There is a little issue. The name of the tables -on the left- is
overlapping to the name of the objects -on the right-, when there are
large names.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers"
As its a visual issue, I'd also probably include a screenshot.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Kless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There is a little issue. The name of the tables -on the left- is
> >
I was looking at django-updates in google groups , and noticed the most recent
posting from it was from the 18th of March. It looks like something
is broken there...
Since updates don't seem to be going through there, can I ask that
someone review ticket #3349 ("If an ImportError occurs within
>
> My point is that the user shouldn't ever need to worry. A list that
> contains multiple versions of similar things is easy to process by
> iteration. A list that contains "similar things except for the one the
> isn't" is not as trivial to process.
>
>
> Bleh. Adding methods to clean up after
I'm pretty sure this has been beaten to death, and I was going to pass
on sending this in, but this paragraph made me ask, "What would it
hurt to ask?":
{% block quote %}
Unfortunately, sometimes you are not fully in control of the content
you produce. For example, this very blog, published with
As nobody said anything against forwarding my SoC reports here, I'm
assuming it is OK to continue doing it :)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Leo Soto M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:16 PM
Subject: GSoC Weekly Report (#2): Django on Jython
To: JythonDevelopers
الخاتم الهزاز بالصور لاول مره
http://www.antya7la.com/vb/t26679.html
إقرأ هذا الدعـاء ولو مرة واحدة في حياتك
http://www.antya7la.com/vb/t26026.html
تاامر حسني يهرب من مطاردات الجزائرياات
http://www.antya7la.com/vb/t22796.html
محشش يحكي لصديقه قصة حزينة ههه
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Nicolas Lara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You are explicitly asking for different output, so the fact that
>> different output happens shouldn't be entirely surprising. And
>> remember - In your propsal, you're getting back different output as
>> well - one
