admin/ ) makes more sense (at least for
>
As my 0.02 cents of new comer I can confirm this was one of the things that
slows adoption of Django. Proposed change to have ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX to be
/admin_media/ (or either /media/admin/ ) makes more sense (at least for me).
When I started with django I was confused with when I used /media for
On Dec 19, 2007 4:26 AM, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I find mildly amusing is Malcolm's comment in the ticket [1]
> which is pretty much the opposite of what he's saying now. In his
> defence, he did say he would have to think about it for a bit
> longer ;)
What strikes me
> Over-engineered? A documentation change, plus a one-line config
> change? Surely not! What would be the right amount of engineering,
> then?
Perhaps I misunderstood your proposal.
Michael Trier
blog.michaeltrier.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
What I find mildly amusing is Malcolm's comment in the ticket [1]
which is pretty much the opposite of what he's saying now. In his
defence, he did say he would have to think about it for a bit
longer ;)
In any case, before I wrote the backwards-incompatible patch, I wrote
one that is pretty
On Dec 19, 2:54 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 01:12 -0800, SmileyChris wrote:
> >http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2891was marked as a wontfix by
> > jacob after "discussion with Malcolm".
>
> > Neither Collin or myself (or several others on IRC)
On Dec 19, 1:39 am, Empty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had not seen that ticket when I wrote the post, but I think it's a
> very good solution. Although I appreciate all the thought that Vinay
> Sajip put into it, I think the solution he proposes is over-engineered
> for this situation. The
Malcolm Tredinnick said the following:
> I'm basically -0 on the change (maybe a bit more than that) and since
> it's not mountain-out-of-molehills month, I figure we can live with
> things as they are and not imposing unnecessary breakage on our
> userbase.
With respect, I think it should be
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 01:12 -0800, SmileyChris wrote:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2891 was marked as a wontfix by
> jacob after "discussion with Malcolm".
>
> Neither Collin or myself (or several others on IRC) can see a reason
> why that this would cause any big disruption.
How did
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2891 was marked as a wontfix by
> jacob after "discussion with Malcolm".
>
> Neither Collin or myself (or several others on IRC) can see a reason
> why that this would cause any big disruption.
>
> Mr Trier even mentions it on his blog today as an example of
np ;)
>12/01/07 18:58:39 changed by jacob ¶
>* status changed from new to closed.
>* resolution set to wontfix.
>OK, Malcolm and I have discussed this IRL and decided that this
ticket will just break too many people's code. We should instead
change the documentation to not suggest that
On 12/18/07, Vinay Sajip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A reasonable approach would be that the media root for any app is
> conventionally /media/app_label. This is easily organisable under
> Apache/mod_python by having a single media location /media/ for which
> you do a "SetHandler None", then
On Dec 18, 6:01 pm, "Rob Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/18/07, Vinay Sajip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A reasonable approach would be that the media root for any app is
> > conventionally /media/app_label. This is easily organisable under
> > Apache/mod_python by having a single
On Dec 18, 5:37 pm, Vinay Sajip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The default setting for ADMIN_MEDIA is /media/. The doc on serving
Whoops, I meant ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX. Sorry.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
The default setting for ADMIN_MEDIA is /media/. The doc on serving
static media (under the "big, fat disclaimer") suggests using /
site_media/ for other (non-admin) media. The doc on mod_python
deployment suggests using /media/ for media in general, and mentions
that under the development server,
On 12/18/07, Yuri Baburov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, not the first time I see that you guys wrong understand
> your users and their code :(
I'm sorry; I stopped reading at this point. If you'd like to try your
argument again, leave off the ad hominem attacks next time.
Jacob
>12/01/07 18:58:39 changed by jacob ¶
>* status changed from new to closed.
>* resolution set to wontfix.
>OK, Malcolm and I have discussed this IRL and decided that this
ticket will just break too many people's code. We should instead
change the documentation to not suggest that people
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2891 was marked as a wontfix by
jacob after "discussion with Malcolm".
Neither Collin or myself (or several others on IRC) can see a reason
why that this would cause any big disruption.
Mr Trier even mentions it on his blog today as an example of a silly
19 matches
Mail list logo
