t()
t.join()
test = View()
test(5)
8<
Try it now, tests itself.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
le I probably can just save them with random names so random
URI attacks are hard to perform, I would then need to setup a cron job
to remove old files (and an individual could easily DoS the service by
performing a lot of requests until the machine runs out of disk
space).
--
Patryk Zawadzki
--~-
s import BoundField
In [4]: BoundField?
Type: type
Base Class:
String Form:
Namespace: Interactive
File: /home/users/patrys/Desktop/web/django/newforms/forms.py
Docstring:
A Field plus data
Constructor information:
Definition: BoundField(
":
No, please, don't. The master template has no place to "predefine" the
blocks as it's structure is outputted verbatim. Child templates on the
other hand have no need to define blocks outside of other blocks so
it's pretty much useless and prone to infinite loops (insert a pa
to get an instant invite)
Wrong list.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develope
are what JS is uses as long as it works and the JS not
intrusive (like date and time pickers attach themselves upon page load
and are not part of the widget).
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subs
ring the order. One could use the id
> column of the intermediate table. Do you agree that it could be very
> simple to write an OrderedManyToMany Field, but simply adding the up/
> down feature to the widget?
See above, use an explicit connecting model for many-to-many relations
and add tou
as pl_PL. For
example "computer" in Polish:
* 1 komputer
* 2 komputery
[...]
* 4 komputery
* 5 komputerów
[...]
* 21 komputerów
* 22 komputery
[...]
* 24 komputery
* 25 komputerów
but:
* 1.1 komputera
[...]
* 1.9 komputera
--
Patryk
mplating system, by default, problems would be sent to sys.stderr.
With the little exception that writing to stdout or stderr from a
fcgi/wsgi application will kill your application server with a nice
"broken pipe" when deployed on production :)
--
P
eate_strategy=CreateStrategy.MUST_CREATE)
> ...
That's all great and everything but I fail to see why we need such
functionality in django core? Each of the above easily solvable with
one abstract model class and as a bonus you get to pick any of the
user has {{ num_files|default:"no" }} files
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email t
you already evaluated the query.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@
this is that we have to pass an instance of a
> subclass of Context, rather than something that has the interface of a
> Context. Is it a good idea ?
Why not use the opposite test and check for instances of dict?
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~--
services, then? I just have very little experience in web programming,
> as majority of my day is spent doing C# / ADO.NET
>
> I would love some pointers or have a discussion.
The first technology you should use is called "join django-users and
not django-devel
ually switching to python 2.6/3.0.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@goog
reen high and contains warnings
with no legal meaning (at least not where I live).
Please also reply below relevant parts of a post when quoting.
Should you have further questions please refer to netiquette in order
to keep this list clean.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Dis
viously I need more coffee.
Something like that should work though:
try:
reimported = imported
raise Exception, "already imported!"
catch NameError:
imported = True
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
ngo developer to work in London. Please
> contact me for further details. The role is full time and comes with an
> attractive salary.
1) move to django-users
2) fix your signature skyscraper
3) remove legal threats
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~--
ould be reimporting.
>
> Somebody who cares to know about this should feel free to roll up their
> sleeves and investigate.
Should be as easy as adding:
imported = False
if imported:
raise Exception, "already imported!"
imported = True
at t
ble to write {{ foo|bar:baz>lorem }} )?
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-de
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any strong objections to not behaving like Python here?
The less magic the better.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received thi
f one field. SQL termination in the middle of a quoted
string would result in a failed transaction. Also, AFAIR Django uses
prepared statements so there's no possibility to execute code from a
bound variable.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~-
recommend this tweak be added.
Generic views are just regular methods so it would be easier to create
a one line wrapper calling the original and decorate it with
@login_required
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received thi
eople
from hitting this bug even when using custom queries (like
QuerySet.extra) and would eliminate any need of workarounds as django
itself does not depend on such quirks and oddities in SQL behaviour.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
t;
> And I am using a class called Book which will be having the summary
> field mentioned above. So to alter the Book model at the database
> level, i need to run the alter table for Book. I dont know the
> equivalent sql to create a generic relation column in the table.
Just run ./manage.p
t; Now things get really weird: If you cut and paste the line that is
> failing so you that you run it twice in a row, it fails the first time
> (returning a row) and passes the second time (returning nothing)!
Are you sure these are not artifacts from a previous query? Maybe the
cursor was
2007/12/11, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 12/11/07, Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not use
> > http://code.djangoproject.com/timeline?ticket=on=50=90=rss
> > ?
>
> I am actually. But I did just realize the description field
2007/12/11, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Dec 11, 2007 4:16 AM, Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Semantics of COUNT require counting all non-NULL values and some more
> > naive databases might actually try to fetch all the columns while 1
>
s *could* be automated but it would be much simpler if
> truncation wasn't so short. I don't know Trac so I'm not sure if this
> is a setting or not.
Why not use
http://code.djangoproject.com/timeline?ticket=on=50=90=rss
?
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~--
t to the same results.
>
> The COUNT(*) in this case returned 0, and the SELECT which followed it
> ran the full query but with LIMIT 0 on the end.
Speaking of which, since we want a number of all matching rows,
wouldn't COUNT(1) be more optimal?
--
Patryk Z
mark some data as safe for output (for example some HTML coming
from RSS already parsed by BeautifulSoup) by encapsulating it in the
correct classes.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
uses this arrangement:
> > Python
Which is also correct but slightly less desired.
So please count me as -1.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
&qu
initial data.
+1 from me, BaseForm sounds useful.
On the other hand all the magic is tied to Form (including the
metaclass) and most forms already extend the Form itself (and
form_for_* can be told to do so by passing Form as their base class
parameter).
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD
has
> been retrieved).
>
> The ideal API would look like this, and it would only run a single query:
>
> objects = MyModel.objects.filter(site=1)
> first_one = objects[0]
Maybe introduce a resolve() or results() call that just returns list(self)?
--
ith no data (e.g. a form with checkboxes and maybe some fields
> that aren't filled in). That's why we introduced request.method.
What about sending a POST to a GET-encoded URI? You get both GET and
POST then with possibly overlapping values.
--
Patryk Zawa
g
the discussion for a long time and it seems there is no conclusion on
the approach.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" gro
.
(Please note that we are using the trunk of Django and the code was
not tested to work against the stable release, it would also benefit
from being able to subclass models if that feature goes into trunk
before 1.0)
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
2007/11/30, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 16:46 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> > For my needs:
> >
> > * Extendable results of form_for_{instance,model} (sometimes you just
> > need to override one field in a large form)
> &g
e field in a large form)
* Sortable fields on forms extending other forms
Both are taken care of in http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5986
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
0-based apps could be moved to different relative mount
> points
> without changing .py files at all. Or was this resolved when I wasn't
> looking?
Start using lighttpd + fcgi instead of Apache ;)
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~--
ly.
[...]
> Kindly visit www.swtech.njit.edu and help us to cater you better.
> I hope to see a positive response from you all.
Doesn't work for me. No such DNS record.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this mess
SSL certificates can be
bruteforced if you throw enough computing power at them).
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" gro
is only used to link the objects together
> when importing the data?
So just add and implement pk_key="discard" as parameter inside a
fixture? Then the ids are only relevant in the context of matching
them inside that particular fixture.
--
Patr
is more than handy in cases where
the original form is beyond your control (comes from another
application) but also allows people to create Form subclasses that
extend results of form_for_{instance,model}.
Also, regression tests are included so all is guaranteed to work.
Than
is seriously considered for inclusion into trunk.
How about structured markup? Both js, python and xml markup allow for
objects to include other objects. It could be for example:
({name: 'bar', foo_set: ({field: 'baz'}, {field: 'ipsum'})}, {name: 'lorem'})
--
Patryk Zawadzki
PLD Linux Distribution
101 - 145 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
