I don't know who did it or when, but the http://djangoproject.com site
is now proudly displaying a favicon. Thanks to whoever it was for the
Halloween treat...
--Ned.
Mikkel Høgh wrote:
> If no one is against this, why hasn't anything happened yet?
> If Jacob, or anyone else, is against it,
-developers@googlegroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marty Alchin
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 2:27 PM
To: django-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Still no favicon - Re: Visual recognition of Django website
I'll preface my thoughts with the disclaimer that I have authority
On 10/5/07, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'll preface my thoughts with the disclaimer that I have authority
> here, I'm just somebody who's been watching this discussion.
I am in such a position, and let me say +1 to everything you said.
Thanks for saving me the effort of having
Hello all,
I'm the creator of this mess as I'm the issuer of the ticket 3867. I like
django very much, I'm not that great at python yet to contribute so that was
my try to help you guys. If I would only know how much time would be wasted
on this discussion I wouldn't raise that call at all. So
I'll preface my thoughts with the disclaimer that I have authority
here, I'm just somebody who's been watching this discussion.
First, this isn't a bug in any sense of the word. It has nothing to do
with any breakage of code. It's a feature request. Let's just get that
straight. Feature requests
On 10/4/07, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just let it go already, and turn your time and attention to a real bug.
But see, it is a real bug, at least to people with a certain work style, and
not one they can fix themselves by runnig their own patched django, since
it's a "bug"
On Oct 4, 5:41 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the ticket was closed by a lead developer, and the decision has so
> far survived many other people begging and pleading on the mailing
> list, it's a safe bet that continuing that process is not likely to
> lead to a favorable
On 10/4/07, Mikkel Høgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I have not reopened that particular ticket is that I don't
> know
> how you do things in the Django community. I assume that the one that
> closed the ticket was Jacob Kaplan-Moss, and since I respect his
> opinion,
> I considered it
On Oct 4, 3:15 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This is now just getting rude.
>
> There are over 700 open bugs. If nobody is against fixing them, why are
> they still open? Why hasn't anything happened yet? The horrors! Oh,
> wait, maybe it's that thing where we take small,
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 06:05 -0700, Mikkel Høgh wrote:
> If no one is against this, why hasn't anything happened yet?
> If Jacob, or anyone else, is against it, I wish they would step
> forward and say so. Perhaps even argue as to why.
This is now just getting rude.
There are over 700 open bugs.
If no one is against this, why hasn't anything happened yet?
If Jacob, or anyone else, is against it, I wish they would step
forward and say so. Perhaps even argue as to why.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
11 matches
Mail list logo
