to download the latest nice songs
from kuselan and dhaam dhoom
more details
just click it
**
http://lakshmipriyasan.blogspot.com/
**
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received th
watch actress sexy photo
from movie clips
http://priyamaniforyou.blogspot.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@goog
I'd like to get some feedback for the following major tickets
regarding sessions, all of which are in scope for 1.0.
1) Session key collisions: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1180
Due to the birthday paradox, sqrt(n) is roughly the number you need to
have a 50% collision chance when pickin
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 06:48 -0700, mrts wrote:
> I'd like to get some feedback for the following major tickets
> regarding sessions, all of which are in scope for 1.0.
>
> 1) Session key collisions: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1180
>
> Due to the birthday paradox, sqrt(n) is roughly th
Hi all,
I've been looking at #6017 and #5943 of late. These two tickets have
been around for a while; one of the biggest reasons that they have
taken so long to address is that they cover an area of Django where
the testing isn't automated - the behaviour of django-admin.py and
manage.py. As a re
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:48 AM, mrts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to get some feedback for the following major tickets
> regarding sessions, all of which are in scope for 1.0.
I don't really know a nice way of saying this, so I'll trust you to
understand that I don't mean to be a dick.
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 22:00 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
[...]
> I would also appreciate it if anyone could confirm that the same test
> approach will work for Windows. I have almost no access to Windows
> boxes for development purposes, so I'm completely in the dark here.
> However, as far
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just uploaded a patch to #6017 that will hopefully address this
> issue. The patch 'django-admin-tests.diff' contains a prototype test
> framework for django-admin and manage.py scripts. It works by spawning
> a
On Jul 7, 3:00 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've just uploaded a patch to #6017 that will hopefully address this
> issue. The patch 'django-admin-tests.diff' contains a prototype test
> framework for django-admin and manage.py scripts. It works by spawning
> a child proce
On Jul 7, 5:00 pm, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:48 AM, mrts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to get some feedback for the following major tickets
> > regarding sessions, all of which are in scope for 1.0.
>
> I don't really know a nice way of s
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been looking at #6017 and #5943 of late. These two tickets have
> been around for a while; one of the biggest reasons that they have
> taken so long to address is that they cover an area of Django
> > Due to the birthday paradox, sqrt(n) is roughly the number you need to
> > have a 50% collision chance when picking items at random from an
> > inexhaustible set of n items. (0, sys.maxint - 1) is currently the
> > random range. On 32-bit platforms the collision bound is thus quite
> > low as
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 08:28 -0700, mrts wrote:
> > > Due to the birthday paradox, sqrt(n) is roughly the number you need to
> > > have a 50% collision chance when picking items at random from an
> > > inexhaustible set of n items. (0, sys.maxint - 1) is currently the
> > > random range. On 32-bit
On Jul 7, 6:32 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> That comment has no bearing.
>
> (1) We pick a random session key.
> (2) We save it to the database, where it should be unique, otherwise an
> error is raised.
> (3) We use that session key to pass back to the user.
>
> At this
-- Forwarded message --
From: Leo Soto M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:08 PM
Subject: GSoC Weekly Report (#6): Django on Jython
To: Jython Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi again!
Here is my report of what was done on the past week:
- Benchmarked and then di
As one of the people experiencing issues with the session collisions I
will attempt to explain how it manifests and my setup.
My server is a shared host, running Apache, python2.5 and Django is
configured though fast-cgi (My host wont let me use mod-python). The
way it seems to work is a new thre
On Jul 7, 11:09 am, digitalxero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *Adding this info to the ticket as well
Well Trac decided I was spam and wouldn't let me post the data
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"D
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:12 PM, digitalxero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 11:09 am, digitalxero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> *Adding this info to the ticket as well
>
> Well Trac decided I was spam and wouldn't let me post the data
Log in to trac.
See discussion here:
http://groups.g
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Simon Willison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 3:00 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I've just uploaded a patch to #6017 that will hopefully address this
>> issue. The patch 'django-admin-tests.diff' contains a prototype test
>> fr
Thus, looks there are two problems -- collisions happen too often on
32-bit machines (fixed by my patch) and db session backend doesn't
handle them properly (no fix so far).
As for the latter -- Malcolm, you were about to add a clear
distinction between INSERT and UPDATE to .save() in
http://grou
Hi folks --
This is your friendly reminder the three "must-have" features on the
roadmap are due on two weeks -- Django 1.0 alpha is due for release on
July 20th.
We've got two sprints between then and now (see
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Sprints) so I think we're in good
shape to get tho
A quick update!
School things are well and truly out of the way now, so I can get to
work. I have written a mysql full-text backend, and I am now working
on a tsearch2 backend.
http://code.google.com/p/djangosearch/source/browse/branches/soc-new-backends/djangosearch/backends/mysql.py
I wil
Hi,
i just updated to the lastest newforms-admin django, and my fixtures
won't load anymore.
Here is what i get:
Problem installing fixture '../fixtures/tmp__ei.json': Traceback (most
recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/core/management/
commands/loaddata.py", line 1
Enjoy seeing pictures
with new
videos
visit
http://hatsforgirls.blogspot.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group
Hi folks --
OK, I finally figured out what was wrong with django-updates
(http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates); it works again now.
Everyone please thank Karen Tracey for bugging me, and please bug me
again if it breaks again.
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
Hi all,
I developped something that could be called a "Pluggable authentication
frontend framework". The basic idea is to have a configurable "frontend" that
authenticates the user using some "backend" and does some action depending on
the result of authentication. If the authentication fails, it
As one of the original whiners about this issue, I salute you! And a shout
out to Karen for being persistent. I give up too easily sometimes ;)
John-Scott
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks --
>
> OK, I finally figured out what was wrong wi
I've filed #7666 [1] which has a test I wrote that fails to illustrate
what I believe is a bug. The code is a lot easier to understand than
my english, so I'll let it speak for itself. To be clear, I'm just
talking about changing the behavior of
ReverseSingleRelatedObjectDescriptor, not
SingleRela
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've filed #7666 [1] which has a test I wrote that fails to illustrate
> what I believe is a bug. The code is a lot easier to understand than
> my english, so I'll let it speak for itself.
This is certainly a bug. The
I'd like to thank you for this work. I tried it and it *mostly* works
on my Windows Server 2003 machine with MS SQL Server 2000, with a few
hacks:
- Changed the last line in creation.py to (this was just to make it
work in SQL 2000 *for me*, clearly it shouldn't stay like this)
DATA_TYPES
The latest PG has its own text indexing/search system ... is this what
you are referring to by "tsearch2" ?
Regards
Rajeev J Sebastian
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Ben Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A quick update!
>
> School things are well and truly out of the way now, so I can ge
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 10:09 -0700, digitalxero wrote:
[...]
> The issue may actually be with the get_or_create() method of blocking
> collisions since if it generates a duplicate id it just grabs that
> data from the table and runs with it (I think), but whatever the
> actual cause of the issue t
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 13:58 -0500, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi folks --
>
> This is your friendly reminder the three "must-have" features on the
> roadmap are due on two weeks -- Django 1.0 alpha is due for release on
> July 20th.
>
> We've got two sprints between then and now (see
> http://c
I know it's kind of late to bring this up, but I haven't been using the branch,
so it hasn't been at the front of my mind at all :)
newforms-admin currently uses a url match of ^admin/(.*) which sort of kills
reversing - you can't just pass the parts in, you have to manually build the
string f
My suggestion is that we make AdminSite have an attr that is actually
a getter that dynamically generates a module like object that just has
a urlpatterns attr so it's basically a dynamically generated URLConf
and have each ModelAdmin cobble together it's portion and the
AdminSite can put it all t
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> This is certainly a bug. The main question is how to fix it.
Oh, it's a big can of worms, actually. I was once pondering on this and
found some tricky cases.
1) Managers are not just restrict querysets by filtering. They can be
used for example to produce custom querys
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> The rest of the conversation should
> proceed on the assumption that the bug about creating unique database
> entries will be fixed first.
Now I think that the problem is only exists if one uses
non-transactional DB setup. In this case
due to race conditions one of th
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, ReverseSingleRelatedObjectDescriptor uses _default_manager,
> which is the problem (line 239 in django/db/models/related/fields.py).
> One clean solution would be to give each model a _pristine_manager
> attrib
38 matches
Mail list logo
