Re: Suggestion: a new "nature" field in Trac

> or an invitation to a 'high value contributors' party at > DjangoCon. Uuu... would I get a hoove shake from Django's Magical Pony ? ;-) Anyways, I'm +1 on adding a "nature" field to track - It would've been very helpful right before feature-freeze (so I can weed out simple features that

Re: Suggestion: a new "nature" field in Trac

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Julien Phalip wrote: > On Feb 22, 3:22 am, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> Like I have said many times in the past -- issuing queries to find >> tickets needing review isn't a problem we have. The information that >> is

Re: Suggestion: a new "nature" field in Trac

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Daniel Moisset wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> >> This is one of those areas where we need someone to step up an >> volunteer to do some Trac work and show us what is

Re: Delete cascade up for Inherited models

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Rahul >> wrote: >> > When i ran the test cases (

Re: Delete cascade up for Inherited models

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Russell Keith-Magee < russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Rahul > wrote: > > When i ran the test cases ( "modeltests/delete/ > > test_inheritance_cascade_up" ) which were doing cascade up for > >

Re: Delete cascade up for Inherited models

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Rahul wrote: > When i ran the test cases ( "modeltests/delete/ > test_inheritance_cascade_up" ) which were doing cascade up for > inherited models, it failed for DB2 cause of the fact that DB2 doesn't > support initial deferred

Re: Multiple email connections

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Niran Babalola wrote: > Multiple databases and caches can currently be configured in one's > settings file. It'd be nice if the same could be done with email > connections. For example, Amazon's SES starts out new users with a low > quota that

Re: Django app framework to allow configuration of apps via admin interface

Please direct questions/discussions about using Django to django-users. The topic of this list is the development of core Django itself. Karen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to

Multiple email connections

Multiple databases and caches can currently be configured in one's settings file. It'd be nice if the same could be done with email connections. For example, Amazon's SES starts out new users with a low quota that they gradually increase, so splitting emails between SES and other connections to

Django app framework to allow configuration of apps via admin interface

Hi! I am working on a django site for simple class (as in teachers) management. Because the people I am targeting for this site won't necessarily have any python or other technical skills, I want to make it so they can enable/disable user access to apps and configure apps via the admin interface.

Re: psycopg2.OperationalError: could not connect to server

This list is for the development of Django itself. Please try asking your question on the Django Users list . All the best, - Gabriel Hurley -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers"

Re: Pluggable encryption for django auth (design proposal)

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:23 PM, poswald wrote: >> Russ, Carl, thanks for your feedback. Russ, I understand what you say >> about not wanting to adopt crypto code because of the additional >>

psycopg2.OperationalError: could not connect to server

I installed the djangostack from bitnami last night, but have a hard getting psycopg2 to see postgresql. I get this instead: *psycopg2.OperationalError: could not connect to server: No such file or directory* * Is the server running locally and accepting* * connections on Unix domain socket

Re: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 0-8: ordinal not in range(128)

2011/2/22 Alexander Bolotnov > I created a simple model: > > class Menu(models.Model): > name = models.CharField(null=False, > blank=False,unique=True,max_length=50) > url = models.CharField(null=False, blank=False, > unique=True,max_length=100) > sortOrder =

Re: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 0-8: ordinal not in range(128)

The problem is, I think, that you're trying to insert a non-ascii string, inside an ascii string: def __unicode__(self): return 'name: {0}, url: {1}'.format(self.name, self.url) Probably, self.name is an unicode string, and you're trying to put it on a non-unicode string. Try this: def

Re: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 0-8: ordinal not in range(128)

I fixed this by change the unicode to return self.name - but why was this failing anyway? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this

'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 0-8: ordinal not in range(128)

I created a simple model: class Menu(models.Model): name = models.CharField(null=False, blank=False,unique=True,max_length=50) url = models.CharField(null=False, blank=False, unique=True,max_length=100) sortOrder = models.IntegerField(null=False, blank=False, default=0) def

Re: Suggestion: a new "nature" field in Trac

On Feb 22, 3:22 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Julien Phalip wrote: > > I know there already is a "Has patch" flag, but I actually find that > > one a bit useless since there's no way to distinguish from the mass of >

Re: Suggestion: a new "nature" field in Trac

On the same note, the Reports [1] page in the wiki contains several links under "Tickets by popularity", which attempt to do exactly this based on the existing CC field. However none of these links work - can anyone recall if they ever did? [1] http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Reports

Re: Contributing Guide Request For Input

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote: > I've added a patch to ticket #14401 based on the contributions people made > to the wiki. This is the final call for comments and review before it gets > officially added. > Thanks! >     - Gabriel Hurley I realize the

Re: Suggestion: a new "nature" field in Trac

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > This is one of those areas where we need someone to step up an > volunteer to do some Trac work and show us what is possible. > If http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/VotePlugin is fine for the needs, I'm ok with

Re: Suggestion: a new "nature" field in Trac

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Yishai Beeri wrote: > On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:22:30 +0200, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Julien Phalip wrote: >> One Trac feature that I suspect *might* help in

Re: Suggestion: a new "nature" field in Trac

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:22:30 +0200, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Julien Phalip wrote: One Trac feature that I suspect *might* help in this regard is one that I've raised before -- allowing users to flag individual

Re: Your thoughts on the Secure Web Application Framework Manifesto

Gabriel, great idea! This is a problem with OWASP in general, but definitely we can do better on this doc. I think we'll first focus on putting our words in action with help in contributing some of the features into Django first, and then revisit the doc. Mainly I'd like to assess what pieces of

Re: Suggestion: a new "nature" field in Trac

On Feb 21, 4:35 pm, Gabriel Hurley wrote: > I'm still in favor of adding the "needsinfo" resolution and would love to > see that happen... I guess technically I could even do that one myself via > Trac's web admin if we're all agreed on it. I agree this is a good idea. By the