Re: OT: security announcements for Django-related libraries

Now. I'm going to preface this with being that I am totally nieve about such things. Wouldn't it be nice if you could mark a release on PyPI as a security release and Pip could just do security updates? Somewhat like a few Linux distributions do. Of course that's a long term goal. A mailing list

Re: Django-nonrel patches

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Chris Northwood wrote: > > Surely that's what it needs though, an 'ORM' and an 'Object-Document > Mapper' at some point. What's the advantage of trying to shoehorn > MongoDB to work with an ORM, when it's not relational, and as it has > to be

Re: Django-nonrel patches

Note that I've talked about the issues that nonrel has, and there are many. That said, I have some responses below. I'm not trying to be the nonrel spokesperson. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Daniel Greenfeld wrote: > > I don't mean to pick bones, but looking at the github

Re: Django-nonrel patches

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Russell Keith-Magee < russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Adam "Cezar" Jenkins > <emperorce...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There's an extent to which "Does Django support non-rel" is really &

Re: Django-nonrel patches

I'm only lightly involved in the project, but there is some misinformation going around about it. On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Daniel Greenfeld wrote: > > > We evaluated django-nonrel for use in projects and looked again at > django-nonrel for our talk at DjangoCon

Re: Django's CVB - Roadmap?

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Michael wrote: > I am not ready to judge right now wether they are a good idea or not. > > I can completely agree that documentation makes the views more difficult > then they actually are. Every time I create a new view, I find myself going

Re: Re-design "proposal" for djangoproject.com

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Russell Keith-Magee < russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > > So - if you think there's a need for a showcase site -- go ahead and build > it! > > http://www.djangosites.org/ has been around quite a while IIRC? I remember it being around four or five years ago. Is it

Re: Re-design "proposal" for djangoproject.com

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Erik Stein <c...@classlibrary.net> wrote: > > > Am 21.05.2012 um 04:06 schrieb Adam Cezar Jenkins: > > > I'm sad to hear that about the pony. The pony itself isn't the issue, > the issue to me is that there is a lack of branding of a

Re: Re-design "proposal" for djangoproject.com

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Russell Keith-Magee < russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Adam "Cezar" Jenkins > <emperorce...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Horst Gutmann <ho...@zerok

Re: Re-design "proposal" for djangoproject.com

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Horst Gutmann wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Giovanni Collazo > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > So, I spend a few hours working on the re-design following Idan's > > Guidelines. Any feedback and further direction from

Re: Moving to ... Github vs Bitbucket

Github is just lightyears ahead of Bitbucket in design and usability. Beats it on features and community too. They only time I consider Bitbucket is only the circumstance that I need free private repos. That situation hasn't come up yet. On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Ingram

Re: Why recommend to include project name in settings?

t 10:57 AM, Carl Meyer <c...@oddbird.net> wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 02/10/2012 08:47 AM, Adam "Cezar" Jenkins wrote: >> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Carl Meyer <c...@oddbird.net >> > <mailto

Re: Why recommend to include project name in settings?

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Carl Meyer wrote: > "import .module" Not arguing one way or another, but the above has always worked for me from a Python standpoint. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To

Re: start using less (and bootstrap!)

In this thread. There is a lot of mistaking of an app being installed with Django vs. an app being in the same code repo as Django. Don't worry people. I don't think anyone is seriously considering throwing away the admin. On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Joe & Anne Tennies

Re: start using less (and bootstrap!)

I heard this before from others. When someone installs Django from pypi it can install things like the admin without admin being inside the Django codebase. This is the simplest solution in my opinion. On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Harris Lapiroff wrote: > The Django

Re: start using less (and bootstrap!)

A note that if you use the project django-compressor you can put something like the following into your templates and it will automatically compile the less {% compress css %} {% endcompress %} No need to compile by hand. A note about bootstrap. I'm using it for my project and I've run

Re: Ad-hoc Django integration for fault-tolerance

I also got the backlog, in addition my gmail has been buggy and slow for a few days, so I'm assuming it's Google having an issue. On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Russell Keith-Magee < russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Alec Taylor >