On Dec 15, 10:52 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Julien Phalip wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 7:34 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> >> On Dec 14, 12:02 am, Julien Phalip wrote:
>
> >> > On
On Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:11:25 AM UTC+11, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
>
> But there has been some significant progress in that matter, like the new
> email package or PEP 444 (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0444/).
PEP and not PEP 444 is likely the more probable target for
Any chance this one (#16455) can be reviewed before feature freeze?
Thanks. Kent
On Dec 3, 1:16 am, KentH wrote:
> Ian's comments were spot-on. And it's extremely helpful when a
> critique comes complete with a better solution.
>
> I've uploaded the improved code patch. Docs &
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/faq/install/#can-i-use-django-with-python-3
On Dec 15, 5:45 am, sirex wrote:
> On 15 Gruo, 01:51, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>
> > but we're not planning to actively support Python 3 any time soon.
>
> Why?
>
>
On 15 December 2010 17:48, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:45 AM, sirex wrote:
>> On 15 Gruo, 01:51, Russell Keith-Magee
>> wrote:
>>> but we're not planning to actively support Python 3 any time soon.
>>
>> Why?
>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:45 AM, sirex wrote:
> On 15 Gruo, 01:51, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> but we're not planning to actively support Python 3 any time soon.
>
> Why?
Dependencies, for one. Psycopg2 and MySQLdb do not officially support
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:45 PM, sirex wrote:
> On 15 Gruo, 01:51, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> but we're not planning to actively support Python 3 any time soon.
>
> Why?
Please search the archives, and the FAQ, for the answer to this
question.
On 15 Gruo, 01:51, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> but we're not planning to actively support Python 3 any time soon.
Why?
Maybe there should be two versions of Django, one that supports Python
3 and other that supports Python 2?
--
You received this message because you
On Dec 14, 7:34 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> On Dec 14, 12:02 am, Julien Phalip wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 13, 10:16 am, Tai Lee wrote:
>
> > -snip-
>
> > > One suggestion from #1105 was to split out this functionality into
> > >